similar to: State of Gluster 3.4 alpha 3 NFS ACL support

Hi, I wonder if someone confirm this behaviour or point out my obvious mistake - gluster mounts via the native (fuse) client don't seem to work properly with POSIX ACLs, example: [jim at puppet ~]$ ls -la /mnt/ total 24 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 16 16:49 . dr-xr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Feb 17 10:32 .. drwx-----x 3 root root 4096 Feb 15 03:00 arccontent drwxrwx--x+ 5 root root 4096

On 13/02/2023 10:54, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows >> admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's >> ???? > > seems so > > I don't know if he would take that one DC down if

Hello, I want to use the --read/write-batch options, but i have problems to do so. The shell script [1] leads to the following error: [sender] expand file_list to 131072 bytes, did move delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file file1 rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 64 bytes: phase "unknown": Daten?bergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe) rsync error: error in

fstest generic case 266 272 281 trigger hanging issue when umount. I use 266 to describe the root cause. ``` 49 _dmerror_unmount 50 _dmerror_mount 51 52 echo "Compare files" 53 md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch 54 md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch 55 56 echo "CoW and unmount" 57 sync 58 _dmerror_load_error_table 59 urk=$($XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

Sorry, please pause this patch review. When I was investigating fstest generic failed case 347 361, I found the wake_up() action should move out the 'if()' area. The correct way is calling wake_up() unconditionally. Thanks, Heming On 4/21/23 4:36 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: > fstest generic case 266 272 281 trigger hanging issue when umount. > > I use 266 to describe the root cause.

Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

I want to get a better understanding of what's happening between the posix permissions and windows permissions. I start with a Samba 4 AD DC with a share: /mnt/data All subfolders and files have permissions and ownership that look like: drwxrwxrwx. 539 root root 52K May 12 17:50 The Samba 4 Admin and User accounts are not local users on the linux server; they are only AD domain accounts.

On 19/12/14 01:33, Rich Webb wrote: > Please is there anyone who has an answer on why this might be happening? > Do I need some sort of sssd support or winbind or something? In the > wiki about setting up acl's it doesn't say anything about any other > requirements, only that you have to have acl support and xattr support > in your filesystem which I do. > > I'm

Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows > admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's ???? seems so I don't know if he would take that one DC down if I recommend that to him > Yes, good to keep up to date, but like you, I don't think updating will

Hello, Can someone explain why my exclude option is not excluding filles as instructed in my script below. I have tried multiple methods and still have been unsuccessful in excluding the one file "test.sql". The methods I have tried are: 1. Removing EXTRAFLAG variable -a 2. Removing using -a 3. Option --include infront of --exclude and behind of --exclude. 4. rsync /software/testdir/

First - many, many congrats to team ZFS. Developing/writing a new Unix fs is a very non-trivial exercise with zero tolerance for developer bugs. I just loaded build 27a on a w1100z with a single AMD 150 CPU (2Gb RAM) and a single (for now) SCSI disk drive: FUJITSU MAP3367NP (Revision: 0108) hooked up to the built-in SCSI controller (the only device on the SCSI bus). My initial ZFS test was to

We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. We can see files, but not directories (with ls, find etc...) We can enter (cd) into directories, even if we can't see them. - Host typology is: 2 replica, 1 arbiter. - Volumes are: replicated and running on XFS on the hosts. - Clients are: GlusterFS native

Hi, Please provide the gluster volume info. Do you see any errors in the client mount log file (/var/log/glusterfs/var-lib-mountedgluster.log)? Thanks, Nithya On 6 November 2017 at 05:13, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see > directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. >

I've been running the same configuration for a couple of years now, and since I've upgraded to Office 2007, MS Word and MS Excel files save to my samba shares as -r-------- even when they are opened as being chmod 777. Files I create/edit using other editors or windows explorer are put onto the share with the correct permissions. My conf looks like this: [global] workgroup = WG

Do the users have permission to see/interact with the directories, in addition to the files? On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please provide the gluster volume info. Do you see any errors in the > client mount log file (/var/log/glusterfs/var-lib-mountedgluster.log)? > > > Thanks, > Nithya > > On 6

Hi, I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy files from a macOS 10.12.2 system to an AFP mounted share. The command I'm using is: rsync -avAX -M--fake-super ./testDir ./mnt/testDir/ This works fine and all the extended attributes are copied and readable. I then try to use rsync to copy these files back with: rsync -avAX --fake-super -M--super ./mnt/testDir/ ./testDir2/ This

Hi all. I'm getting the following error when using rsync: nice -n 20 rsync -e "ssh -p30000" --recursive --verbose --verbose --checksum --times --modify-window 2 --port=31000 --dry-run /cygdrive/f/bkp/Doc/Builds/Buildsheets/ MYUSERNAME@MY.SERV.ER.IP:TESTDIR opening connection using ssh -p30000 -l MYUSERNAME MY.SERV.ER.IP rsync --server -vvntrc --modify-window=2 . TESTDIR

> On 6 Nov 2017, at 3:32 pm, Laura Bailey <lbailey at redhat.com> wrote: > > Do the users have permission to see/interact with the directories, in addition to the files? Yes, full access to directories and files. Also testing using the root user. > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>>