similar to: [blkfront] max_segments & max_segment_size

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "[blkfront] max_segments & max_segment_size"

2012 Aug 21
5
[PATCH 1/2 v1] blkdrv: Add queue limits parameters for sg block drive
This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files
2012 Aug 21
5
[PATCH 1/2 v1] blkdrv: Add queue limits parameters for sg block drive
This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files
2023 May 10
3
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: u32 v, max_size; max_size = virtio_max_dma_size(vdev); -> implicit convert err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX,
2023 May 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > >
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > > max_size =
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > > max_size =
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > >
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:44?AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2012 Feb 20
11
btrfs-convert processing time
Hi, I''m trying to convert two ext4 FS to btrfs, but I''m surprised by the time needed to do that conversion. The first FS is on a 500GiB block device, and btrfs-convert is running since more than 48h : root 1978 25.6 47.7 748308 732556 ? D Feb18 944:44 btrfs-convert /dev/vg-backup/backup The second is on a 340GiB block device, and the processing time is similar
2019 Jul 25
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
Hi, On 7/23/19 5:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:36:09PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> index c8be1c4f5b55..37c143971211 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ size_t
2019 Jul 25
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
Hi, On 7/23/19 5:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:36:09PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> index c8be1c4f5b55..37c143971211 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ size_t
2012 Aug 16
0
[RFC v1 3/5] VBD: enlarge max segment per request in blkfront
refactoring balback Signed-off-by: Ronghui Duan <ronghui.duan@intel.com<mailto:ronghui.duan@intel.com>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c index 73f196c..b4767f5 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(reqs, "Number of blkback requests to
2012 Aug 16
0
[RFC v1 5/5] VBD: enlarge max segment per request in blkfront
add segring support in blkback Signed-off-by: Ronghui Duan <ronghui.duan@intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c index 45eda98..0bbc226 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ static int xen_blkif_reqs = 64; module_param_named(reqs, xen_blkif_reqs, int, 0);
2018 May 23
3
[PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
Convert the S_<FOO> symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents as using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more readable. see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945 Done with automated conversion via: $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS --fix-inplace <files...> Miscellanea: o Wrapped modified multi-line calls to a single line where
2018 May 23
3
[PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
Convert the S_<FOO> symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents as using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more readable. see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945 Done with automated conversion via: $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS --fix-inplace <files...> Miscellanea: o Wrapped modified multi-line calls to a single line where
2014 Nov 04
1
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
Hi, Sorry for the long delay. It prints exactly the same: [ 3.792033] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues) [ 3.802191] vda: vda1 vda2 < vda5 > A little bit more about my setup (if it helps): It's a qemu-system-x86_64 kvm instance with 16 cores and 10G of RAM. I can reproduce the bug every time with mkfs.btrfs on a 10GB LVM volume (right after the reboot). I
2014 Nov 04
1
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
Hi, Sorry for the long delay. It prints exactly the same: [ 3.792033] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues) [ 3.802191] vda: vda1 vda2 < vda5 > A little bit more about my setup (if it helps): It's a qemu-system-x86_64 kvm instance with 16 cores and 10G of RAM. I can reproduce the bug every time with mkfs.btrfs on a 10GB LVM volume (right after the reboot). I
2019 Jul 22
6
[PATCH 0/2] Fix NULL pointer dereference with virtio-blk-pci and virtual IOMMU
When running a guest featuring a virtio-blk-pci protected with a virtual IOMMU we hit a NULL pointer dereference. This series removes the dma_max_mapping_size() call in virtio_max_dma_size when the device does not have any dma_mask set. A check is also added to early return in dma_addressing_limited() if the dma_mask is NULL. Eric Auger (2): dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited against