similar to: HVM bug: system crashes after offline online a vcpu

On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 12:17 +0800, Joe Jin wrote: > Find a similar issue http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/265611 > So copied to Xen developer as well. > > On 06/27/13 13:31, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:58 +0800, Joe Jin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> When we do fail over test with iscsi + multipath by reset the switches

Hey, It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work over the weekend, so I can only surmise it is one the three patches. This is with a debug=y build (which has been working nicely for the last month or more). It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up. This used to work a day ago - that is c/s 23551 worked nicely. ----- Forwarded message

Hi experts I use xen-4.0.0 and dom0 is 2.6.33 and domU is 2.6.34 #lspci ............... 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06) 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:40:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If using indirect descriptors, you can make the total_sg as large as > you want. That would be a spec violation though, even if it happens to work on current QEMU. The spec says: A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue Size of the device. What prompted this patch? Do we ever encounter this

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:40:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If using indirect descriptors, you can make the total_sg as large as > you want. That would be a spec violation though, even if it happens to work on current QEMU. The spec says: A driver MUST NOT create a descriptor chain longer than the Queue Size of the device. What prompted this patch? Do we ever encounter this

Hello, I have a 5.5TB Btrfs filesystem on top of a md-raid 5 device. Now if i run some file operations like find, i get these messages. kernel is 2.6.38.5-1 on arch linux May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089713] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089834] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188

Hi, While updating my fedora rawhide installation, I got the Ooops listed at the end of the Email. Is this a known bug (I didn''t find anything specific), or should I file a bug? Thank you in advance, Clemens Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.495751] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] IP:

Hi guys, my computer suddenly failed to boot. It seams that it is unable to mount /home which is btrfs. Here are the messages I get during the boot (the relevant part; hopefully): Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6185! Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: Modules linked in: joydev coretemp kvm_intel kvm

NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive, non-raid. I have this server which has been dying randomly, with no logs. I had a tail -f over ssh for a week, when this just happened. Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel: mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort! (sc=ffff880057a0a080) Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel:

Hi Jan, After commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, booting dom0 stalls several times. Sometimes this results in RCU stall warnings from the dom0 kernel, hitting the "any" key, on normal or serial console, makes the boot continue for a while but it stalls several times. (It also stalls on shutdown BTW) I have