similar to: How to get write checkin for xen.git tree?

I've seen a number of corrupted-index problems pop up on our test-dovecot servers (used by a few people at the office), and I'm wondering why corrupt indices don't just automatically get deleted ? Something like: if (!MAIL_INDEX_IS_IN_MEMORY(index)) { unlink(index->filepath); } in src/lib-index/mail-index.c:mail_index_set_error() comes to mind. It

I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this error: /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In static member function 'static bool llvm::DbgInfoIntrinsic::classof (const llvm::IntrinsicInst*)': /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h:77: error: 'dbg_declare' is not a member of 'llvm::Intrinsic'

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this error: Are you sure that no conflicts prevented updating from going smoothly? How are you building (srcdir ==/!= objdir)? -Chris > /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In static > member function 'static bool

Checkin 1.37 of src/lib-storage/mail-storage.c added a parameter to mailbox_open() but this broke building src/deliver/deliver.c as revision 1.2 doesn't use the new parameter. It looks like save_mail() of src/deliver/deliver.c calls mailbox_open() and it looks like it might work fine if it were to use a (struct istream *)0 as the third parameter (instead of the flags) -- but I don't use

I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This is on persephone. Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh tree and try to compile it? Rob On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: >> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get >> this

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This > is on persephone. > > Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh tree and > try to compile it? Nope, I don't think anyone else is getting this error. If you could try a fresh build that would be great, I'll fire

I've done several CVS head builds today .. no problems on Linux. Reid. On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 11:53 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > > > I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This > > is on persephone. > > > > Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh

I'm guessing the problem occurred because I hadn't updated in a while (maybe a couple of weeks?) and I had an old Intrinsics.gen file hanging around in my source directory that was getting picked up by the makefile for some reason. This is a bug, but maybe it's harmless because there's a onetime workaround (delete the file by hand) and it won't be a problem for

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:57:54PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > >Why not put all this into a pre-commit filter in CVS and be done with > >it? We'd never be bothered with it again as it would never be > >committed again. > > I'd rather not have CVS commit scripts mucking with the code. I think Reid means to have a

This is kind of an odd request so I''ve got the asbestos undies on. I have a client who currently has a layer 3 switch plugged into a cisco pix. Routing is handled via RIP and now the client wants to insert a linux box running shorewall behind the PIX and in front of the switch to act as a content filter+backup firewall. The immediate problem I forsee happening is that RIP broadcasts to

Hi I'm trying to change a commit message that became malformed when pushing to trunk svn propedit svn:log --revprop -r 243434 > svn: E175002: DAV request failed; it's possible that the repository's > pre-revprop-change hook either failed or is non-existent > svn: E175002: Repository has not been enabled to accept revision > propchanges; > ask the administrator to

> - Post-commit triggers need to be ported and kept useful > - Special attention to ensure that the existing code review / commit email > system continues to be effective As an aside: Would it be possible/practical for the PR/bug numbers to be written in a consistent format in checkin descriptions such that the commit email machinery hyperlinks to the actual bug, perhaps? (I haven't

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > lost wrote: >> Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > > You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. > Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call > JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. > > I

Hi: Recently I have some study on linux container(lxc), which is a light weight OS level virtualization. With the previous knowledge of tapdisk, I have an assumption that, I may could use the vhd for each container to seperate the storage of all containers, or even in later days, vhd is stored in distributed storage, container could be migrated. Build filesystem on tapdev

+1 for batching. In practice it's probably more important that things get run for every MLIR checkin, and not necessarily for every LLVM checkin. Steve On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:26 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Indeed there is quite a backlog here right now: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/mlir-windows and here >

Mike Stump wrote: > On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> Can you please just respond to the specific patch on llvm-commits >> instead >> of emailing llvm-dev? > > Don't happen to know which checkin caused it... Given that there's only ever been one checkin to this file, it can't be that hard. :) But I'm not sure what it's

On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > Can you please just respond to the specific patch on llvm-commits > instead > of emailing llvm-dev? Don't happen to know which checkin caused it...

I'm using AMI on Asterisk 1.2.15 and I'm having problems with DBPut action. If I execute this: Action: DBPut Family: checkin Key: 316 Val: yes Response: Error Message: Missing action in request I don't put anything in Asterisk DB. If I execute this: Action: DBPut Family: <checkin> Key: <316> Val: <yes> Response: Success Message: Updated database successfully

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Mike Stump wrote: >> On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> Can you please just respond to the specific patch on llvm-commits >>> instead >>> of emailing llvm-dev? >> >> Don't happen to know which checkin caused it... > > Given that there's

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:42, Xen patchbot -unstable wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User smh22@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > # Node ID 59e76450e286240decceda23eca343ec4604124f > # Parent 48dea637aac96bcbabe788d036b52570520cc82e > Fixes. Sorry, but could we not make checkin comments like "Fixes."? It would just take a few more seconds to describe it in a complete