similar to: Saprouter forwarding from shorewall firewall to an internal saprouter server

Hi everybody, Has anyone succeeded in installing SAPgui with a wine bottle? I tried but the installer exits with an errorlog. I 'am using crossover 7.1.2. in mac OS-X. It would be great if SAPGui would run, best regards, Wouter.

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, im using shorewall 2.2.1 on a CentOS 4, im newbie with shorewall, just testing it i created a dnat rule like this #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT

Hi all, net : internet zone dmz : DMZ zone Lan : local network zone in 1.4.6c this rule : DNAT all lan:10.0.0.1 tcp http - 192.0.0.1 does generate the following iptables rules in nat table : Chain OUTPOUT DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain net_dnat DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain dmz_dnat

Hello, I am running a web server on my internal network. Clients outside the web can view it but inside the network, they get page cannot be displayed. I have tried shorewall faq 2 but it still doesn''t work. interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net ppp0 detect dhcp,routefilter,norfc1918,routeback masq eth1 detect routeback masq #INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS ppp0 eth1 #LAST LINE --

Hi, I have seen this come up in a couple of threads, but nothing recent. I was wondering a couple of things and was hoping someone could clarify. I have an existing working shorewall configuration (Details at end of post). >From within this config, I have a few ports redirected for use with portsentry (like the mini-howto directs forbidden port accesses to port 49999). This works

I have a script for dual internet connections that does this: ------------------------- #!/bin/bash IF1=eth1 IP1=203.219.190.106 P1=203.219.190.105 P1_NET=203.219.190.104 IF2=eth2 IP2=220.245.224.46 P2=220.245.224.45 P2_NET=220.245.224.44 IF0=eth0 P0_net=192.168.0.0 TABLE1=inet1 TABLE2=inet2 ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table $TABLE1 ip route add default via $P1 table $TABLE1 ip

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

I''m not a subscribed user, so please cc me on any replies (fier0@bigfoot.com). I know this has been asked a few times, but i have not been able to find a direct answer. I was using shorewall with 2 nics, and it worked fine, except if that linux box went down then nobody could get out to the internet (and the wife would kick my ass). I''ve now started to use my linksys

Hello guys, I past the last days trying to configure my shorewall 4.06 firewall to allow openvpn bridging connection. My scenario is the following: roadwarrior (openvpn client) -------------> Internet ------------> (X.Y.W.Z - eth0) Firewall/Gateway (10.x.x.254 - eth1) --------> Local Lan -------> OpenVPN Server (10.x.x.249 - br0) where 10.x.x.0-254 is my private lan X.Y.Z.W is

Hi, Sorry, not an experienced shorewall user, this is my first basic setup. This starts to drive me crazy. I wanted to use DNAT to forward port 33890 to an internal machine (windows) port 3389. To reach my workstation when I''m not home. In my rules : DNAT:debug net loc:192.168.0.11:3389 tcp 33890 - pub.lic.ip.add #SECTION BLACKLIST #well known port scans DROP net

Is it possible to pass PPTP packets through 2 firewalls before they hit the remote access server? I installed a Netgear ProSafe VPN firewall as the first line of defense in my network. I have since set up a Fedora Core 2 server running Shorewall 2.1.3 and Squid in non-transparent mode, between the Netgear unit and my network. So, the Netgear faces the Internet with a public, static, IP address.

In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID

Hi I have this configuration: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:F0:54:DC:1E inet addr:10.10.10.166 Bcast:10.10.10.167 Mask:255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:f0ff:fe54:dc1e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1738708 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1538724 errors:0 dropped:0

Hello to all, I post again (last time subject: Line drops strange problem(got event On hook) because i have caught in debug a situation where i get a call and the line drops and i get a call from the same caller and the line works well and the call normally closes by both parties. The only differences i find are underlined. If someone can understand the reason why the line drops from the debug

Greetings! I am having a bit of an issue using Ubuntu 9.10 and AD 2003. AD domain = dacrib.local AD server = dim-2300.dacrib.local IP = 10.0.0.60 Samba server = workhorse.dacrib.local IP = 10.0.0.20 I have been following <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Samba/Kerberos>, and my Kerberos seems set up properly, as I can get a ticket. root at workhorse:/etc/samba# klist Ticket cache:

Sorry I should have said in my original post, this server is a NT4 style domain server. Looking in /var/log/samba I see log files with the machine names in the file names, so samba definitely knows the machine names. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ricky Nance <ricky.nance at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) >

Thanks Tom Sorry, I was wrong, this is the correct question... I have this configuration: | Email Server 192.168.0.253 | ___|___ Port 25 SMTP ___|____ ____ | LAN |-------------------------------------Eth1

I have a debian woody machine acting as a firewall for a small network. I am trying to do a simple DNAT to port 80 on the protected webserver and masquerade all traffic from the protect subnet outbound. After having read the FAQ and various posts regarding problems with DNAT I''m afraid I''m no closer to a solution. Based on the output from "shorewall show nat" I