similar to: Sourcefire (SNORT) seeks your expertise

FYI Kris ----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> ----- X-Original-To: kkenn@localhost Delivered-To: kkenn@localhost.obsecurity.org Delivered-To: kris@freebsd.org Delivered-To: ports-committers@freebsd.org From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:45:03 -0700 (PDT) To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,

Hello all: I tried to install snort under /usr/ports/security and have some problems. with "make all", I checked every item on the menu but I got error messages: ////////////////////////////// laptop# make all ===> snort-2.8.1_1 is marked as broken: FLEXRESP2 patch file does not incorporate cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/snort.

I figured that someone reading this list might want to take a look at the proceeding, considering that the version of Snort in FreeBSD ports -is- affected. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> > To: cert-advisory@cert.org > Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:30:47 -0400

Hi all, I appologise in advance if this is a little OT, but I am building a box that will serve as firewall and router for a small ''internet cafe / netcafe'' and am using CentOS... So here it is: What are the best tools to be used for keeping the potential script kiddies from ''harming the Internet'' :) ? I specifically want to be able to detect and prevent

Hi all, There are rumours flying around about a supposed vulnerability in OpenSSH. Two details which I've seen mentioned many times are (a) that this exploit was used to break into a RedHat system running OpenSSH 4.3 plus backported security patches, and (b) that "recent" versions of OpenSSH are not affected; but it's not clear if there is any basis for these rumours. Given

Package: logcheck-database Hey, I created a logcheck ignore file for Snort with stuff I don't particularly want to see every day. The one line with the warning in it is questionable, so leave it in or out at your discretion. Also, my regex skills are not as good as they could be, so there are probably mistakes, or things that could be simplified more. Rules are below: ^\w{3} [

Ladies/Gents, /etc/init.d/snortd more snortd #!/bin/sh # Description: start up script for snort # chkconfig: 2345 40 60 # # Source function library. . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions # case "$1" in # 'start') echo "Starting up Snort..." /prod/snort/bin/snort -c /prod/snort/etc/snort.conf -D -g snort -u snort -i eth0 -l /var/log/snort echo "Done." ;; #

I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs to a remote postgres box via a third interface (hme0) Snort is being started with the following command: /usr/local/bin/snort -A full -D -e -d -s -i fxp0 -c /usr /local/etc/snort.conf Where fxp0 and fxp1 are in the bridge output from sysctl:

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

hello list, i''ve set up shorewall and snort inline on a linux box. it works, but snort only sees traffic from new connections. and this is because shorewall automatically generates rules to accept established and related connections. how can i force shorewall to queue everything, so that snort can scan the hole traffic like in IDS mode. The setup i have now is really simple, just 2 zones

Hi All, I am facing a problem when using ULOG daemon and SNORT (inline mode) with iptables. My set up is like this. 1. I need ULOG daemon to log firewall logs to MYSQL database. 2. I need SNORT in inline mode for intrusion prevention. Both can work fine induvidually with iptables. But ULOG daemon cannot work when SNORT is also running. Probably the reason is that snort also hooks to

Hi all, I need to monitor all traffic and block bad requests on my guest machines and also on my xen host. To accomplish this I think to install snort on my dom0 host (rhel5). Somebody have tried this? What about performance on guests?? Many thanks ... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

Dear Friends, I need to know, if RPM SNORT on repository DAG include option flexresp. Thanks Adriano

I want to use snort inline for ips and imq for bandwidth shaping When i have inserted imq module ip_queue module insertion giving error Is it possible to use both at the same time -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, I''m new to the list, but have been through the documentation, archives, etc. looking for more info... I''ve been using shorewall 1.3.14 for a few months now, has been working well from day one. I''m also using it with dshield (submitting logs and using the block list). I''m thinking of adding snort-inline to the mix (I run apache and postfix on the same box,

Is anyone using an inline IDS like hogwash or snort-inline to drop packets in a system running shoreline? I _think_ I see how to configure it, but I''d be really interested in finding a howto or something... Thanks! Mike- -- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at

You are awesome!!!! -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:11 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inlineorhogwash) Tom Eastep wrote: > Thibodeau, Jamie L. wrote: >

Hi all, I read the docu and I read the FAQ, I still don''t know where and how I should include the rules the mark packets for SNORT-inline. They need to be marked in the "in"-queue of the external interface *before* any firewall rules are applied. Any hints welcome. Philipp

Hi, I am looking for some direction on how to configure KVM networking so that a promiscuous bridge/host nic/guest nic allows two different network monitoring packages to sniff the same physical traffic. The idea is to run a commercial package on the CentOS 6.5 host and Snort, via Security Onion, on the guest, both being fed by a physical switch SPAN or physical firewall TAP. The host has two