similar to: Xen 4.2.1 boot failure with IOMMU enabled

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Xen 4.2.1 boot failure with IOMMU enabled"

2013 Jul 22
69
[xen-unstable] Commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, makes dom0 boot process stall several times.
Hi Jan, After commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, booting dom0 stalls several times. Sometimes this results in RCU stall warnings from the dom0 kernel, hitting the "any" key, on normal or serial console, makes the boot continue for a while but it stalls several times. (It also stalls on shutdown BTW) I have
2013 Jan 04
3
Xen 4.2.1 boot failure with IOMMU enabled
Hi all I have a problem with enabling IOMMU on Xen 4.2.1. When I enable it in BIOS and in grub.conf using iommu=1 kernel option, my machine cannot boot. I get a following error on serial console: (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: (XEN) Xen BUG at pci_amd_iommu.c:35 (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... Error says
2013 Feb 27
8
VGA passthrough radeon 4850 as primary card
Hi all I''m trying to enable VGA passthrough in linux domU without success. I want to pass through AMD Radeon HD 4850 - 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV770 [Radeon HD 4850] as a _primary_ VGA for the VM. Nothing is showing up on the monitor that I have connected to graphics card''s HDMI port. I have IOMMU enabled. I searched mailing lists
2020 Sep 06
2
pcieport 0000:00:01.0: PME: Spurious native interrupt (nvidia with nouveau and thunderbolt on thinkpad P73)
Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because I can't quite tell if the issue is: - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be triggered if I have a USB-C yubikey in the port. With 5.7, my issues went away if I removed the USB key during boot, showing an interaction
2012 Sep 05
3
BTRFS thinks device is busy [kernel 3.5.3]
Hi, I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3 HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched) (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/) SANOS1:/media # uname -a Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now /dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10) SANOS1:/media #
2013 May 24
3
[BUG, PATCH] xen-4.1-3 xend/XendDomainInfo.py#device_configure() TypeError
Hello, I noticed a bug in Xen-4.1-3, which is also still present in xen+git. I know that the Python xend is deprecated, but I''m stuck with xen-4.1 until xen is usable with libvirt, so my patch might still be helpful for others. This is a follow-up to <http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2012-11/msg00069.html>, which still keeps me busy. /xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py
2009 Feb 26
2
BUG: Mount/Unmount Loop
Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sources from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git - System runs as z/VM guest - 3 Virtual CPUs - 1 GB RAM Storage ## Initial Test Setup - Setup a Debian SID System with
2013 Aug 28
12
[PATCH V2] x86/AMD-Vi: Add additional check for invalid special->handle
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> This patch add an additional logic to check for the often case when the special->handle is not initialized due to firmware bugs. but the special->usedid is correct. If users overide this using the command line option ivrs_ioapic, then it should use the value instead. --- This patch is supposed to follow the patches:
2011 Nov 22
1
Recovering data from old corrupted file system
I have a corrupted multi-device file system that got corrupted ages ago (as I recall, one of the drives stopped responding, causing btrfs to panic). I am hoping to recover some of the data. For what it''s worth, here is the dmesg output from trying to mount the file system on a 3.0 kernel: device label Media devid 6 transid 816153 /dev/sdq device label Media devid 7 transid 816153
2012 Apr 23
5
'filesystem resize max' tries to use devid 1
Back story: I started my pool with a 200gb partition at the end of my drive (sdc5) , until I was able to clear out the data at the beginning of my drive. When I was ready, I ran `btrfs dev add /dev/sdc4 /` then `btrfs dev del /dev/sdc5 /`, $ sudo btrfs fi resize max / Resize ''/'' of ''max'' ERROR: unable to resize ''/'' - Invalid argument in
2013 May 13
7
Remove a materially failed device from a Btrfs "single-raid" using partitions
Hello, I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8. I''ve created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard drives has failed, I mean it''s materially dead. :~$ sudo btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: 40886f51-8c9b-4be1-8721-83bf5653d2a0 Total devices 5 FS bytes used 226.90GB devid 4 size 37.27GB used 31.01GB path /dev/sdd1
2013 Oct 07
2
Some questions after devices addition to existing raid 1 btrfs filesystem
Hi, I have added 2x2Tb to my existing 2x2Tb raid 1 btrfs filesystem and then ran a balance: # btrfs filesystem show Total devices 4 FS bytes used 1.74TB devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdd devid 4 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sde devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdb # btrfs
2012 May 04
2
btrfs scrub BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
I think I have some failing hard drives, they are disconnected for now. stan {~} root# btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: d71404d4-468e-47d5-8f06-3b65fa7776aa Total devices 2 FS bytes used 6.27GB devid 1 size 9.31GB used 8.16GB path /dev/sde6 *** Some devices missing Label: none uuid: b142f575-df1c-4a57-8846-a43b979e2e09 Total devices 8 FS bytes used
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH] xfstests: update filters and output of btrfs/006
The btrfs-progs tools changed the output: - 100GiB instead of 100GB - The number of spaces was changed Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- common/filter | 2 +- common/filter.btrfs | 3 ++- tests/btrfs/006 | 6 +++--- tests/btrfs/006.out | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git
2012 Jan 13
5
Can't resize second device in RAID1
Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all
2012 Sep 27
18
[PATCH 09/11] add iomem support to libxl
This patch adds a new option for xen config files for directly mapping hardware io memory into a vm. Signed-off-by: Matthew Fioravante <matthew.fioravante@jhuapl.edu> diff --git a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 index 013270d..428da21 100644 --- a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 +++ b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 @@ -496,6 +496,17 @@ is given in hexadecimal and may either a span e.g.
2009 Nov 05
7
Unexpected ENOSPC on a SSD-drive after day of uptime, kernel 2.6.32-rc5
I''ve just finished installing onto an OCZ Agilent v2 SSD with btrfs as filesystem. However to my surprise I''ve hit an ENOSPC condition one one of the partitions within less than a day of uptime, while the filesystem on that partition only reported 50% to be in use, which is far from the 75% limit people mention on the ML. Note that this occurs using a vanilla 2.6.32-rc5 kernel
2013 May 10
5
Btrfs balance invalid argument error
Hi list, I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b. I have a three disk array of level single: # btrfs fi sh Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.55TB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 2.73TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb
2011 May 25
7
[PATCH] libxl: use preferred syntax for network device creation with upstream qemu
# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1306311631 -3600 # Node ID 6b1fe0cba8a2f0bcc1274c8e777da5b6c198b45d # Parent 8258c5a0ba35de937597e2c516bc88f8ebe1be35 libxl: use preferred syntax for network device creation with upstream qemu Markus Armbruster points out in <m3r582pzc1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> on qemu-devel that this is the prefered syntax
2008 Jun 05
6
slog / log recovery is here!
(From the README) # Jeb Campbell <jebc at c4solutions.net> NOTE: This is last resort if you need your data now. This worked for me, and I hope it works for you. If you have any reservations, please wait for Sun to release something official, and don''t blame me if your data is gone. PS -- This worked for me b/c I didn''t try and replace the log on a running system. My