Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "ocfs2 bug reports, any advices? thanks"
2009 Aug 05
6
Could not find kernel image : vmlinuz
hello list,
I am trying to setup a PXE boot server. Below are the details of the server:
OS : Fedora Core 5 32-bit
DHCP : dhcp 4.1
TFTP : tftp-hpa-5.0
Number of NIC : 2
eth0 : IP : 192.168.100.17, Subnet : 255.255.255.0, Gateway : 192.168.100.1
eth1 : IP : 192.168.1.1, Subnet : 255.255.255.0, Gateway : 192.168.1.1
Client:
OS : None, fresh machine
Number of NIC : 2 Intel Gigabit
eth0 of server
2009 Oct 10
0
[PATCH 1/7] nv50: use SIFC for TIC, TSC upload
Add proper flushes for TIC and TSC and remove
the costly 2D.0110 flush in nv50_flush.
Correct TIC and TSC bo sizes.
---
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.c | 7 ---
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.h | 5 ++
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c | 25 ++---------
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_state_validate.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---
2011 Feb 17
7
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 29302] New: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302
>
> Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb
> Product: IO/Storage
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel
2008 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc linking errors
Hello all,
I was under the impression that llvm-gcc (and g++) could be used as a
standin for plain gcc, without any extra options needed on the
command-line. Is this correct?
If so, then I'm at a loss why I get the linking errors below when using
llvm-gcc compared to a successful gcc build. The multiply defined symbols
reported all seem to come from <stdlib.h>
Any clues?
Thanks,
Paul
2013 Nov 14
0
[ler@lerctr.org: 10-BETA3: Bad negotiation on AHD controller]
Can anyone help me here?
----- Forwarded message from Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org> -----
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 08:46:26 -0600
From: Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org>
To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
Subject: 10-BETA3: Bad negotiation on AHD controller
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Ever since I put 10 on this box (source upgrade from 8), I've been getting
slow