similar to: About the CPU QoS and memory migratio

hello， I used the patch in xen4.1 and enabled it has the feature of numa placement,but has the earlier said problem.Can you help me that what is the reason? And where is the newest version of the patch，pls provide the latest development branch's address. Thanks, Regards, Butine huang Zhejiang University 2013-03-06 >On mer, 2013-03-06 at 10:49 +0000, butian huang wrote: >>

I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major Hardware failure.) How would one duplicate the SID, is that possible with 'smbpasswd -S' from the new Samba DC? Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997 Bug #: 1997 Summary: Add QoS to ControlPath escapes Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hi. I did send this to `jaazz@post.cz'', but I suspect the list is a more appropriate/useful place for it. It''s a question about Michal Charvat''s QoS extension to Net-SNMP. When I look at the MIB entries for the QoS handles, I get something like this - enterprises.qos.qosObjectTable.qosObject.qosHandle.0.0 = Gauge32: 0

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997 chrysn at fsfe.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrysn at fsfe.org --- Comment #3 from chrysn at fsfe.org --- Given the approach of distinguishing sockets based on their QoS has not led

Hi all, I have got one query on QoS in bridging in Linux My question is, when we define IP QoS ( using a tc command ) queuing discplines and classses, will these be applicable to bridged frames also ? I mean the packets that take IP path will be sent out according to QoS we defined, but the bridged/ swithced packets will also be sent according to this defined IP QoS classses ? My doubt is

I''ll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See: http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same

Hi I''m on my last year and I''m writing my final project about QoS support in Linux 2.4 kernels and, in general, about QoS in Linux OS. My professor asked me about future of QoS in Linux. And I asking you :) What are the difference between QoS subsystem in 2.4 and 2.6 kernels? What are the future plans for evolution of QoS support in Linux. -- Pozdrawiam Marcin

Bob, Have you looked at any of the products by Zyxel? With QOS, VPN & wireless support they have: For ADSL: Prestige 652HW Firewall/Router: Zywall 10W & 30W I'll be honest, I havn't used any of these yet. We were looking for similar products to suuport our VOIP installs. We just ordered some demo units from Zyxel, we shoul have them later this week. I'll let you know

I just wanted to drop a success notice to the list. We always hear the failures, and rarely the successes! ;-) After switching from FC1 and freeS/WAN ipsec to the new native linux 2.6 ipsec (ie: setkey-based) my QoS code suddenly started working properly! Previously, with FC1 and freeS/WAN, I found it impossible and rather buggy (kernel panics!) to get QoS to make any difference at all. My

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- The problem with this is that

Hello All, I am interested in QoS provided by Linux, when I looked into IP header I came accross ToS field, also while going more into detail about QoS I found that the QoS based on ToS is serviced thru DiffServ which in turn gives more priority to packets with higher value is ToS field, but I am not able to understand when we finally call dev->hard_start_xmit routine of underlying device

Hi, I''ve got 3 questions: 1) is it possible to do QoS and OpenVPN? I thought about doing QoS based on IP, as there''s a couple of servers here that need to be on a higher priority. 2) can anyone point me to a decent QoS how-to? 3) damn, I can''t remember what this one was. :o) Cheers, Fernando

Hello all, As I have promised I am sending my QoS rules. This now works fine with u32 classifier (and parent 1:0 that I could not understand why it did not worked well before). Att, Nataniel Klug ------------------------ #!/bin/sh #------ # Script de QoS Cyber Nett #------ # Nataniel Klug # suporte@cnett.com.br #------ TC="/sbin/tc" IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"

If I relay through my Cisco 7940/7960, does it do QOS, even with a dumb switch? I know you can set quality/qos but only if you have a layer2/layer3 switch that supports the tagging. A simple little linksys 5 port switch wouldn't know about QOS, it'd give everybody equal priority. If a computer plugged into the phone, and the phone into the dumb 5 port switch and then to the internet,

Greetings list, Thanks to all who replied to my thread a few days ago "SIP devices with packet loss tolerance". One of the suggestions that came out of that thread was to replace routers at users' premises with ones that support QoS. I've used m0n0wall's QoS in the past with reasonable success, but it's quite a bulky and complex setup for deploying to remote sites which

Good Day Everybody, I am in the process of planning a phone system for a small business (15 extensions - 4 PSTN lines [to be connected by ATAs]). The plan is to install an IP Phone everywhere there is an existing computer workstation - using the same LAN for phones and computers. The layout involves workstations connected to two switches (the unmanaged 'dumb' type) and the switches

Hi, I have what to me is an interesting issue. I am wanting to prioritize (QoS) traffic that will be passing through an IPSec (OpenS/WAN) VPN between two (identical) Linux routers. I know that I can apply the IPSec patches (1-4) to the kernel and IPTables (if they are not already applied by now) filter traffic before and after IPSec encapsulation. My problem is that I don''t know

I'm wondering if anyone knows of ISPs with service that has QoS features that would be good to use with VoIP stuff. Granted, the QoS would only be supported as long as you stayed within their network, but it might be better than nothing. --Eric

Hi I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge. Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0). Br0 have public IP. Eth0 connects to the internet. Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs). Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24). My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit. I''m doing SNAT for my Lan. QoS on eth0 works fine for DMZ, but is there a possibility to doing QoS on