Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Bug in 2.4.6"
2006 Aug 02
1
Openvpn problem not able to access the other machines on remote subnet
hey friends,
I have installed OpenVPN 2.0.7 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO]
[EPOLL] built on Apr 29 2006) on Centos4.0 through rpm (diag
repository). The network scenario of my office is below
Remote Client ----> Internet <-------> Cisco Pix Firewall
(Gateway) <----> VPN Server
& LAN Clients
2007 Jan 03
2
An interface can reference multiple zones...
Via creative use of the instructions at
http://shorewall.net/Multiple_Zones.html#id2497549.
But can a zone (in shorewall/interfaces) reference multiple interfaces?
I have two openvpn instances running on my server, one bridged (for
upstream access to some client vpn''s so I don''t have to request the
clients add new subnets to their routing tables) and one routed (for
nailed
2004 Sep 29
0
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 65
Hi
I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I
faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was
not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any
help is appretiated .
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net>
To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
Sent:
2004 Dec 19
8
Shorewall 2.2.0 RC1
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-RC1
ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-RC1
Problems Corrected:
1. The syntax of the add and delete command has been clarified in
the help summary produced by /sbin/shorewall.
New Features:
1. TCP OpenVPN tunnels are now supported using the ''openvpn'' tunnel
type. OpenVPN
2004 Dec 26
1
Preparing for Shorewall 2.2 -- End of Support for Shorewall 1.4 is near!
Shorewall 2.2.0 is expected to be released in the February/March
timeframe so it is now time to begin thinking about preparing to
upgrade. This is particularly important for those of you still running
Shorewall 1.4 since support for that version will end with the release
of 2.2.
For those of you still running Shorewall 1.4, here are some things that
you can do ahead of time to ease the upgrade to
2007 May 16
1
www.shorewall.net/ftp.shorewall.net is down
The administrator of the main web/ftp site has informed me that the site
is currently down. Until service is restored, you can use:
http://www1.shorewall.net
ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net
Sorry for the inconvenience.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
PGP Public Key \
2004 Dec 13
4
Re: Can Multiple openvpn processes run on LEAF?
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:03 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:45 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:43 -0500, M Lu wrote:
> > > Tom, can he specify openvpn twice in the tunnel file, e.g.
> > >
> > > openvpn:udp:5000
> > > openvpn:udp:5001
> > >
> > > I think I had the problems with that so I use
2007 Jul 06
8
interop with strongswan / ipsec
I see support in shorewall for the KAME-tools, how about strongswan ?
I have setup shorewall 3.4.4 and strongswan 4.1.3, making this my
vpn-gateway for the subnet behind it.
# Shorewall version 3.4 - Zones File
#ZONE TYPE OPTIONS IN OUT
# OPTIONS OPTIONS
fw firewall
fil ipsec mode=tunnel mss=1400
net ipv4
2004 Jun 01
3
Shorewall.net Downtime this Weekend
The following systems will be down this weekend for server rebuild:
shorewall.net
lists.shorewall.net
www1.shorewall.net
ftp1.shorewall.net
rsync.shorewall.net
cvs.shorewall.net
This will affect:
Shorewall site and archive search
Mailing list archives
Mailing lists
CVS
Primary DNS for shorewall.net
I will start the rebuild on Saturday morning and hope to be done by
Saturday
2004 Nov 11
0
Shorewall.net downtime again this weekend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, I will be rebuilding my server. I expect the project to
take most of the day. I will begin around 7AM PST (-0800).
The server hosts the following sites:
www1.shorewall.net (a.k.a. shorewall.net)
ftp1.shorewall.net
lists.shorewall.net
rsync.shorewall.net
Sorry for the inconvenience.
- -Tom
- --
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof
2004 Nov 21
0
Shorewall.net running on temporary server
While I rebuild my server, shorewall.net is running on an old slow
system. This affects:
lists.shorewall.net
shorewall.net
ftp1.shorewall.net
www1.shorewall.net
I encourage you to avoid these systems until the new server is ready.
Thanks,
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2006 Nov 07
0
LOGFORMAT Problem in Shorewall 3.2.*
A fix is available at http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.2/shorewall-3.2.5
If white space is included in LOGFORMAT then a startup error results.
Either:
a) Replace /usr/share/shorewall/compiler and /usr/share/shorewall/functions
with the ''compiler'' and ''functions'' files from the errata/Shorewall/
sub-directory.
b) Patch
2006 Mar 28
0
Shorewall 3.0.6
http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.0/shorewall-3.0.6/
ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.0/shorewall-3.0.6/
Coming soon to a Mirror near you.
Problems corrected in 3.0.6
1) A typo in the output of "help drop" has been corrected.
2) Previously, ''shorewall start'' would fail in the presence of a network
interface named ''inet''.
3)
2004 Jul 12
0
shorewall.net down time
Today I am having a new DSL line installed. Once the line is in and
operational, I will be moving my local network from the old line to the
new; I am expecting minimal down time (an hour or two) but as those of
you who have been involved in such things know, there is no way of
knowing what disasters are going to happen.
Services impacted will be:
http://shorewall.net (a.k.a.,
2004 Sep 16
0
Shorewall-2.1.9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.1/shorewall-2.1.9
ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.1/shorewall-2.1.9
Problems Corrected:
1) IP ranges in the routestopped and tunnels files now work.
2) Rules where an IP range appears in both the source and destination
~ now work correctly.
3) With complex proxy arp configurations involving two or
2011 Jul 21
42
Problem With OpenVPN Connectivity
Hi,
I''m running Slackware 13.37 x86 using Shorewall 4.4.21 with OpenVPN and the
VPN options I''m using in Slackware 13.37 will not work in Shorewall, but in
Slackware 13.1 using the same Shorewall version and files, the ''interfaces'',
''policy'' and ''zone'', are all I have configured, it was working and this also
works in Arch at
2004 Dec 19
6
IPSEC vs OpenVPN
While I have concentrated on support for 2.6 native IPSEC in release
2.2.0, I am still of the opinion that unless you absolutely need IPSEC
compatibility that OpenVPN is a much easier (and in the case of
roadwarriors, a much better) solution.
Having already generated all of the required X.509 certificates, it took
me less than 1/2 hr to replace my IPSEC testbed with an OpenVPN one
using the new
2006 Aug 25
0
[Bug 506] New: iptables-save aborts
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=506
Summary: iptables-save aborts
Product: iptables
Version: 1.3.5
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Fedora
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: iptables-save
AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
ReportedBy: davidhart@tqmcube.com
2005 Jun 27
5
Bridging problem with Shorewall and OpenVpn
Hello All,
I am trying to implement OpenVPN on Fedora core Linux 3 with the latest
pathces
installed. This server is used only as firewall/internet gateway/proxy/VPN
server, with kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 and kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 SMP
It has two NIC''s eth0 (10.0.0.150) connected to ADSL, eth1 (192.168.3.12)
connected to the local network.
I use shorewall 2.4 on this machine.
I like to test
2007 Aug 21
10
Bug in Multi-ISP support
In helping a user on IRC today, I was dismayed to find that a bug that
was supposedly fixed in Shorewall 3.4.4 was not fixed. Furthermore, I
found that the bug is present as far back as 3.2.6 (I didn''t look back
further since 3.2.6 was the release where the user (re-) discovered the
bug.
If HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=No, then PREROUTING and OUTPUT marking rules are
behaving as if TC_EXPERT=Yes was