similar to: OCFS2 issues reports, any ideads or patches, Thanks

I had test the command virsh blockcommit, but it failed, with the libvirt version 1.1.0, and qemu version 1.6.0. Is this feature being developing? Thanks root at cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh -v 1.1.0 root at cvk-31:/vms/images# qemu-img -V qemu-img version 1.6.0, Copyright (c) 2004-2008 Fabrice Bellard usage: qemu-img command [command options] root at cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest

Hi, I have another question, when I do the blockcommit command and get the result " Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported ", is it being developed? root@cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest /vms/images/Vmtest1;echo $? error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'block-commit': Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported 1 But as I

[dropping libvir-list - this is a usage question, not a development question] On 09/02/2013 11:29 PM, Guozhonghua wrote: > I had test the command virsh blockcommit, but it failed, with the libvirt version 1.1.0, and qemu version 1.6.0. > Is this feature being developing? Thanks The feature is supported, but you have to use it correctly. In particular, your backing chain MUST label the

Hi, we've upgraded recently from samba 3.0.23 to 3.0.25b. Since then, we've getting these error messages from winbindd: Jul 17 12:00:23 cvk027 winbindd[20772]: [2007/07/17 12:00:23, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(659) The volume of these messages is very high, many times together with unreadable character garbage. Is there any way to correct or suppress these messages? Our

Hi, I was trying to get the optimal 'k' for the knn. To do this I was using the following function : knn.cvk <- function(datmat, cl, k = 2:9) { datmatT <- (datmat) cv.err <- cl.pred <- c() for (i in k) { newpre <- as.vector(knn.cv(datmatT, cl, k = i)) cl.pred <- cbind(cl.pred, newpre) cv.err <- c(cv.err, sum(cl != newpre)) }

Hello, i have got a problem with the configuration of an roadwarrior ipsec VPN tunnel with shorewall 2.2.3. I read the Shorewall Kernel 2.6 IPSEC and folowed the instructions to that point where to modify the hosts with the folowing parameters: vpn eth0:0.0.0.0/0 ipsec But i have got an entry like net eth0:0.0.0.0/0 even in the same file: If i

On 09/03/2013 06:56 PM, Guozhonghua wrote: > Hi, > > I have another question, when I do the blockcommit command and get the result " Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported ", is it being developed? > root@cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest /vms/images/Vmtest1;echo $? > error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'block-commit':

Hello again, We have hit some performance problem today in one of our clusters. The performance suddenly drop from the normal performance (about 30Mbytes/s), read/write, to a few Kbytes/s (about 200Kbytes/s), read only, for a while, and as sudden as it started, it backs to the normal read/write performance, cycling randomly. When the "read only" occurs on one node, the other shows only

During recovery, a node recovers orphans in it's slot and the dead node(s). But if the dead nodes were holding orphans in offline slots, they will be left unrecovered. If the dead node is the last one to die and is holding orphans in other slots and is the first one to mount, then it only recovers it's own slot, which leaves orphans in offline slots. This patch queues complete_recovery

During recovery, a node recovers orphans in it's slot and the dead node(s). But if the dead nodes were holding orphans in offline slots, they will be left unrecovered. If the dead node is the last one to die and is holding orphans in other slots and is the first one to mount, then it only recovers it's own slot, which leaves orphans in offline slots. This patch queues complete_recovery

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

During recovery, a node recovers orphans in it's slot and the dead node(s). But if the dead nodes were holding orphans in offline slots, they will be left unrecovered. If the dead node is the last one to die and is holding orphans in other slots and is the first one to mount, then it only recovers it's own slot, which leaves orphans in offline slots. This patch queues complete_recovery

On unlink, all nodes check for the dentry in dcache and if present they mark the node as unlinked. The last node that purges the inode will clean it from orphan directory. When there is a memory pressure, a dentry may not be around and hence the inode is not marked as deleted and this will lead the file to be in the orphan directory till the slot is re-used during next mount. This patch initiates

?i, I have a cluster with 5 nodes hosting web application. All web servers save log info into shared access.log file. There is awstats log analyzer on the first node. Sometimes this node fails with the following messages (captured on another server) Apr 20 17:31:16 um-be-2 [145813.022112] o2net: connection to node um-fe-1 (num 1) at 192.168.10.10:7777 has been idle for 30.0 seconds, shutting it

Hi. A mongrel/rails installation (proxyed through apache) is crashing for some reason with the following error found in the mongrel.log: ERROR: meta.c (179): wmf_header_read: this isn''t a wmf file /root/local/radiant/config/../vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb:2068: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i386-linux] Fedora 5 mongrel: 0.3.13.3 Apache/2.2.0

Resending after implementing review comments.

Resending after implementing review comments.

Resending after adding another patch to display delayed orphan scan statistics.

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel:

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel: