similar to: RE: Apache Virtual Hosts Problem

How do I configure my DHCP client to restart Shorewall when it obtains a new IP address? Blake

i ask here after give up reading and following all the documentation.. i got 3 nic eth0:222.222.222.222 netmask:255.255.255.252 gateway:222.222.222.221 eth1:10.10.10.254 netmask:255.255.255.0 gateway:blank eth2:10.10.11.254 netmask:255.255.255.0 gateway: blank i''m running redhat9, and shorewall2.2.2 eth0 connected to dsl modem ( static ip ) eth1 connected to d-link router ( for

Le 24/11/2016 ? 10:22, Yamaban a ?crit : > Hmmm, looks like the "lookup question" from amandine(server) is not > resolved in the same way it is resoved from bernadette or raymonde > (clients). After some more fiddling, I guess I found a solution to my problem. If we formulate the problem differently, we can say that the clients use the information provided by Dnsmasq, but the

Hi, I just setup CentOS 7 on three boxes to fiddle with it. 1. amandine.sandbox.lan is a headless LAN server 2. bernadette.sandbox.lan is a client desktop 3. raymonde.sandbox.lan is another client desktop I've setup Dnsmasq on amandine.sandbox.lan. Here's the very basic configuration: # /etc/dnsmasq.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface=enp3s1

Hello I have DSL 2000 (2048 kbit/s download and 256 kbit/s upload) I have ping to fast sites very high: 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2185 ms 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=1983 ms 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=1826 ms and I know why. I have 2 interfaces:

I need helping again implementing samba4 ad and dns: Actually we have a dnsmasq server with dhcp/dns services for users on the lan, if we start to using the internal samba4 dns server to resolv names on the zone of DC server example mydomain.test.com we can use the actual dnsmasq to server another domains that we need ?, for example otherdomain.testing.com.ar If that is correct we need to

Hello everyone ! Well, I'm setting up a 'new' box with samba 4.9.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 Idea is to use Host OS for Domain Controler (dc1.smb.domain.tld) and a LXC container (ubuntu 18.04 too) as Domain Member with File Server (fs.smb.domain.tld). Administration through Windows OS will be done with a Qemu KVM. Bad thing is that I get : > Failed to bind to 0.0.0.0:53 TCP -

Correct we have the dnsmasq server dns+dhcp on other ip server. So if I understand well, we will use the samba DC as a "authoritative nameserver" and the dnsmasq as a forwarder dns for resolve outside our zone ? And we set on the dnsmasq (when deliver ip to the client as a dhcp server) the primary dns is a samba DC server, and too we can set the dnsmasq a secondary dns server or is not

That mean for example if my domain resolve xxxxx.testing.mydomain.com the dnsmasq should NOT resolv xxxxxx.mydomain.com this is in ascending way ? Another way to expose: We set dnsmasq+dhcp to set clients that the only DNS server is samba DC on the domain name mysubdomain.mydomain.com DC for example resolv server1.mysubdomain.mydomain.com right, now if a client as for a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, maybe this is an old fart, but I cant get it to work. I am running libvirt on a laptop, where a dnsmasq is already running to delegate dns info for my local (not-public) network. My resolv.conf (on the host) lists the system-dnsmasq as first server. I had to set the listen-adress for the system-dnsmasq to 127.0.0.1 and set

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Vonau" <jvonau@shaw.ca> To: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users" <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 08:06 Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Two Links and DNAT > > > > Btw, by "shorewall show nat" I just noticed that I was doing snat only > > for packets comming

I think I finally have nailed down the problems with TFTP on the 4.10 branch, and so I have released 4.10-pre20. Please let me know if you have hardware on which 4.05/4.06-pre3 works, and 4.10-pre20 does not. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

Hi. I have a machine with a local DHCP server and a couple of virtual networks and I've configured the server for each virtual interface, so that I would be able to install VMs on the corresponding subnets using PXE. The problem is that the two DHCP servers (my local server and dnsmasq) are conflicting with each other causing the boot process to either fails or takes ages untill a VM can

On Di, 2014-02-18 at 16:06 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > There should be no problem upgrading to a newer libvirt. We take great > pains to ensure that a newer version of libvirt can be reloaded and > gracefully understand the XML recorded by older versions, with no loss > to running VMs. While there have been bugs on this front, they get > caught and patched quickly, so by updating

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

Hello there, I wanted to share a problem I'm having with libvirt, for the case someone here could know how to solve it. I'm using an Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I have libvirtd already installed and I think I got all the dependencies installed. So, I'm using virsh net-create to create this network: <network> <name>pepito</name> <forward mode='nat'/>

On 02/09/2020 15:42, Nick Howitt via samba wrote: > Or set dnsmasq as the primary DNS server, but include a line in your > dnsmasq config: > server=/your.dc.domain/your.dc.ip Don't do that. To be honest, I wouldn't use dnsmasq at all, but if I had to, I wouldn't do that ;-) Rowland

On Wed, 12 Jun, at 11:17:44AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Cool thanks!. Now looks better, but still not work. > > For some reason, "ldlinux.c32" is apparently sent but "Failed to load" > by PXELINUX and few seconds later, dnsmasq shows an error message > "failed sending": Argh! The patch was broken. I missed the new core/path.c file. My bad.

This lays 90% of the groundwork needed on the server side to support the use of a remote ipa server. Leaving the option disabled in the installer until the necessary node integration(dns/keytab placementi location) is completed Also apply: [PATCH server] update ovirt-add-host to use ipa commands instead of kadmin.local [PATCH server] separate ipa common tasks freeipa::common and rename

On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 05:20:47PM -0400, Michael C Cambria wrote: >I also tried stopping libvirtd, renaming both qemu-system-i386 and >qemu-system-x86_64, start libvirtd. Things get further along; dnsmasq >log messages show up. > >$ sudo systemctl status libvirtd.service >● libvirtd.service - Virtualization daemon > Loaded: loaded