similar to: problem with geom_point in ggplot using a different column

Hello, I've recently setup FTS solr plugin, following http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr, and I have this error in logs when I do a body search : Mar 13 01:46:40 mut-mx-1 dovecot: auth-worker(5808): Warning: mysql: Query failed, retrying: Unknown column 'disableindexer' in 'where clause' Mar 13 01:46:40 mut-mx-1 dovecot: auth-worker(5808): Error: sql(user at

Same problem exists, thread A can still be within REAL(call_once), but after it ran user code and set the flag to ~0. Roughly, call_once does: __call_once(flag, arg, func) { mutex_lock(mut); if (flag == BEING_INITIALIZED) { wait } else if (flag == NOT_INITIALIZED_AT_ALL) { flag = BEING_INITIALIZED; mutex_unlock(mut); func(arg); // <=== user code callback

This patch includes: - Event callback handlers - Tests related to events(410-430) --- generator/rust.ml | 38 ++++++- rust/src/base.rs | 24 +++-- rust/src/error.rs | 8 +- rust/src/event.rs | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ rust/src/lib.rs | 2 + rust/tests/040_create_multiple.rs | 2 +-

Hi I hope this is going to the right place. I am trying to write a program which uses KernSmooth library to estimate mutual information between two time series at various different lags. At the moment it’s producing negative values, which is supposed to be impossible (something is fishy). I am summing across one row of the matrix to get p(value is in bin x) and summing across the columns to get

http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdfs.jpg ecdfs.jpg http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdf_curve.gif ecdf_curve.gif Hello, I have generated a plot of two empirical CDFs (attachment 1). As a result, they are stepwise when plotted. The following code was used: > plot(ecdf(mut), do.points=FALSE, verticals=TRUE, xlim=range(mut, non), > col="red") >

I fixed based on comments. I'll send these two patches to this mailing list. - Fix Handle -> Handle<'a> - Add events Regards, Hiroyuki 2019年8月1日(木) 0:01 Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com>: > Hi Hiroyuki, > > On Tuesday, 30 July 2019 07:51:37 CEST Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > > This patch includes: > > > > - Event callback handlers > > -

I found a bug in the bindings, so I fixed it. I'm sorry about sending you the patch many times. Regards, Hiroyuki 2019年7月20日(土) 16:23 Hiroyuki Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com>: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> > > Rust bindings: Add create / close functions > > Rust bindings: Add 4 bindings tests > > Rust bindings: Add

> So this has a lifetime same as the whole handle? Yes. > Why do you then need to keep > it in the list of callbacks then? Because I want to make sure that callbacks must exist while they are running. > Also you explicitly leak it here, so even > without a lifetime it will not get freed. If you do not explicly write lifetime here, the pointer will have static lifetime.

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> > > --- > generator/rust.ml | 13 ++++++++--- > run.in | 9 ++++++++ > rust/Cargo.lock | 6 +++++ > rust/Cargo.toml | 4 +--- > rust/tests/010_load.rs

I am having trouble printing a table out to the GUI display when the table is created and printed within a loop. I get a "Error: syntax error message" If I comment out the print statement, the loop runs fine and I can print out the last iteration of the table. ...[multiple loops and calculations ending with.....]... +

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:27:05PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > > I guess this is a stray debug message? > > Yes. I'm sorry... > > > we did *not* check them into git. > > Really? Does it mean that every time you build the library, Cargo.toml is > generated? That's how it has worked in nbdkit. Whether it's right or not I don't know. Normally

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 06:59:15PM +0000, Tage Johansson wrote: > > > > + // can be both readable and writable, but we survive just fine > > > + // if we only see one direction even when both are available. > > > + poll.registry().register( > > > + &mut SourceFd(&fd), > > > + Token(0), > >

Hi, This is Ariel from the Rust team again. I am having another pass ordering issue. Looking at the pass manager at https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/7034870f30320d6fbc74effff539d946018cd00a/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp (the early SimplifyCfg now doesn't sink stores anymore! I can't wait until I can get to use that in rustc!) I find that the loop optimization group

I apologize if this is somewhere in the archives, but I can't seem to find a solution to this question. I've been trying to plot a bwplot: print( bwplot( n.pareto ~ as.factor(gen) | mut.rate * n.pop, data=p6, horizontal=FALSE, box.ratio=0.75, cex=0.6, xlim=c(-1,51), ylim=c(-1,500),

** I am using the following way to get p-values from fiser exact test. However, I do need to print for each pair the values "n00, n01, n10, n11". How can I print that as a table and not a matrix as below along with the p-value? Any help will be greatly appreciated fish <- function(y, x) {n00 = sum((1-x)*(1-y)); n01 = sum((1-x)*y); n10 = sum(x*(1-y)); n11 = sum(x*y); a =

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Richard Diamond < > wichard at vitalitystudios.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm very unclear and why you think a generic

There are few more things that could be cleaned up related to the coding style and other things, like explicitly specifying the abi style after "extern" (i.e. `extern "C" fn` instead of `extern fn`), but since those are configurable in rustfmt config, I'm not sure whether the config needs to be added or complying with the defaults should be the priority. But this was just

--- .gitignore | 3 + README | 4 +- TODO | 13 +++ configure.ac | 12 +++ docs/nbdkit-plugin.pod | 6 +- docs/nbdkit.pod | 1 + plugins/rust/Cargo.toml.in | 14 +++ plugins/rust/Makefile.am | 65 ++++++++++++

This used to be a single patch, but I split it into two with the addition of struct Scatterlist. Again a bit new with Rust submissions. I was told by Gary Guo to rebase on top of rust-next, but it seems *very* behind? The first patch does not build on its own due to a dead_code warning. It is hard to not have dead code when one is adding infrastructure to be used by others at a later

This adds very rough support for writing nbdkit plugins in Rust. This is not very idiomatic -- essentially we're handling the direct C calls from nbdkit in Rust. We have to use ‘unsafe’ in a few places because there's no way to tell the Rust code that nbdkit satisfies guarantees (eg. around thread safety, always returning leaked pointers back to the close function, always doing bounds