similar to: Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable

Package: xen Version: 4.0.1-5.11 Severity: important Tags: security, patch, fixed-upstream http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/11/21/2 Description: An inverted boolean parameter resulted in TLB flushes not happening upon clearing of a present translation table entry. Retaining stale TLB entries could allow guests access to memory that ought to have been revoked, or grant greater

Attached patch for svm will enable a tlb flush for each vmrun. Applies cleanly to 8781:dcc2beb8a1d2 Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@amd.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, Are you going to fix https://bugs.debian.org/730254 or what is the status? I would like to close old issues in case these are not going to get fixed. --- Henri Salo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:

Signed-off-by: Kieran Mansley <kmansley@solarflare.com> Allow iomem permissions to be set up through grant table ops diff -r 749b60ccc177 xen/arch/x86/mm.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c Wed Jul 25 14:03:08 2007 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c Wed Jul 25 14:03:12 2007 +0100 @@ -594,6 +594,14 @@ get_##level##_linear_pagetable( return 1; \ } + +int iomem_page_test(unsigned long mfn,

Hi, Patch below is needed to make my system work stable in PAE mode. Havn''t seen problems without PAE, not sure whenever thats just pure luck or whenever there is a bug in my PAE xenlinux kernel. To me it looks like a generic bug though. I''ve actually trapped into problems with unpin only: A process exits, somewhere in exit_mm() the page tables are unpinned, shortly thereafter

Again, the answer is "interactivity does not matter". On March 19, 2023 12:54:28 PM PDT, akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com> wrote: >Dear Jeff, > I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the

On 19/03/2023 2:55 p.m., akshay kulkarni wrote: > Dear Duncun, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What if there is no interactive "session" > running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux. I was talking about the session that is created for the duration of the BATCH run, not some other session that may be running in another process. Sorry for the

Dear Jeff, I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the context..... thanking you, yours sincerely AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> Sent: Monday, March

> On Jun 25, 2019, at 8:36 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:49 PM Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: >> To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs >> concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. The current >> flush_tlb_others() interface is kept, since paravirtual

No, there are lots of situations where that doesn't make sense. You don't want to have to define local copies of the functions from every package you use, for example. I think the takeaway is to learn how R scoping works, and keep things simple. That's one reason I tend to avoid "tidyverse" packages. There are a lot of really good ideas in those packages, but

Now it outputs: nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_STATUS: BUSY DISPATCH VFETCH CCACHE_UNK4 STRMOUT_GSCHED_UNK5 UNK14XX UNK1CXX CLIPID ZCULL ENG2D UNK34XX TPRAST TPROP ROP (0x011fde03) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS: CCACHE (0x00145b4d) (0x0000002d) ENG2D ROP (0x0034db40) instead of: [drm] nouveau

Dear Duncun, What if there is no interactive "session" running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux. THanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 12:20 AM To: akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>; R

Now it outputs: nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_STATUS: BUSY DISPATCH VFETCH CCACHE_UNK4 STRMOUT_GSCHED_UNK5 UNK14XX UNK1CXX CLIPID ZCULL ENG2D UNK34XX TPRAST TPROP ROP (0x011fde03) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS_0: CCACHE (0x00145b4d) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS_1: (0x0000002d)

What do _you_ mean when you use the term "interactive"? Because R distinguishes between executing code in a function and executing code from the global environment, but it does not care whether a person is doing the typing or not. I get the feeling that you think of your R code in terms of "scripts" when you should be thinking of your code in terms of functions. What

Dear Duncan, THanks for the reply...! So the takeaway is that define the symbol in the same environment before using it right!? Thanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI ________________________________ From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 8:21 PM To: akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>; Deepayan Sarkar

Currently, local and remote TLB flushes are not performed concurrently, which introduces unnecessary overhead - each INVLPG can take 100s of cycles. This patch-set allows TLB flushes to be run concurrently: first request the remote CPUs to initiate the flush, then run it locally, and finally wait for the remote CPUs to finish their work. In addition, there are various small optimizations to avoid

Dear Jeff, Thanks for your reply. I have the following: > colnames(IDT[[4]]) [1] "X168" "TATA.MOTORS.LIMITED" "TATAMOTORS" "X4" THe above has to be the first row of IDT[[4]]. The first row is getting parsed as the column name. How do you make that the first row of IDT[[4]]? Thanking you, Yours sincerely,

This is what I get: > source("~/temp/test.R", echo = TRUE) > print(1) [1] 1 > stop("here") Error in eval(ei, envir) : here I get similar output in every variation I tried. It never prints the 2. On 12/04/2023 8:13 a.m., akshay kulkarni wrote: > Dear Duncan, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What if I use source() with echo? I am using > that in RStudio.

On 03.07.19 01:51, Nadav Amit wrote: > To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs > concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce > paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen > and hyper-v are only compile-tested). > > While the updated smp infrastructure is capable of running a function on > a single

On 03.07.19 01:51, Nadav Amit wrote: > To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs > concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce > paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen > and hyper-v are only compile-tested). > > While the updated smp infrastructure is capable of running a function on > a single