similar to: Slow DNS warnings (proxy/auth)

Hello, even though Timo seems to be hibernating (it's not _that_ cold in ole Suomi ;) I'd like to beg for a feature that would be very much appreciated over here. If something like this is already present and eluded my thorough archive and doc searches, feel free to smack me and then point me to the right direction. Feature request: More extensive session information and statistics in

Hello, I'm looking into deploying dovecot as a proxy, currently using perdition. Have been using dovecot on the actual servers for years, nearly a decade. So far just 1.x, but for the proxy it will have to be 2.x (2.1.7 is the current Debian version), as the trigger for this change is the need to support multiple SSL certificates. All that happens on the proxy seems to be handled by the

We (a small college with about 3000 active accounts) are currently in the process of moving from UW IMAP running on linux to dovecot running on a cluster of 3 or 4 new faster Linux machines. (Initially using perdition to split the load.) As we are building and designing the system, I'm attempting to take (or find) benchmarks everywhere I can in order to make informed decisions and so

Hello, this is on Debian Jessie box, dovecot 2.2.27 from backports, imap-hibernate obviously enabled. I've been seeing a few of these since starting this cluster (see previous mail), they all follow the same pattern, a user who accesses their mailbox with both POP3 and IMAP deletes mails with POP3 and the IMAP (imap-hibernate really) is getting confused and upset about this: --- Apr 6

Hello, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 09:24:23 +0300 Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 06.04.2017 07:02, Christian Balzer wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > this is on Debian Jessie box, dovecot 2.2.27 from backports, > > imap-hibernate obviously enabled. > > > > I've been seeing a few of these since starting this cluster (see previous > > mail), they all follow the

I was reading "conf.d/10-director.conf" and it mentions Dovecot proxy. I've been using perdition in the past for my pop/imap proxying needs and wasn't sure if Director could also use perdition or if it only works with Dovecots proxying. Thanks!

Thanks for the info. I do have one further question for you. On your servers that are currently handling 50k IMAP sessions, how many users does that correspond to? Since many users will have multiple IMAP sessions on multiple devices, I?d like to hear about some real-world numbers that could be used for budgeting a new project like mine. Also, do you use Dovecot IMAP proxies in front of your

Hello, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 20:04:38 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote: > Hello Aki, Timo, > > according to git this fix should be in 2.2.27, which I'm running, so I > guess this isn't it or something else is missing. > See: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859700 > Any update on this? Christian > Regards, > > Christian > > On Thu, 6

thanks for your help happy to say that the performance dramatically improved after i use the high performance settings from here http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess grep Login: /var/log/mail.log.1 |wc -l with the mail.log being of a typical, busy day. 412992 i also picked up the imap and pop3 connections during peak hours [root at ns1 domains]# doveadm who | awk

The wiki <http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy> page says this: "The connections created to the destination server can't be TLS/SSL encrypted.". Hrmm. Right now, with perdition, I'm forcing the use of STARTTLS on the internal connections. I'd just as soon get rid of perdition (to have one less moving part in my architecture), but I need the

christian the servers i currently own are dell servers. The servers i plan to buy are Dell R530, 2U rack servers with 8 x 3.5 inch drives, with 64 gb ram each, Hardware raid. I am thinking of 2 X 300 gb ssds raid1 and 6 x 2 tb drives in raid10 for data. I do not have any experience in setting up drdb (that would be my next step) ... primarily using standalone servers with hardware level

> 1. 256GB of real RAM, swap is for chums. Are you sure that 100,000 IMAP sessions wouldn?t work well with SWAP, especially with fast SSD storage (which is a lot cheaper than RAM)? Seems that these IMAP processes are long lived processes (idling most of the time) that don?t need that much of the contents of real memory available for much of the life of the process. I use a database proxy in

Hi, I have two load-balanced dovecot servers using a single NFS mount. The version is 1.2.11. I chose this so that if one server goes down the other will take up the load, and if my load is too much for one server I just have to add more identical servers. It works, but I wish to move to SAN storage because the NFS server is exhibiting irregular performance. (I spent a lot of time with tcpdump to

> 1500 IMAP sessions will eat up about 3GB alone. Are you saying that Dovecot needs 2MB of physical memory per IMAP session? If I want to support a max 100,000 IMAP sessions per server, I should configure the server to have at least 200GBs of SWAP? > On Feb 10, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:13:20 +0530 Rajesh M wrote:

Hi! I am about to migrate a perdition-based IMAP/POP3 proxy to Dovecot. Unfortunately some users are behind a firewall/NAT setup which throws away seemingly idle TCP connections sooner than the established default of 24 hours (more likely after 30 minutes ...) resulting in all kinds of weird client behavior. And unfortunately? this firewall/NAT setup is outside of my control and I have no means

Hello, The users here have been migrated to the new mail system with dovecot 0.99.10.5 (Debian package) on the backends. Storage is maildir, only pop3 access for now. I see very seldom occurrences (compared to the session wide pop lock of qpopper on the old system) like this: --- Jun 16 14:35:52 mb01 pop3(user at gol.com): Timeout while waiting for release of exclusive fcntl() lock for index

Is it possible to use Dovecot frontends in front of UWash backends? I need a proxy pool ASAP. There is not sufficient time to migrate the backends for 40,000+ users so they have to stay UW for now. I have been looking at Perdition but concerned about performance under load. Dovecot looks really promising with it's non-forking mode. I need simple dumb frontends no local mail. Other

Hello, Dovecot 2.2.27 (Debian Jessie backports). When issuing a "doveadm kick" for a specific user I was greeted by: --- "warning: other connections would also be kicked from following users:" --- and a list of 22odd thousand users. As it turns out, kick wants to smack the hibernation proces(ses) that have hibernated sessions for this user, obviously the wrong approach here.

Hello, Just to follow up on this, we've hit over 16k (default client limit here) hibernated sessions: --- dovecot 119157 0.1 0.0 63404 56140 ? S Apr01 62:05 dovecot/imap-hibernate [11291 connections] dovecot 877825 0.2 0.0 28512 21224 ? S Apr23 1:34 dovecot/imap-hibernate [5420 connections] --- No issues other than the minor bug I reported, CPU usage is

I'm a database noob, and it really seems like it would be overkill for my setup: I just want to proxy all connections from my DMZ to my internal mail server -- same internal server for all users. I used to use perdition for this set up, but am having issues getting it to play nicely with my new servers. Can I bypass all of the SQL stuff and just have dovecot forward all POP/IMAP