similar to: [PATCH 0/4] xen/arm: guest SMP support

Biggest change is to switch the new DTB node to /xen-core-devices instead of /xen at Stefano''s request. I also dropped the few patches title HACK etc which weren''t supposed to be there and fixed up some bits and pieces which folks commented on. George, WRT the freeze I think this is functionality which we cannot ship Xen 4.4 without. The impact is entirely constrained to the

I''ve addressed all (I think/hope) of the review comments. The main change is to expose the guest virtual platform (e.g. memory layout and interrupt usage etc) to the toolstack via the public interface. This is then used during FDT generation. I have just codified the current defacto standard layout, it''s probably not the best layout but any change can be a separate patch/series.

Hello everyone, this is the fourth version of the patch series that introduces ARMv7 with virtualization extensions support in Xen. The series allows Xen and Dom0 to boot on a Cortex-A15 based Versatile Express simulator. See the following announce email for more informations about what we are trying to achieve, as well as the original git history: See

Hello everyone, this is the very first version of the patch series that introduces ARMv7 with virtualization extensions support in Xen. The series allows Xen and Dom0 to boot on a Cortex-A15 based Versatile Express simulator. See the following announce email for more informations about what we are trying to achieve, as well as the original git history: See

First off, Apologies for the massive patch series... This series boots a 32-bit dom0 kernel to a command prompt on an ARMv8 (AArch64) model. The kernel is the same one as I am currently using with the 32 bit hypervisor I haven''t yet tried starting a guest or anything super advanced like that ;-). Also there is not real support for 64-bit domains at all, although in one or two places I

This round implements all of the review comments from V2 and all patches are now acked. Unless there are any objections I intend to apply later this morning. Ian.

George has release acked all of these. Otherwise mostly minor updates this time around. Summary: A == acked, M == modified A xen: arm64: Add 8250 earlyprintk support A xen: arm64: Add Basic Platform support for APM X-Gene Storm. A xen: arm64: Add APM implementor id to processor implementers. M xen: arm: add a quirk to handle platforms with unusual GIC layout A xen: arm: allow platform

With linux-next-2017-12-14, I get a crash when nouveau is loaded by systemd-udevd. [ 12.050625] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000058 [ 12.050627] Mem abort info: [ 12.050628] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 12.050630] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 12.050631] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 12.050632] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 12.050633] Data

Hi, Commit 63753b3e0dc56efb1acf94fa46f3fee7bc59281c x86: allow VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to work again on PVHVM guests Leaves HVM guests dangling after shutdown or destroy: xl list gives: (null) 16 0 4 --p--d 11.5 (null) 17 0 1 --ps-d 12.0 (first was destroyed, second shutdown) The

We need to write the irq number to GICC_DIR on the physical cpu that previously received the interrupt, but currently we are doing it on the pcpu that received the maintenance interrupt. As a consequence if a vcpu is migrated to a different pcpu, the irq is going to be EOI''ed on the wrong pcpu. This covers the case where dom0 vcpu0 is running on pcpu1 for example (you can test this

If the vgic needs to inject a virtual irq into the guest, but no free LR registers are available, add the irq to a list and return. Whenever an LR register becomes available we add the queued irq to it and remove it from the list. We use the gic lock to protect the list and the bitmask. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> --- xen/arch/arm/gic.c |

We weren''t taking the guest mode (CPSR) into account and would always access the user version of the registers. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- v2: Fix r8 vs r8_fiq thinko. --- xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 4 +- xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c | 4 +- xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c

Hello, While I was doing some tests in Arndale board, the network (iperf) throughput suddenly decreases to 5Mbps (from 100Mbps) out of nowhere. This typically happens when I generate traffic using iperf (100Mbps) while installing some packages using apt-get in dom0. Whenever this behavior happens, I can not see any distinguishable logs from any places. After some debugging, I found that

(moving to xen-devel, xen-arm is for the older PV ARM port) On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:59 +0000, Eric Trudeau wrote: > Hi, I am trying to build the XEN tools for our port of XEN to our > Cortex A15-based platform. > > I am using the repo at git://xenbits.xenproject.org/xen.git to > cross-compile the tools into our rootfs. Which branch/changeset are you using? I've heard that

Trap guest WFI, block the guest VCPU unless it has pending interrupts. Awake the guest vcpu when a new interrupt for it arrrives. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 6 ++++++ xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

(Amit pointed out that the patches never went out. This is a resend of the series meant to go out on 11/2/2011; I've marked it "v2".) This patchset applies to linux-next/next-20111102. This series implements support for multiple virtio_consoles using KVM. This patchset addresses several issues associated with trying to establish multiple virtio consoles. I'm trying to

(Amit pointed out that the patches never went out. This is a resend of the series meant to go out on 11/2/2011; I've marked it "v2".) This patchset applies to linux-next/next-20111102. This series implements support for multiple virtio_consoles using KVM. This patchset addresses several issues associated with trying to establish multiple virtio consoles. I'm trying to

(Amit pointed out that the patches never went out. This was a resend of the series meant to go out on 11/2/2011; Now it's a resend of the mail this morning, with everyone copied on the same mail. So sorry for the spam! This is v3.) This patchset applies to linux-next/next-20111102. This series implements support for multiple virtio_consoles using KVM. This patchset addresses several issues

(Amit pointed out that the patches never went out. This was a resend of the series meant to go out on 11/2/2011; Now it's a resend of the mail this morning, with everyone copied on the same mail. So sorry for the spam! This is v3.) This patchset applies to linux-next/next-20111102. This series implements support for multiple virtio_consoles using KVM. This patchset addresses several issues

(Amit pointed out that the patches never went out. This was a resend of the series meant to go out on 11/2/2011; Now it's a resend of the mail this morning, with everyone copied on the same mail. So sorry for the spam! This is v3.) This patchset applies to linux-next/next-20111102. This series implements support for multiple virtio_consoles using KVM. This patchset addresses several issues