similar to: MANOVA summary.manova(m) :" residuals have rank"

Dear guRus: I am using lmer for a mixed model that includes a random intercept for a set of effects that have the same distribution, Normal(0, sig2b). This set of effects is of variable size, so I am using an as.formula statement to create the formula for lmer. For example, if the set of random effects has dimension 8, then the lmer call is: Zs<-

How to change the background in the plots The e.g. for which I am working is as follows, The R script is ################### start ####################################### amounts <- c(21790,5669,34921.17,60152.47,47228.61,16566.13,8283,3980,5445,1000,125 0,0,1285,1222,5001,600,1950,11580,7520,7999,4850,3850,16900,6095,0,4246, 8556,8280,3020,7250,0,8807,0) # histogram hist(amounts) #

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta8 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta8 Problems Corrected: 1. A typo in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file has been corrected. 2. Previously, the "add" and "delete" commands were generating incorrect policy matches when policy match support was available. New

Hi: I have a Windoze program which uses the printer port for interfacing (not printing). So far, it has indicated when I run it with Wine that the printer port is found but the attached hardware is not responding. I also can't print anything in Wine, but perhaps I can make some progress with that as I have recently found some documentation on the subject. Can programs that access the

I am trying to run a conintegration analysis. I am a former user of S-Plus and understand the output of the coint and VECM output, but I am having trouble understanding the equivalent output in R. Here is what I ran > coint=ca.jo(data,constant=T,K=2,spec="longrun") > summary(coint) The first portion of the output that I did not understand [,1] [,2] [,3] y1

Hello, I'm running my rsynce server on Win2k3 Server. One client under Linux and another on Win2k3 Server. The problem is not really OS related though. My Server 2k3 client command is: C:\Progra~1\cwRsync\bin\rsync -rtv --ignore-errors --stats --delete --delete-during --delete-excluded --link-dest=/cygdrive/d/previous/c/backup.1 --files-from=files-from.txt --exclude-from=exclude-from.txt

Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> writes: > I'm not a huge fan of this because then you get to decide on a default > for all the ports, but I can understand if people want to move this > way to reduce uncertainty. FWIW, since it's one of the three targets Jim mentioned, -march=z10 is the obvious default for SystemZ. On the other hand, I think it's good to run

Thanks for everyone's input so far, it is greatly appreciated. But I've got one last task I could use some advice on Here are the first few lines of my data set: site,time_local,time_utc,reef_type_code,sensor_type,sensor_depth_m,temperature_c 06,2006-04-09 10:20:00,2006-04-09 20:20:00,BAK,sb39, 2, 29.63 06,2006-04-09 10:40:00,2006-04-09 20:40:00,BAK,sb39, 2, 29.56 06,2006-04-09

Today I've been trying to get dovecot (1.0 rc2) to use certificates for client side authentication. If my memory serves right, beta8 had no problems with it (although it was some time ago and on different machine). Similar setup works perfectly well for postfix (for authentication that is, on the same machine). Originally I thought I overdid some certificate settings (keyUsage, nsCertType,

Hello, I'd like to propose the addition of a new SystemZ backend to the LLVM and Clang code base. We're interested in this for the same reason we've been interested in the PowerPC back-end recently: to enable packages in upcoming enterprise Linux distributions that need LLVM support (e.g. 3D desktop support via llvmpipe). Now, I understand that a SystemZ backend used to be part of

All, Currently the X86 backend does CPU auto-detection and subtarget feature detection when the TargetMachine is created if no explicit CPU was specified. It's counterintuitive for low level tools like ‘llc’ to do this, as it means the same .ll file compiled on heterogenous machines generates different results from the same ‘llc’ command line. It is still useful to be able to opt-in to such

> I'd like to propose the addition of a new SystemZ backend to the LLVM and > Clang code base. We're interested in this for the same reason we've been > interested in the PowerPC back-end recently: to enable packages in upcoming > enterprise Linux distributions that need LLVM support (e.g. 3D desktop > support via llvmpipe). Cool! > - focus on feature completeness

Am 1. Juni 2016 09:33:11 MESZ, schrieb Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de>: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote: > >> Hi, i have >> >> stat .../.dovecot.sieve/tmp failed: Not a directory >> >> using >> >> sieve = file:~/sieve;active=~/.dovecot.sieve >>

>>Taddei Herve Com MD PD SWC 3 MCH 23 <herve.taddei@siemens.com><<< Wow!!! it seems that Siemens got an eye over speex ;-).... What other company is watching this closely at speex??? :-D just curious.... John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Taddei Herve Com MD PD SWC 3 MCH 23 wrote: >I will be back in the office on

Hi, I'd like to run regsubsets for model selection by exhaustive search. I have a list with 20 potential explanatory variables, which represent the real and the imaginary parts of 10 "kinds" of complex numbers: x <- list(r1=r1, r2=r2, r3=r3, ..., r10=r10, i1=i1, i2=i2, i3=i3, ..., i10=i10) Is there an easy way to constrain the model search so that "r"s and

Many thanks! On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> wrote: > LLVM: > > LLVM no longer attempts to automatically detect the > current host CPU when invoked natively. > > LLVM now supports all thread-local storage models on SystemZ. > (Previous releases would support only the local-exec TLS model.) > > LLVM now uses the POPCNT

Dear everyone, The in-progress release notes for 3.7 [1,2] make it look like we didn't do very much over the past six months. Obviously that's not the case at all, so let's get them in shape! If you've been thinking "I should probably add this to the release notes at some point", now is the time :-) I have a list below of changes that might be worth mentioning. I

Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry Z10 4G Lte.   Mensaje original   De: admin at pr.copextel.com.cu Enviado: sábado, 7 de mayo de 2016 12:30 a.m. Para: admin at pr.copextel.com.cu Asunto: Daily mail report for 2016-05-06 Grand Totals ------------ messages 409 received 4135 delivered 0 forwarded 10 deferred (114 deferrals) 14 bounced 90 rejected (2%) 0 reject warnings 0 held 0 discarded (0%)

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

The Wine development release 1.3.3 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Improved support for right-to-left text. - Support for CMYK JPEG images. - Beginnings of a Game Explorer implementation. - Improved 64-bit support in MSI. - Stub inetcpl control panel applet. - A number of fixes to crypto support. - Translation updates. - Various bug