similar to: [PATCH, v3] fix build with XEN and EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP enabled but USB_SUPPORT disabled

Just like for the in-tree early console debug port driver, the hypervisor - when using a debug port based console - also needs to be told about controller resets, so it can suppress using and then re-initialize the debug port accordingly. Other than the in-tree driver, the hypervisor driver actually cares about doing this only for the device where the debug is port actually in use, i.e. it needs

On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is

On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is

On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is

Another bundle of issues from Coverity triage. The first one is in x86/mm, and looks scarier than it is. The others are all in xen/drivers and AFAICT are pretty minor. Cheers, Tim.

Jan, I was given a machine to diagnose a boot problem on xen 4.3, that used to work on 4.2, and have bisected to the following changeset: commit d0d4635d034f202bb401a6efa3ba61530f3854ab Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Thu Nov 22 10:47:58 2012 +0100 implement vmap() ... and use it as basis for a proper ioremap() on x86. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

It's an optimization opportunity! When behavior is undefined, we're free to interpret it to be "whatever makes optimization easiest." If the two do actually happen to alias, well, it's the programmer's fault anyways, because they were doing something undefined! --Owen On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote: > Hi! > > While investigating

Hi! While investigating into the PR1782 I spent some time analyzing BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp. While the mentioned problem should be fixed now (I hope), I have discovered some other possibilities for a bug to occur. In the case of checking for aliasing of two pointer values, where at least one of them is a GEP instruction with out-of-bound indices, BasicAliasAnalysis can return NoAlias, even if the

Hi guys and gals, I'm working on improving nouveau's support for MXM (Mobile PCI Express Module) chips and need some more data to check my implementation. To see if you can help, the first thing to do is jump over to /sys/firmware/acpi/tables and run "grep MXMS *". [root at nisroch tables]# grep MXMS * Binary file DSDT matches [root at nisroch tables]# If this isn't

On 11/15/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > > Sadly, this will break a very common idiom. In GCC, we discovered it > > to be common enough that it broke a *bunch* of C code. > > > > In particular, you will break > > > > struct foo { > > int a; > > char name[0]; > > } > > > > bar = malloc(sizeof

Hi, Daniel Berlin wrote: > Then the original reported code is fine, and the bug is in llvm or > llvm-gc (IE Owen is wrong) There is, actually, no problem with this example. I attached it, because it contains some specific programming technique, for which, after instcombining, a weird GEP is generated. I've pasted fragments of generated assembly code below, if someone is interested.

Sadly, this will break a very common idiom. In GCC, we discovered it to be common enough that it broke a *bunch* of C code. In particular, you will break struct foo { int a; char name[0]; } bar = malloc(sizeof (struct foo) + strlen("thisismyname") + 1); strcpy(bar->name, "thisismyname"); It only started turning up when we started doing higher level loop opts and used

Jan (or others), I'm seeing an issue with the EHCI debug port functionality, that I'm wondering whether it is a known limitation of the hardware, or if this is a bug. On a particular system that I had limited debug capabilities in the past (Dell Inspiron 15 i3) I am seeing the debug messages abruptly stop during boot, followed by garbage that looks like an uninitialized serial port:

The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line while inactive. Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting reset

It has never been used for anything, and Linux 3.7 doesn''t propagate this information anymore. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- Konrad, on the pv-ops side it may be better to pass zero rather than leaving the field completely uninitialized. --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c @@ -935,7 +935,6 @@ static void set_cx( }

Hi Jan, After commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, booting dom0 stalls several times. Sometimes this results in RCU stall warnings from the dom0 kernel, hitting the "any" key, on normal or serial console, makes the boot continue for a while but it stalls several times. (It also stalls on shutdown BTW) I have

Hi, I'm trying to build a hierarchical logistic regression model with lme4 package, but I have a problem on selecting the variables to include in this model. In a simple logistic regression, using Forward selection, i use a likelihood ratio test to check which variables i should include in the model, using the function add1(). The problem is that this function doesn't work with the

Hi, > Sadly, this will break a very common idiom. In GCC, we discovered it > to be common enough that it broke a *bunch* of C code. > > In particular, you will break > > struct foo { > int a; > char name[0]; > } > > bar = malloc(sizeof (struct foo) + strlen("thisismyname") + 1); > strcpy(bar->name, "thisismyname"); > > > It

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:25:04PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver > expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset > line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset > deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line > while inactive.