similar to: Xen 4.1 kernel error on the IBM x3650 M4

> On May 13, 2016, at 16:27, I wrote: > > Is there any known incompatibility with the latest 32-bit (i386) CentOS 6 and the latest Lenovo x3650 M5 servers? I?ve been running i386 CentOS 6.X on 3 year old x3650 M4 servers without any issues. Our development environment has not been ported to 64-bit (x86_64) yet, so we are stuck using i386 for another few months. When I try to boot from

Is there any known incompatibility with the latest 32-bit (i386) CentOS 6 and the latest Lenovo x3650 M5 servers? I?ve been running i386 CentOS 6.X on 3 year old x3650 M4 servers without any issues. Our development environment has not been ported to 64-bit (x86_64) yet, so we are stuck using i386 for another few months. When I try to boot from the netinstall ISO image I just get a ?Boot Failed?

Another day, another apparant unexplained hardware incompatibility. I have a TE412P and a TDM400B living quite happily in a whitebox using an Intel motherboard: http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/se7230nh1-e/index.htm I tried to move to an IBM x3650 system. It uses a slightly newer chipset, but apparantly it's in the same family. The SE-7230 board has been EOL'd and the

Hi,all, Is there anyone which installed xen on ibm system x3650? I read a link from redhat: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_46_10304.shtm That is running xen guests on System x3950 is not recommended. I installed rhel5.1 x86_64 on a ibm system x3650 with xen kernel,but I can not install guest with paravirtualizing,the guest os include rhel5.1 32/64bit rhel4.5/32bit the guest crashed when the

Hi, I have a debian etch/xen installation on a IBM x3650 with a default xend-config.sxp. After running the network-bridge script, I can''t reach the network. It works if I use a configuration like the one mentionned on this site but I don''t think it''s clean: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-01/msg01347.html Here''s the output of

Hello Asterisk Community, Does somebody had used an IBM X3650 server with Asterisk? we would like to know if this servers are reliable and works OK with linux and Asterisk? Does some of you has this servier with asterisk on production? should we install an special BIOS (linux bios) in order to make this work better? Regards -- Saludos Danny Dias SkypeID: danny.dias1 -------------- next part

On 5/13/2016 1:27 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote: > Is there any known incompatibility with the latest 32-bit (i386) CentOS 6 and the latest Lenovo x3650 M5 servers? I?ve been running i386 CentOS 6.X on 3 year old x3650 M4 servers without any issues. Our development environment has not been ported to 64-bit (x86_64) yet, so we are stuck using i386 for another few months. you do know, x86_64 runs

Greetings, I am trying to install Centos 5.3 on IBM x3650 with Adaptec based ServeRAID 8k Just two disk in RAID 1 When trying boot with CD1 the booting process aborts with a kernel panic saying that some unknown-de and some message saying to use the correct 'root=' boot parameter. Kindly help Thanks and Regards Rajagopal

On Fri 06/Sep/2013 10:12:29 +0200 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >> I tried GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN="dom0_mem=8192M": that delivers 6964868K total, then >> crashes when used=2837436K free=4127432K. > > On a modern dom0 kernel you need to specify the maximum memory as well, > i.e. dom0_mem=8192M,max:8192M

On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Package: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 > Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 > Severity: normal > > I tried GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN="dom0_mem=8192M": that delivers 6964868K total, then > crashes when used=2837436K free=4127432K. > By crash I mean the gnome screen was blown away, replaced by a black screen > with white log

Hey Guys ! I am trying to install Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS on a 64-bit machine. Basically the issue that I am facing is that when I try to boot up my Domain0, my video display driver crashes and the system simply hangs. I am using an Intel graphics card: $ lspci -v | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) I

On 14/05/16 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 19:10 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> If somebody is still running wheezy for their dom0 (host) environment >> and they are using jessie or other systems with grub2 in their VMs, they >> can't boot their VM. >> >> A rather trivial 1-line fix in the dom0

Hi, I''m trying to install Xen on Ubuntu 11.04. I read somewhere (please correct me if this is wrong) that Ubuntu hasn''t had dom0 support since 8.04 LTS, and the recommended action was to grab a dom0-enabled kernel from Debian, so I did. I''m running 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 and built Xen 4.1.1 from source. After installation and some troubleshooting, I tried to start

I'm running Samba 4.1.6 with Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Little Endian on a Power 8 box. As I said in a previous post, I can't mount any share from machine. I tried the same configuration with Samba 4.1.11 on Ubuntu 14.10 Little Endian on Power 8, and it works fine. I'm probabily wrong, but is there a bug in the binary distribution of Samba on Ubuntu 14.04.01 Little Endian, maybe

m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 59003aea7d25c962c3332db28222b4241f68fdda Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Tue Oct 30 10:40:04 2007 +0100 make second and third arguments to AS_COMPILER_FLAG optional diff --git a/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 b/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 index f706196..76cf4cd 100644 ---

Hi, I've (just now) been playing with a buildbot, building ogg, vorbis, speex, and theora, using a non-standard prefix on a pretty bare debian image. I noticed that vorbis was failing during configure while theora wasn't. I tracked it down to the location of ogg.m4. There is a copy of ogg.m4 in theora/m4, but there is not one in vorbis/m4. This means that if you have libogg installed

OK. Digging into this... sendmail.m4 has the lines: define(`FAX_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/faxmail')dnl define(`FAX_MAILER_ARGS',`faxmail -d -n -p 12pt $u@$h $f')dnl MAILER(`fax')dnl proto.m4 has: `R$+ < @ $+ .FAX. > $#fax $@ $2 $: $1 user at host.FAX', `ifdef(`FAX_RELAY', `R$*<@$+.FAX.>$* $:

It looks like the change to m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 in r1968 broke the test on at least Solaris 10. Here is one possible fix. ---------------------------- --- m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4.old 2009-12-15 09:30:48.000000000 -0800 +++ m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 2009-12-15 11:12:15.291295000 -0800 @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ if test -z "${nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen}"; then

Greetings everyone. I have 2 quick questions about ao/ao.m4, ogg/ogg.m4, and vorbis/vorbis.m4. 1. Is there any reason that the macros are named AM_PATH_AO, AM_PATH_OGG, and AM_PATH_VORBIS? Can we change them to something else? I ran into a problem when trying to add support for ogg/vorbis into a package today: Automake assumes that anything beginning with AM_ belongs to automake -- these two

Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016, at 13:45, James Aylett wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:12:25PM +0200, rsto at paranoia.at wrote: > > The FastMail snippet generator has been written when MSet didn't create > > snippets. I'll first compare both implementations to see if there is a > > good reason for them to coexist, or might just as well merge any > > additional