similar to: ocfs2 bug reports, any advices? thanks

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "ocfs2 bug reports, any advices? thanks"

2009 Aug 05
6
Could not find kernel image : vmlinuz
hello list, I am trying to setup a PXE boot server. Below are the details of the server: OS : Fedora Core 5 32-bit DHCP : dhcp 4.1 TFTP : tftp-hpa-5.0 Number of NIC : 2 eth0 : IP : 192.168.100.17, Subnet : 255.255.255.0, Gateway : 192.168.100.1 eth1 : IP : 192.168.1.1, Subnet : 255.255.255.0, Gateway : 192.168.1.1 Client: OS : None, fresh machine Number of NIC : 2 Intel Gigabit eth0 of server
2009 Oct 10
0
[PATCH 1/7] nv50: use SIFC for TIC, TSC upload
Add proper flushes for TIC and TSC and remove the costly 2D.0110 flush in nv50_flush. Correct TIC and TSC bo sizes. --- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.c | 7 --- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.h | 5 ++ src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c | 25 ++--------- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_state_validate.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---
2011 Feb 17
7
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 29302] New: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel
2008 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc linking errors
Hello all, I was under the impression that llvm-gcc (and g++) could be used as a standin for plain gcc, without any extra options needed on the command-line. Is this correct? If so, then I'm at a loss why I get the linking errors below when using llvm-gcc compared to a successful gcc build. The multiply defined symbols reported all seem to come from <stdlib.h> Any clues? Thanks, Paul
2013 Nov 14
0
[ler@lerctr.org: 10-BETA3: Bad negotiation on AHD controller]
Can anyone help me here? ----- Forwarded message from Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org> ----- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 08:46:26 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org Subject: 10-BETA3: Bad negotiation on AHD controller User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Ever since I put 10 on this box (source upgrade from 8), I've been getting slow