similar to: Samba4: W2k clients cannot perform dynamic updates (TSIG failure)

As a follow-up to this thread (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-April/172892.html) I have created an extra topic, because this is related only to NTP/time sync. I have done some more tests on this topic, as this really hurts and I wouldn't be able to migrate to samba4 in productional environment. We are still using lots of W2k clients which cannot be replaced or upgraded. Well,

Hi; Through samba4 BDC server not update DNS record in PDC DNS server. please see logs 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: send 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: sendto 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: senddone 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: next 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: endrequest 04-Jul-2012

I just can't seem to get dynamic DNS updates working on CentOS 6.4 with samba 4.0 .tar.gz from samba.org using BIND9_DLZ. If I run bind 9.8.2.rc1 in debug mode and go to a domain joined windows client and run 'ipconfig /registerdns' this is what I get in my console: 31-May-2013 23:51:06.520 client 10.0.0.106#54352: new TCP connection 31-May-2013 23:51:06.520 client 10.0.0.106#54352:

My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. --- CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 i386 Hardware: P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory Sata drives - non mirrored etc. Load is light, usually under 0.1 -- This box is running Postfix as our mail server. BIND (9.3.6)

sure.. but we need some info.. OS used? compiled samba or binaries used from OS or Sernet Samba ? samba version? ( 4.1.17 ) The output of you bind9 config files. and the output of the smb.conf and the provisoning.. done how? best is the line u used. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: johannesa at celluloid-vfx.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at

On 07/08/2019 23:17, Igor Sousa via samba wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: > > - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 Ouch, using seriously old and EOL Samba versions is not a good idea. I would suggest you upgrade at regular intervals. > on my domain (*SMB*).

On 09/08/2019 21:19, Igor Sousa wrote: > Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> escreveu: > > > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-) > > Good to know it.

On 11/08/2019 02:36, Igor Sousa wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I've added 'dns update command' on global section of smb.conf file and > I've configured namesever on '/etc/resolv.conf' as 127.0.0.1 (I've > tried with 'kings' IP address too), but I don't know if this has > worked. I've seen some dns updates errors on 'systemctl status

I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king' and 'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain). There are some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries there aren't on 'samba4'. I've understood that I've could to demoting 'samba4bkp' using samba-tool, but master

On 13/08/2019 21:28, Igor Sousa wrote: > I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king' > and 'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain). > There are some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries > there aren't on 'samba4'. I've understood that I've could

Em seg, 12 de ago de 2019 ?s 14:36, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > OOOOOPPPPSSSS > > > > You have compiled Samba yourself, so samba_dnsupdate will not be in > > /usr/sbin, it will be in /usr/local/samba/sbin > > > > so change the line in smb.conf to: > > > > dns update command =

Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 ?s 17:26, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > Well it shouldn't ;-) > > Each DC should use itself for its nameserver > Ok. I understand and I think I've forgotten any step when I had mounted 'king'. My bad! I've set 'king' IP as the only namesever on resolv.conf and I've got a new Kerberos

when you read. : http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg111972.html says: > >That output > ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure >is usually only seen when the internal DNS server is running. >It's a glitch, which can be ignored atm (all dyn. updates are done OK). > so if you dont want to see that error, switch to bind9_DLZ. Greetz, Louis

Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-) > Good to know it. I'll tried if I face the same problem. Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba <

Hi Rowland, I've done how you have said and I've set nameserver on '/etc/resolv.conf' file as 'king' IP (10.41.20.67) and add 'dns update command = /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool' on '/usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf' file. I've still seen samba_dnsupdate fails on 'systemctl status samba-ad-dc'. Is there other way to check if dns

Hello, I still receive this error in my log.samba and when running '/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names'. Has this been fixed completely? Searching through the archives I see this post https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2013-February/090408.html. Using Samba 4.1.7 with Ubuntu Server 12.04. My understanding is the update still succeeds but the error is

Hi Rowland, Before to add 'dns update command = /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool' I've tried once to run 'samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names' and it has returned me TSIG error again. More precisely, 'TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure' -- Igor Sousa Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 ?s 18:14, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

I've found here exact the same problem, I have got: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/linux.samba/QM5jwvVnAPQ/jzQkuAF664oJ but for some reason i can't post there. i did everything according to the official howto - until to the dynamic dns update test: "/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" I get: tsig error with server: tsig verify

Hello I followed Samba4 wiki. All working execpt Dynamic zone update. # From windows client ( info from wireshark ) server is not an authority for domain 0 .... .... ..0. .... = Answer authenticated: Answer/authority portion was not authenticated by the server #from var log messages on samba4 box Sep 13 17:45:56 dcmsc named[2725]: client 192.168.77.86#64591: update 'qwerty.inc/IN' denied

I had freshly installed an Ubuntu Server 12.04lts and Samba 4.0.1 using the internal DNS. I followed the official HowTo until "kinit administrator at DOMAIN.LOCAL" It didn't work (cannot contact any kdc...) A "netstat" showed that "avahi-daemon" was running at: 807/avahi-daemon: r udp 0 0 10.0.0.20:389 0.0.0.0:* After removing that package