similar to: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Bernard Łabno wrote: > Hello, > What does this line mean : > > HTB: quantum of class 10200 is small. Consider r2q change. > > > And how should I fix it ? I have dsl 1mb connection and 2 cards > (realtek-8139C and realtek-8100B/8139D) > > Could the above line cause this ? : > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

look for clamav-devel-* or clamav-dev-* packages of your distribution. Paul Matthews (paul.matthews@cathedral.qld.edu.au) schrieb: > > I have installed the following when it comes to clamAV > > clamav-db-0.87-1.1.fc3.rf.i386.rpm > clamav-0.87-1.1.fc3.rf.i386.rpm > clamd-0.87-1.1.fc3.rf.i386.rpm > > am I missing something if so could you please direct me to the website?

Hi all, This might be more suitable for the shorewall list, but no one has replied yet for several days. I'm trying bandwidth management feature of shorewall-3.4.1-3 on Centos 4.4 with no updates. I've got this error: May 4 22:30:14 gateway shorewall: ERROR: Command "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 13" Failed I've checked the kernel conf (make

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit

Hello, I am trying to set up traffic shaping/control for my voip connection. I am running 4.4.22.3. Here is my current configuration: --- tcdevices --- #NUMBER: IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED #INTERFACE INTERFACES eth1 2048kbps 1500kbps -- tcclasses --- #INTERFACE:CLASS MARK RATE: CEIL PRIORITY OPTIONS # DMAX:UMAX eth1 1 100kbps

hello, i have a config that is with a large domain of rate, from 2kb to 40Mb and i have some problems with i don''t know how to deal with. so here are some classes 2 with q=1000, one with q 200000 and one with q=6400, all have been calculated by htb, in the code i speficien just rate,ceil, no quantum, no r2q, no bursts ($tc class add $IF_INT parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate

Hello! One simple question regaring htb2->htb3 way. I''m using 2.4.25 kernel with tc3 from Devik''s site, RH9. My data flow is about 100Mbit duplex and is subject to grow, so I''m creating root class with 200Mbit rate, with r2q=10, quantum = rate/r2q, and 1500 < quantum < 200000 (sch_htb.c) with such r2q my default shaping window will be from 120Kbit to 16Mbit,

Hello Stef, I am working on a Bandwidth management project as part of my college curriculum.I am running TCNG 10-b but I am not able to classify packets based on MAC address using tcng, so I am running tc commands in /tcng/bin and they are working. But is there a way out to classify packets based on MAC address using TCNG. And, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit

Version 3.0.5 with the two-devices setup (eth0 - net, eth1 - loc). Kernel 2.4.29 tcdevices, tcrules, and tcclasses are clones of the wondershaper example (http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm) with eth0 replacing ppp. With TC_ENABLED=Internal in shorewall.conf: ---- Validating /etc/shorewall/tcdevices... Validating /etc/shorewall/tcclasses... ERROR: device A seems not to be

Hi all, I''m trying to set up traffic shaping and I''m having some difficulty. Here is what I want, and where I am. 1. HTTP and SMTP traffic needs to be priority 1. 2. All other traffic priority 2 3. Torrent traffic priority 3. My distro is Fedora Core 4, and the torrent protocol does not appear in /etc/protocols. The only protocol is TCP, which HTTP and SMTP is built on top

Hi, My system always complain with the warning below : HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change. I simply do not understand why... Below my tc commands : /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 99 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 80Kbit

Hi, I''m getting this warning/error in /var/log/messages: May 26 18:21:05 mail kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change. Its a big deal? What should I do? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

I have tried to follow the HOWTO''s as best I could to add some traffic shaping to my existing shorewall firewall/router. What I am trying to achieve Top priority to all voip traffic, regardless of sip, iax2 etc. Higher priority for interactive traffic - ssh, http General queue for everything else, but A low priority queue for any ipp2p traffic What I have achieved..... Almost

The Shorewall team is pleased to announce the availability of Shorewall 4.2.10. Astute users will notice that the version of Shorewall-perl included in this release is 4.2.10.1. We corrected a problem which was discovered after the release was initially uploaded, and we wanted to avoid the confusion that would inevitabley result if we were to release a different set of code with the same version

Hello, I am trying to block or at least drastically reduced the amount of wasted bandwidth—due to p2p—on a building wide network. My first attempt, was to block it out right. I am running debian etch on my router/proxy/dhcp/dns server. I loaded the ipp2p kernel module and the iptables module. Then I put the following rule in my rules file: SECTION ESTABLISHED REJECT loc net ipp2p:all ipp2p

Hi, I''m trying to configure QOS , but I''m don''t have success. My files: #/etc/shorewall/tcdevices #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH eth0 256kbit 256kbit eth1 256kbit 256kbit eth2 256kbit 256kbit #/etc/shorewall/tcclasses #INTERFACE MARK RATE CEIL PRIORITY OPTIONS eth1

I am having a problem that I really just don''t get.... I have this in my rules file: DNAT net loc:192.168.1.2 tcp 21 21 Everything worked fine earlier today.. Now it is dropping packets destined for Port 21 /var/log/messages: Dec 14 00:36:39 pcp08479598pcs kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0b:6a:3f:e6:72:00:01:5c:22:92:42:08:00 SRC=24.210.36.92 DST=68.57.216.61

Hi i want see if my QoS are good because i am not very sure ... the VoIP quality are not very good when i download. I have on my Linux routeur/Firewall Asterisk .. and i have into my config : ================================================ tcdevices: eth0 2000kbit 2000kbit tcclasses: eth0 1 100kbit 180kbit 1 tos=0x68/0xfc,tos=0xb8/0xfc eth0 2 full/4 full