similar to: [PATCH] xen: consolidate implementations of LOG() macro

Hi all, I don't find the solution to my problem . I represent some points and i would like a title for the x axis. I would like to write log_2 where 2 is a subscript of log. I think i have to use the functions parse or expression but i have some difficulties to understand how i should use them. Thanks --

Hi , I compiled the qosd-0.0.1-13122003.tgz code found in http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/ , but i have a problem when i run it , i get an error rtnetlink call failed, reason: 2 , no such file or directory i found this line in the file delete_object_util.c rtnl_talk(&rth, &req.n, 0, 0, NULL,NULL,NULL); result=errno; if(result!=0)

Dear all, Philip Stark and I think we have found a problem with how R generates random samples, resulting from how it generates random integers between 1 and n. (If we are reading the code correctly, the method is to multiply a pseudo-random binary fraction by n, take the floor, and add 1; this suffers from quantization effects that can get quite large when n is just below 2^31). A better

This round implements all of the review comments from V2 and all patches are now acked. Unless there are any objections I intend to apply later this morning. Ian.

So I''m writing my (dis)adventure with btrfs here hoping to help the developers or someone with similar problems. I had a btrfs filesystem at work, using two 1TB disks, raid1 for both data and metadata. A week ago one of the two disks start having hundreds of relocated sectors, so I decide to change it. I remove the failing disk, mount with -o degraded and every works fine. The day later

>Trolling is such fun, isn't it? I was trying to making merriment, not to provoke emotional responses. I am conflicted on publicly responding, but decided to clarify just in case your confusion is shared by others with better impulse control. Unfortunately, an unchallenged statement made in the company or under the scrutiny of experts is often assumed true, which is really the original

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:00:46PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > Hi, > > I am starting a thread to discuss the design of DataFlowSanitizer, > a compiler instrumentation based analysis tool which I am hoping to > bring into LLVM. As a starting point, I have included the current > version of the design document below. Comments are appreciated. Any further comments on the

Hi, If there are no further comments on the design below I intend to commit my DFSan patches in a week. Thanks, Peter On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:13:49PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:00:46PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am starting a thread to discuss the design of DataFlowSanitizer, > > a compiler

Hi, I am starting a thread to discuss the design of DataFlowSanitizer, a compiler instrumentation based analysis tool which I am hoping to bring into LLVM. As a starting point, I have included the current version of the design document below. Comments are appreciated. Thanks, Peter DataFlowSanitizer Design Document ********************************* This document sets out the design for

Le jeu 15/01/2004 à 15:30, Daniel Vogel a écrit : > Unrelated, but please use SSE/MMX/... intrinsics on Windows instead of using > inline assembly so you also get the speed benefit on Win64. OK, so here's a first start. I've translated to intrinsics the asm I sent 1-2 days ago. The result is about 5% slower than the pure asm approach, so it's not too bad (SSE asm is 2x faster

Hi, To increase the stack size, you can increase the value in the speex_alloc() call in nb_celp.c. Let me know if it solves the problem. Also, what compiler are you using. I think some older versions of gcc may have problems with SSE intrinsics. Jean-Marc Le mardi 19 avril 2005 ? 16:02 +0200, jehan Monnier a ?crit : > Hi, > > I also tried to build speex 1.1.7 with sse enabled on a

Let GK20A's instmem take advantage of the IOMMU if it is present. Having an IOMMU means that instmem is no longer allocated using the DMA API, but instead obtained through page_alloc and made contiguous to the GPU by IOMMU mappings. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file

Introduce Cortex-A7 with a scalable proc_info_list which including cpu id and cpu initialize function. In head.S, search cpu specific MIDR in procinfo and call such initialize function. Currently, support Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15. Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bjzhang@suse.com> --- changes since v2 1), define cpu_init function instead of assemble jump code in struct proc_info_list 2),

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <b></b>Hi,<br> <br> I also tried to build speex

I tried building speex with SSE, and found that it crashes for me here: [This is on RH=8.0]: # libtool gdb ./src/speexenc GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2.1-4) [...] This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) r --rate 8000 --16bit -n /dev/zero /tmp/foo Starting program: /usr/src/speex-1.1.7/src/.libs/lt-speexenc --rate 8000 --16bit -n /dev/zero /tmp/foo Encoding 8000 Hz audio

In mdct.c there's some functions including some-point butterfly. In 32-point and 16-point there are calling of smaller-point function everytime twice on each half of data. When I looked on it I found that's just linear algebra. So it can be rewritten to matrix multiplication. Some one can say: there's optimization on in register working. But imagine there's one calling 32-point,

All, Attached is a patch that does two things. First it makes the use of the current SSE code a run time option through the use of speex_decoder_ctl() and speex_encoder_ctl It does this twofold. First there is a modification to the configure.in script which introduces a check based upon platform. It will compile in the sse assembly if you are on an i?86 based platform by making a

Dear R users, I am looking for a reference to an algorithm for estimation of sample quantiles which does not require bringing the whole data into memory (more precisely its memory complexity should be much less than linear, ideally constant). I realize that such an algorithm can only be approximate and actually quite wrong for some samples, but that's fine with me. Thank you, Vadim

The following popt files need patches in order to compile using Compaq C on OpenVMS. These patches should also be needed on a Tru64 or LINUX on ALPHA using Compaq C. Except for the alloca issue, these should work on any ANSI compliant compiler. Operating System: OpenVMS ALPHA V7.3 Compiler: Compaq C T6.5 Compiler switches: /WARN=ENABLE=(LEVEL4, QUESTCODE) SYSTEM.H is doing tests on

System: Linux 2.4.25, glibc-2.3.2, gcc-3.2.3 (weird palindrome there), on a Williamette core Pentium 4 (1.6Ghz) system. I've tried both speex 1.1.5 release, and the current CVS (which self-IDs as 1.1.4), and the result is the same. I suspect some funk in the use of the SSE intrinsics macros. Backtrace: #0 0x40024594 in filter_mem2_10 (x=0x805f31c, _num=0x8061fb8, _den=0x8061fe4,