similar to: XCP 1.6 don’t pass throug all traffic to (tpcdump) snort

Hi all! I've expected a Problem with java bases application guis (here I use Veriats Volumen Manager). The usage of the right mouse button does not result in an action. Does anybody else have same problems? Client: WinNT, F-Secure SSH 4.0 CLient, Exceed Server: Solaris 2.6, OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 Randolf -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Randolf Skerka

Hello! Problem: Outbound data goes through default interface instead of specified, causing congestion. Question: How can I instruct samba to tell Solaris to SEND data through specified network interface? Detailed: I have a solaris filesserver with two network interfaces, hme0 and hme1. I'd like NFS to use hme0 and smb hme1. I intsruct samba to only listen for connections on the

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root

Hello... I have one 2Mbit WAN interfaces and two vlan LAN interfaces - vlan2 and vlan3. I''d like to limit bandwidth something like this: rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan2 and rate 1Mbit ceil 2Mbit for vlan3 with possibility to borrow bandwidth between vlan2 and vlan3. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Is it possible to do in any way? regards, -- Michal

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I''m playing around with VLAN''s and I have a VLAN capable (layer 2) smart switch. I see a steady stream of martians in the logfile if I have the routefilter option set on the loc zone interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I have two interfaces in the loc zone, eth1 and vlan2 respectively. vlan2 is an 802.1q trunk going towards the switch. Is this the expected behavior in

I think I may have fixed my memory leaks, and it may be that it was nothing to do with xen... the machine has been up for 10 days now which is the longest it has lasted in quite a while. I changed the way the bridges and vlans worked together, previously I had it configured thus: trunk = renamed Ethernet interface br0 = bridge of trunk and any domU I wanted on vlan1 br0.2 = vlan 2 on trunk br1 =

On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: > In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional > services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the primary benefits of virtualization and other containers is isolating the applications you run from the base OS. Putting services other

And additionally here are the detailed port configs on the switch end: hq>show interface Gi1/0/3 switchport Name: Gi1/0/3 Switchport: Enabled Administrative Mode: trunk Operational Mode: trunk Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Negotiation of Trunking: On Access Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Administrative

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional >> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes > > On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the >

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

Hi I have some problems with my vpn. Im running version 1.1pre15 on all nodes. I have four nodes in my network. Node1 -> connects to Node2 Node2 -> connects to Node1 Node3 -> connects to Node1 and Node2 Node4 -> connects to Node1 and Node2 The problem is the connection between Node3 and Node4. The traffic is going via Node1 and Node2. Its unstable. package drops almost all the time

Hey guys, I have a question regarding shorewall and vrf functionality. I have shorewall 3.4.8 and kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 I have tried to use iproute2 (ip route and ip rule) to establish multiple routing tables. The biggest problem seems to be, that I cannot add interfaces such as vlan interfaces to the routing table. My target is that linux takes attention of on which vlan interface

Hi all, I''m trying to put a linux GW running with this seput: Internet -> DSL Modem -> VLAN2 \ eth2.2 Linux > Lan eth2.3

I have the following problem, and I would l like to know if Samba can help. (I suspect that it cannot, but feel free to prove me wrong.) My scenario is this: My site is just one of many, with the `Domain Master Browser` being off-site. My site has 10 VLANS, and in the current, purely Windows environment I have assorted problems with the browser list being maintained across all 10 VLANS. I would

Hello all, We have just concluded a very drawn out test of our domain that is having some trust relationship problems with Windows 7 desktops. Here is a breakdown of our setup: roark PDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN 2 archives3 BDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN2 arrowhead BDC "home server" running samba 3.4.3 on VLAN 9 archives4 BDC

hey, first, i user bind 9.8.1 as my DNS backend Well, I have a domain controller, dc1.example.com, running correctly and with the following configurations... == smb.conf == [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = DC1 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes server services = -dns