Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "xorg-x11"
2007 May 02
1
kbs-misc.repo
Good day all,
Are there going to be kbs-misc repo for centos 5?
Later
_________________________________________________________________
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5.375%* fix rate. Check savings
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2bbb&disc=y&vers=925&s=4056&p=5117
2007 May 12
1
VMware ver 1.03
I'm for not giving accurate information, I am able to create new virtual
machines as a non-root user. I have windowsXP and Ubuntu installed on my
hard drive as well. So I am trying to create a new virtual machine with
custom settings, and using my hard drive, so I can boot windowsXP or Ubuntu
while Im in CentOS 5. But when I reach to the end of the settings it tells
me I do not have
2007 Aug 09
0
VOIP Provider- Callcentric
Asterisk Users,
I am looking for Sip Providers for my Asterisk 1.2.13, running Debian Etch
system with McLeodUSA's T1 service.
Has anybody ever used Callcentric for their Sip Provider? Any service
issues with Callcentric?
Best Regards,
John
_________________________________________________________________
Messenger Caf? ? open for fun 24/7. Hot games, cool activities served daily.
2007 Aug 13
1
FXO Modules and Sip Outbound
Asterisk Users,
I have never done a dial plan for this scenario before. Is it possible to
have Sip Phones make outbound calls through the PSTN? What would the call
routing/dial plan would look like?
-John
_________________________________________________________________
Messenger Caf? ? open for fun 24/7. Hot games, cool activities served daily.
Visit now.
2007 Oct 10
1
Re: scp -t . - possible idea for additional parameter
>> I understand that that is not how scp works today.>And it will likely never change.
Why not? Just because "That's how we've always not done it" doesn't sound like a very good reason to me.
>> I'm suggesting that we make a minor change to how it works.>scp is maintained for compatibility reasons only, as I've understood>things.
That's still
2005 Feb 03
3
Preventing deletion of folders under a SAMBA share
I am trying to set up a basic Samba server and configure it so that
folders under a share cannot be deleted accidentally by a user. The
ideal scenario would be to have the top-level folders under the share
non-deleteable, but folders and files are able to be created under it.
I cannot find any easy way of doing this directly, but thought that the
use of the 'veto' option would work
2005 Feb 05
1
Preventing deletion of folders under a SAMBA share: SOLVED
Thanks for this. Yes this does work nicely, however the main reason
things weren't going to plan was quite simple. I had set force user =
root, in an attempt to ensure that all new folders were owned by root -
silly I know, but somehow overlooked, and was forcing each user to be
connected as root - doh!
All I need to accomplish now, is to prevent deletion of any folder
created by a user -
2010 Jun 15
4
Adding Domain User Accounts to Windows 7 Clients (Samba 3.4.8 PDC)
Hi,
I've searched the logs and google trying to find a fix for my problem
and have so far not succeeded.
I've got a Samba PDC (Debian Lenny), running Samba 3.4.8 from Debian
Backports. It is using an OpenLdap backend. We have encountered little
to no problems over the last several years. And of course, we have to
upgrade to Windows 7 (64-bit), from XP-64. So, here we are.
Following
2020 Apr 09
5
F18 upstreaming Finished!
Hi all
F18 merging has finished so commit access should be back to normal.
Thanks
Rich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Richard
> Barton via llvm-dev
> Sent: 9 April, 2020 16:08
> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: [llvm-dev] F18 upstreaming Now!
>
> Hi all
>
> We are about to merge F18
2014 Mar 20
10
Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? And, would
you care strongly if it went away (or would you just migrate to something
else)?
I bring this up because we are discussing dropping it from Fedora. This
would be far enough in the future that it wouldn't impact RHEL 7, and
therefore won't affect anyone here for Quite Some Time*, but here in the new
world order of
2020 Apr 07
3
F18 ready to be merged + preview of merge
Attached is the log.
I'm building with:
clang version 10.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
3a6da1122b990386edeba0987d0d1fdc9c8dc53d)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
On some Ubuntu-like distribution.
I also ran with ASAN once and it found a bunch of leaks in bin/tco.
Best,
--
Mehdi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:36 AM Richard Barton <Richard.Barton at
2017 Jul 27
3
What RH-like on a Dell XPS 15 (9590)?
Hello Matthew,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:27:47 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:25:25PM +0200, wwp wrote:
> > I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable
> > GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its
> > kernel can't run on this hardware.
>
> What sense of
2005 Feb 04
2
Logging in via Linux machine to Windows Domain
Hi List -
I have a friend that runs a Windows domain with Active Directory and is
setting up some new laptops with Redhat. He wants to automate installs,
etc. on these laptops as he would on a Windows machine.
Just wondering if anyone has any experience with this - and also if anyone
knows of a good tutorial for joining a Linux machine to a Windows domain.
I've heard that it is possible.
2020 Apr 07
3
F18 ready to be merged + preview of merge
Hi Mehdi,
I can't replicate those failures at my end, could you let me know what OS, compiler and CMake flags you're using so I can try and reproduce?
Thanks!
David Truby
________________________________
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Sent: 07 April 2020 06:44
To: Richard Barton
2010 Sep 15
3
why does automounting removable media always have options nodev, noexec, nosuid?
i'm experimenting with some basic removable media mounting
exercises for an upcoming class, and i read that, while you can use
gconf-editor to change some of the mount options in cases like that,
there is no way to override the mount options of nodev, noexec and
nosuid. for example, that claim is made here (admittedly for fedora,
but it appears to be true for centos as well):
2017 Jul 27
3
What RH-like on a Dell XPS 15 (9590)?
Did you already try current Centos? If yes what was the problem? Why it did
not work?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
> > Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all
> > options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
>
>
2019 May 30
4
Making loop guards part of canonical loop structure
I don't remember the details of the particular case where we encountered this, but I think the loop started with the condition check and ended with an unconditional branch back to the beginning.
--
Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com LLVM compiler development
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 3:00 PM
2005 Jul 24
1
CESA-2005:587 missing devhelp src.rpm
> src:
> devhelp-0.9.2-2.4.6.src.rpm
> mozilla-1.7.10-1.4.1.centos4.src.rpm
The mozilla src.rpm is there, but the devhelp one seems to be missing from
the mirrors....
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 76 degrees
2006 Oct 21
2
kdelibs update missing src.rpm
I looked on several mirrors, and nowhere seems to have it.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
2020 Mar 16
2
Upstreaming Flang - postponed to Monday 23rd March
Hi llvm-dev
We have not been able to complete all the work we need to do before merging F18 into LLVM as Flang so we will not be dong that today as previously announced.
We propose to slip this back a week to let us finish off the last bits of work. All code changes are in review as of Friday. If you want more detail, you can see the exact status here: