similar to: Recent kexec-tools and klibc on x86/x86-64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Recent kexec-tools and klibc on x86/x86-64"

2011 Aug 08
1
[socket.h] add (more) missing definitions
Hello, to compile kexec-tools statically against klibc we still need a patch for socket.h, otherwise: | kexec/ifdown.c:46:16: error: 'SIOCGIFCONF' undeclared (first use in this function) | kexec/ifdown.c:46:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in | kexec/ifdown.c:65:18: error: 'SIOCSIFFLAGS' undeclared (first use in this
2012 May 22
1
[PATCH v2] kexec: simply pass LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_KEXEC to reboot
While trying to port kexec cleanly to klibc, came across this syscall usage for reboot(2). Calling reboot directly simplifies the code. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> --- kexec/kexec-syscall.h | 18 ------------------ kexec/kexec.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) v2: keep LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_KEXEC defines, thus no need of
2012 Dec 28
1
[PATCH v3 01/11] kexec: introduce kexec firmware support
> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware
2012 Dec 28
1
[PATCH v3 01/11] kexec: introduce kexec firmware support
> Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper at oracle.com> writes: > > > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default > > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or hypervisor. > > To cope with that problem kexec firmware infrastructure was introduced. > > It allows a developer to use all kexec/kdump features of given firmware
2013 Jul 29
2
[PATCH] kexec/kdump implementation for Xen PV domU
Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel
2013 Jul 29
2
[PATCH] kexec/kdump implementation for Xen PV domU
Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel
2013 Jul 29
2
[PATCH] kexec/kdump implementation for Xen PV domU
Hi all, Here I am sending as attachments patches enabling kexec/kdump support in Xen PV domU. Only x84_64 architecture is supported. There is no support for i386 but some code could be easily reused. Here is a description of patches: - kexec-tools-2.0.3_20120522.patch: patch for kexec-tools which cleanly applies to version 2.0.3, - kexec-kernel-only_20120522.patch: main kexec/kdump kernel
2017 Feb 08
6
kexec to syslinux
Is it possible to kexec to the syslinux interface, thus bypassing the hw initialization? What would be the kexec command? kexec -l ??? --append=??? --initrd=??? TIA Jorge Almeida
2013 Jul 19
1
is kexec on Xen domU possible?
Hi all, I was messing around with kexec and it seems to work just fine on KVM, but for Xen domU images, it doesn't work at all. Daniel, I saw some patches from you back in September 2012 for adding this support for Dom0, but they don't seem to have gone into the kernel (but other patches went into kexec-tools at that time.) You mention that domU support is "easy" after your
2013 Jul 19
1
is kexec on Xen domU possible?
Hi all, I was messing around with kexec and it seems to work just fine on KVM, but for Xen domU images, it doesn't work at all. Daniel, I saw some patches from you back in September 2012 for adding this support for Dom0, but they don't seem to have gone into the kernel (but other patches went into kexec-tools at that time.) You mention that domU support is "easy" after your
2013 Jul 19
1
is kexec on Xen domU possible?
Hi all, I was messing around with kexec and it seems to work just fine on KVM, but for Xen domU images, it doesn't work at all. Daniel, I saw some patches from you back in September 2012 for adding this support for Dom0, but they don't seem to have gone into the kernel (but other patches went into kexec-tools at that time.) You mention that domU support is "easy" after your
2011 Sep 22
4
[PATCH 0/2] reset xenstore watches to fix kexec in Xen PVonHVM guests
The following series improves kexec in a Xen PVonHVM guest. It is available via git: git://github.com/olafhering/linux.git xen-kexec-XS_RESET_WATCHES-3.0 A new xenstored command XS_RESET_WATCHES has been added in xen-unstable.hg changeset 23839:42a45baf037d. The command removes all watches and transactions for the guest. The following patches make use of the new command to wipe all existing
2013 Mar 28
5
[Bug 62848] New: xorg not start after kexec when use nouveau
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62848 Priority: medium Bug ID: 62848 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: xorg not start after kexec when use nouveau QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: SuloevDmitry at gmail.com
2012 Jul 10
2
[PATCH] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: shutdown watches from old kernel
Add xs_reset_watches function to shutdown watches from old kernel after kexec boot. The old kernel does not unregister all watches in the shutdown path. They are still active, the double registration can not be detected by the new kernel. When the watches fire, unexpected events will arrive and the xenwatch thread will crash (jumps to NULL). An orderly reboot of a hvm guest will destroy the
2012 Dec 27
1
[PATCH v3 06/11] x86/xen: Add i386 kexec/kdump implementation
> On 12/26/2012 06:18 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Add i386 kexec/kdump implementation. > > > > v2 - suggestions/fixes: > > - allocate transition page table pages below 4 GiB > > (suggested by Jan Beulich). > > Why? Sadly all addresses are passed via unsigned long variable to kexec hypercall. Daniel
2012 Dec 27
1
[PATCH v3 06/11] x86/xen: Add i386 kexec/kdump implementation
> On 12/26/2012 06:18 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Add i386 kexec/kdump implementation. > > > > v2 - suggestions/fixes: > > - allocate transition page table pages below 4 GiB > > (suggested by Jan Beulich). > > Why? Sadly all addresses are passed via unsigned long variable to kexec hypercall. Daniel
2017 Feb 14
1
kexec to syslinux
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:58 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 02/08/17 06:33, Jorge Almeida via Syslinux wrote: >> Is it possible to kexec to the syslinux interface, thus bypassing the >> hw initialization? >> What would be the kexec command? >> >> kexec -l ??? --append=??? --initrd=??? >> > > It is theoretically possible but
2012 Jul 05
10
[PATCH] kexec-tools: Read always one vmcoreinfo file
vmcoreinfo file could exists under /sys/kernel (valid on baremetal only) and/or under /sys/hypervisor (valid when Xen dom0 is running). Read only one of them. It means that only one PT_NOTE will be always created. Remove extra code for second PT_NOTE creation. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> --- kexec/crashdump-elf.c | 33 +++++++-------------------------- 1 files
2005 Jul 07
14
[PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec
All, I''m posting to the Xen-devel list and the OSDL fastboot list. There are a number of Xen folks who''ll want to look at the code. For the fastboot folks, this is mostly intended as an announcement of the port. Please limit your replies to the list(s) that they applies to, thanks :-) A number of people have expressed interest in kexec support for Xen guests. In
2020 Apr 29
4
[PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Make virtio-mem play nicely with kexec-tools
This series is based on [1]: [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory That will hopefull get picked up soon, rebased to -next. The following patches were reverted from -next [2]: [PATCH 0/3] kexec/memory_hotplug: Prevent removal and accidental use As discussed in that thread, they should be reverted from -next already. In theory, if people agree, we could take the first two patches