similar to: Re: Tc rules Helpwith multiISP+ squid& squidguard...

Yessssssssssssssssssss !! THANKSS it Works !!!! Thanks a lot, if you come to Lille,France I''ll Offer you a big Beer) Joffrey -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 21:46 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tcrules

Tom wrote : >My advice to you is still the same -- you are going to have to use tcpdump >or ethereal to see what is happening. You have the computer there in front >of you >-- we don''t. So only you are going to be able to solve this. We are not. >From the dump you sent, it looks like many SYN packets are being sent on >ppp0 >and never replied to. So you need to

>If you > >a) Have the correct REDIRECT rule (which you do); and >b) Are accepting $FW->Net HTTP traffic (which you are -- at least with your >policy); and >c) DNS works from your firewall (I assume it does since you are wide open >from $FW->Net); then >The problem is in your Squid configuration (this is true in %90 of the >reports on this list where Squid

In policy $FW Net ACCEPT Dump.rar join THX -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > >

I have delete "lo" Zones And Interface and rebuild all the firewall >From Local I ping www.google.fr with DNS resolution DNSMASK installed on the firewall. POSTFIX and Squid+SquidGuard Installed on firewall All clients machines have the IP of Firewall for Dns resolution New Dump joint Without Squid : I surf and all works perfectly With Squid And REDIRECT rule : surf Is VERY TOO

In policy : -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > > All works, but no surf with

Ok, I thought the point of asterisk@home was that it automatically detected the X100P board and configured it correctly. Is this incorrect? You still need to modify /etc/zaptel files? And not just using the AMP configurator. There is no mention of this on the Asterisk@home webpage. Can anyone who has actually used ast6erisk@home confirm this one way or the other? Thanks, Dean

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi there. My name is Lucas and I''m from Argentina. Firstly, forgive me for my english since it is not my native languaje. Now, I''ve been reading on how to compile iproute2 and found that I need to add the following to my kernel, which in my case it is 2.4.20, and it is also the one which this document I read talked about: CONFIG_NETLINK=y CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y # CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV

I'm using shorewall 3.0.4 with ubuntu dapper. I've compiled the kernel with the option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I had a trouble with, pptp connection, I'm trying to connect a using microsoft vpn a vpn server out of my lan, and don't work. My files <providers> ADSL1 1 1 main eth1.600 10.190.1.1 track,balance eth0 ADSL1 2 2 main eth1.601 10.190.2.1

Hi, I am trying to set up a uPnP server on a Linux box (Debian Sarge Stable kernel 2.6.8). uPnP works using multicast packages for locating servers. This does however seem to fail unless I set the relevant NIC in promiscuous mode. If I do so, it works well. I have added ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 dev eth0 and echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and the kernel is set up to enable

Hi , I am trying to set up a GRE tunnel between two linux routers. The routers have a 400 MHz Processor. Linux .2 65.0.0.2 Linux LAN1 -------- Router -------- INTERNET ---- Router ---- LAN2 10.10.10.0 .1 208.1.0.1 (Simulated) .1 .1 192.168.2.0/24 /24 Scripts to Create the tunnel ip tunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 65.0.0.1 local

Hi, I''ve been trying out the wondershaper script, but on several of the examples I keep getting the error message:- RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument On the following line:- tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 512kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Based on other posts to this mail list, I gather it is an issue with kernel

Dear Alexey, Sorry to bother you with this small question about nexthop syntax failing, but I haven''t found anyone else who can answer it - including Matthew Marsh or those on the lartc mailing list. The problem, with 2.2.19 and 2.2.20 kernels and versions of iproute2 up to iproute2-2.2.4-now-ss001007 (the most recent that compiles for me), is that this command does not work: # ip ro

Hello, i´ve installed a Suse 8.1 minimal System with iproute 2.4.7 and iptables, Suse default Kernel 2.4.19. When I start the Wondershaper 1.1a Script I get the following Error: CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 72: allot: command not found CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 78: allot:

On Mon, 30 Sep, 2019 at 23:47:02 -0700, John Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662

Hi list, Has anyone here use SquidGuard for their Squid proxy running in CentOS4.4 to block list of bad sites? Is the RPM available using yum? Any feedback using this software appreciated. Thank you very much. junji linux registered user #253162 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed

Hi, The SquidGuard URL redirector has recently been updated in EPEL, and I'm a bit puzzled. I'm still using SquidGuard on a few local proxy servers running CentOS 7, because it's a nifty piece of software for filtering web traffic. The project's home page has remained unchanged for more than ten years: * http://www.squidguard.org/ It looks like the project has been dormant or

Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit?: > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 Now I'm even more puzzled. Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: * http://squidguard.org/index.html