similar to: [PATCH] qemu-xen-traditional: fix up security patches

flight 16014 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16014/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 15643-bisect test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 16012-bisect Tests which are failing

flight 15155 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15155/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 15130 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 15130 Tests which are failing intermittently

ZFS experts! cu is looking for _documentation_ about putting zone paths on zfs. cu is running 5.10 KP 137111-06. he needs to make sure u5 kp is ok with zone roots. Also has FSs mounted via legacy. So...anybody have documentation on which u5 or u6 of Solaris (NOT OpenSolaris) supports zfs, if any update, for zone paths? -Brian -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Sun#

Author: comay Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f3f67f97f86c549d01e2d2ac2e266624d9ba3238 Log message: PSARC 2006/124 Configurable Privileges for Zones 4966416 RFE: zone privileges should be configurable 5008923 zoneadm halt message is a little illogical when run from the target zone 5049028 Makefiles that hacked around libpool errors now need cleanup 6345758 zonecfg rctl help

Hello, This patch series adds an initial implementation of restriper (it''s a clever name for relocation framework that allows to do selective profile changing and selective balancing with some goodies like pausing/resuming and reporting progress to the user. Profile changing is global (per-FS) so far, per-subvolume profiles require some discussion and can be implemented in future.

Hi there! I am currently setting up a Xen box on 3 VLans, each VLan interface is in a bridge and currently, dom0 is reachable from on of these and is performing great. My only problem is with domU : it can ping anything but it won''t work for TCP and UDP protocol UNLESS I do a manual tcpdump on my vlan interface. Bridges on dom0: xen-vl97 8000.001372529fbf no

Hi. (Im am sending this to the "stable" list, because it maybe kernel related.. ) On 9.1-RELEASE I am witnessing lockups of the openldap slapd daemon. The slapd runs for some days and then hangs, consuming high amounts of CPU. In this state slapd can only be restarted by SIGKILL. # procstat -kk 71195 PID TID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 71195

Yesterday while fixing xoff stuckiness issue in the TUN/TAP driver I got a chance to look into the multicast filtering code in there. And immediately realized how terribly broken & confusing it is. The patch was originally done by Shaun (CC'ed) and went in without any proper ACK from me, Dave or Jeff. Here is the original ref

Yesterday while fixing xoff stuckiness issue in the TUN/TAP driver I got a chance to look into the multicast filtering code in there. And immediately realized how terribly broken & confusing it is. The patch was originally done by Shaun (CC'ed) and went in without any proper ACK from me, Dave or Jeff. Here is the original ref

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report, January-March 2013 Introduction This report covers FreeBSD-related projects between January and March 2013. This is the first of four reports planned for 2013. Highlights from this status report include the busy preparations of 8.4-RELEASE, restoration of binary package building, steady progress of several porting efforts, like work on the FreeBSD

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

Hi, during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, but on the other hand, we do not provide a small kernel-skeleton where you can load just the modules you need.

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to