similar to: "dynamic memory allocation" for windows guests?

I''m running Xen 4.1.4 on Fedora 17. I have some CentOS 6 DomUs - an haproxy machine and some tomcat VMs. When clients send requests with: POST /ProposalInterface HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml Host: www.myhost.co.uk Content-Length: 2099 Expect: 100-continue Connection: Keep-Alive The "continuation" doesn''t happen. The POST is truncated at 1449 bytes, and the

Hello, i have 3 XCP 1.0.0 hosts in a pool, one of them is not enabled: xe host-param-list uuid=402f07f4-99c0-4501-9787-8dee8984e313 uuid ( RO) : 402f07f4-99c0-4501-9787-8dee8984e313 name-label ( RW): xcp1.domain.com name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer allowed-operations (SRO):

Sorry for posting again, but because the subject.Hi All, I have 5 servers each: Intel Quad Core i7 2.4Gig (8 processors)2 *1TB HDD2*1Gig NIC12G RAM I installed XCP 0.5 on each and all are joining a resource pool.Then I installed 2 Centos 5.5 VM on each XCP host and I used the following command to specify the number of vCPUs for each VM: xe vm-param-set uuid=$VM_UUID VCPUs-max=4xe vm-param-set

# HG changeset patch # User hongkaixing<hongkaixing@huawei.com> # Date 1325149704 -28800 # Node ID 052727b8165ce6e05002184ae894096214c8b537 # Parent 54a5e994a241a506900ee0e197bb42e5f1d8e759 xenpaging:add a new array to speed up page-in in xenpaging This patch adds a new array named page_out_index to reserve the victim''s index. When page in a page,it has to go through a for loop

Hi all, So I have been playing around with XCP and the static/dynamic memory parameters. I have a few behavioral questions I would like to pin down: -Is the static-max quantity of free memory on the host always required before the guest vm can be started? I assume so since you don''t know a-priori if the guest you are booting supports Xen or not. But if this is true, what is the use of

I have a xen server setup that I want to install a lot of vms on if possible. The vms will have no utilization for the most part; and brief utilization when active. The server has 2GB of RAM. We were running into a problem were the dom0 would not let us add anymore vms because we were out of physical memory. I have started to read about memory ballooning and hoping someone could point me

Hello, I am running a functional Xen 4.0 platform. The objective is the project I am currently running is to replace 4 VMWare ESX by 4 Xen 4.0 hypervisors. I have been able to reproduce all the core VMWare features in Xen (but better of course =D) except memory overcommitment. I know this feature has been included since Xen 3.3 but I have found almost no information about it. When I try to

Hi David > Hi all, So I have been playing around with XCP and the static/dynamic > memory parameters. I have a few behavioral questions I would like to > pin down: > > -Is the static-max quantity of free memory on the host always > required before the guest vm can be started? I assume so since you > don''t know a-priori if the guest you are booting supports Xen or

I have a Samba 3.5 server that services seven Windows 7 computers. When the setup was originally installed, all workstations were independent systems and so all users had local administrative privilege. I have removed admin rights from all users but one. This user has a problem. We'll call the user 'dmc' though that isn't his real username. In any event, dmc is a member of the

[previously posted to xen-devel@ and xen-api@ but this might be of interest to xen-users@ too] Hi, I''ve refreshed the Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) .isos on xen.org with a new development snapshot (labelled version 0.1.1). XCP is a collaborative effort to build a complete cloud infrastructure platform, complete with a powerful management stack, standards-based APIs, support for multi-tenancy

I''ve been trying to migrate a win nt 4 machine to a xen domu for the past few months with no success. However, on my current attempt, the original hardware no longer boots, so I''m trying to resolve the issues with xen properly, or else take a long holiday... Anyway, the physical machine had a 9G drive (OS drive), a 147 G drive (not in use) and a 300G drive (all SCSI Ultra320 on

A user has pointed out a problem with GPLPV under Xen 4.2 when using PoD. I''m using the difference between XENMEM_maximum_reservation and XENMEM_current_reservation to tell me how much I should balloon down to account for PoD, but when the user has ballooned down to 1G (from 4Gb or 8GB), GPLPV logs the following: 13005008825593: XenPCI XENMEM_maximum_reservation = 262400

Dear Debian maintainer, The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf templates used in xen-api. This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with users and its aims are: - to improve the use of English in all debconf templates; - to make the wording of debconf templates more consistent; - to

Dear Wiza[R]ds, I have a data.frame header that looks like this: v2FfaPre15 v2FfaPre10 v2FfaPre5 v2Ffa2 v2Ffa3 v2Ffa4 I need it to look like this, 15 10 5 2 3 4 i.e., with v2FfaPre and v2Ffa stripped off Any suggestions, Thanks in advance! -- Oscar Oscar A. Linares, MD Translational Medicine Unit LaPlaisance Bay, Bolles Harbor Monroe, Michigan 48161

I have a kvm virtual host running on what will become CentOS 6 with 12GB of memory and a Quad Xeon X5560 2.8Ghz . The store for virtual machines will be a software raid 6 array of 6 disks with an LVM layered on top. I'm not initially planning any major overcommitment of resources, though there could be a need for some overcommitment with a light workload on the guests. In recent years

Hello everyone, I´m new to the list and I´m doing some research on all virtualization products and solutions avaiable, and I have two questions about Xen: - Does it use have memory overcommitment techniques (ballooning, TMPS, swapping)? - Does it do software thin provisioning? - I read it has a very strong point when using paravirtualization with Linux systems. Does it have any other kind of

Hi all! We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern questions which we're fumbling with. So if you know anyone who is using it in production? If, so, how? In particular, would you be happy with guests simply giving the host back whatever memory they can spare (as Xen's self-balloon does)?

Hi all! We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern questions which we're fumbling with. So if you know anyone who is using it in production? If, so, how? In particular, would you be happy with guests simply giving the host back whatever memory they can spare (as Xen's self-balloon does)?

Hi everyone, The first release candidate of the Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) version 0.5 is now available for testing from: http://www.xen.org/products/cloud_source_0.5.html XCP-0.5 is intended to be a *stable* release, suitable for long-term production use. Please download this release candidate and give it a thorough workout! Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ xen-api

Hi everyone, The first release candidate of the Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) version 0.5 is now available for testing from: http://www.xen.org/products/cloud_source_0.5.html XCP-0.5 is intended to be a *stable* release, suitable for long-term production use. Please download this release candidate and give it a thorough workout! Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ xen-api