similar to: Shorewall and multicast

I am trying to set up my Shorewall box to forward multicast packets to my local net. I do have some problems with mrouted (see below), but I can join and add routes using smcroute. Multicast works when shorewall is disabled. I got a lot of help from the following. http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016674.html I cannot get the multicast packets to pass the fw when

I have a standard 3 interface shorewall setup and I want to receive multicast stuff from ''net'' -> ''loc''. This requires me, first, to do an IGMP join which involves 192.168.1.x -> 224.0.0.x being NATed out as the ''net'' interface''s IP address. Obviously replies have to be NATed back to ''loc'' addresses. Can

Hello, Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast group is set at 20? Are there issues with increasing this number? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Steve Clark -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a

Hi, my ISP is streaming some local concert using UDP multicasting. I followed the instructions on the site which described how to set VLC in order to view the stream, but it didn''t work. I am behind a Linux router/firewall doing NAT. Using google, I quickly found out that the netfilter/conntrack code doesn''t support NATing multicast traffic. I thought about bridging the internet

Hi When I start shorewall, the multicast stream is stopped. My config: Windows VLC Client-----eth0:192.168.254.1/24--fw---eth1:191.168.254.254/16-------------------------Linux VLC Streaming server 192.168.254/24 lan wan (but it''s really a internal lan !) 191.168.1.21/16 on the FW/shorewall route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask

On 31.07.2014 17:23, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 31.07.2014 15:14, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> Hi, >> today a couple of Hypervisors got restarted due to a power outage. While >> the systems and the VMs on the are running fine multicast traffic >> between the guests is no longer working. >> >> I generate multicast udp packet using iperf in the guest

hi all, This is my first message to the group.My name is Anirban Chakraborti and I am with new mexico state university. I have recently built a router using suse linux.I need to turn on IGMP and PIM to allow it do multicasting.How to do that? Secondly I also want to control the rate of the datatransfer from the router''s ethernet interface to the ppp interface. Thanks for the

I need to send multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel between two Linux routers. The tunnel works for normal IP packets, but I can''t see how to make it work for multicast. Here''s the setup: 10.10.10.0/24 LAN-B--------------RtrB-------------RtrC--------------LAN-C 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 RtrB interfaces: eth0

The BBC are currently trialling multicasting the Olympics. This requires multicast and IGMP to be available. As far as I can make out, in 2.0.8 at least, all multicast addresses are filtered out and, to my naive eyes, can''t be re-enabled. Please prove me wrong :-) Dirk -- Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Message,

What shorewall rules would be required to allow the OSPF routing protocol to pass fw<->loc? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ben

Hi all, Does anyone know of a method of sending a raw G711 stream to an address in Asterisk. For example, an application that takes a argument of a phone and a port. The reason? I have found a method to paging on Zultys ZIP2 and ZIP4x4 handsets. Basically it involves sending a stream of RTP data to port 3771 to multicast address 224.0.0.1. Would it need to involve me writing my

I've got a vector of data (hours to drive from a to b) y. After a qqplot I know, that they don't fit the normal probability. I would like to transform these data with the boxcox transformation (MASS), that they fit the model. When I try ybx<-boxcox(y~1,0) qqnorm(ybx) the plot is different from library (TeachingDemos) ybct<-bct(y,0) // qqnorm(ybct) How can I transform

Hi all, I was trying to test ROUTE specific code with a multi-isp serviced box. There is a bug somewhere, but I''m not able to understand what the real problem is: when I issue a "shorewall show capabilities" I get: Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Shorewall has

I have a Debian 8 64-bit machine set up as a server and apt-got the tinc package. I configured tinc as a bridge and everything seems normal except that the tunnel does not forward multicast traffic. I used tcpdump to examine the br0, eth0 and tap interfaces. I could see multicast packets on both br0 and eth0, but there is no such packet present on the tap interface. I don't quite know why

I''m just looking for a quick sanity check to make sure what I''m finding is really all necessary here. I''m upgrading a gateway/firewall from Linux 2.4 to 2.6 using Mandrake 10.1. In the old 2.4 kernel I structured my firewall rules around the ipsec0 interface, which I understand isn''t present with Openswan running under 2.6 (no KLIPS). Ok, So as I start to

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |

I am setting up 2 Vyatta routers that will serve as redundant failover core routers out to the backbone of our ISP. They will be serving for routing between other branches and the ISP and bandwidth management. I am trying to differentiate between the plethora of information about having redundant, automatic failover routers and pretty much decided on VRRP for the IP address failover mechanism. I

Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is present that the other one is present, too. This patch makes the behaviour and fix added in "bridge:

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of