similar to: Issue with domU RX throughput

Hi, Whats' the best motherboard you ever ran CentOS on? --------- Don't read this unless you have lots o' spare time, and please, no flamers or kook-jobs with wierd attitudes, this is just plain old hardware as it relates to centos talk -no politic or mean folks. Background (why I ask about centos-friendly hardware): As I order alot of servers, I have alot of vendors telling me

On 09/04/2018 01:51 AM, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > As an alternative to the XPS15 there's the new Inspiron 15 7000 series and the Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme (though I have no idea if either of them runs CentOS 7). I have a Dell Inspiron 13 (8th generation) that I bought from Costco. I am running CentOS 7 on it. I was told that it has the same hardware of XPS 13. Most things work well out

I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence from using ndiswrapper to the bcm43xx module, as explained on that wiki page), I've been having packet loss and/or collision on the

Hi, After our upgrade from Samba 3.x to 4.1.6 we are having major performance issues. Today, I've been able to nail it down to a simple test case. What strikes me is that Windows XP takes about 25 seconds for one job, while it only costs 3 seconds on Windows 7. I have two tests: 1000 files of 10k each (total ~10Mb): * Linux on localhost or a remote host (1GE or 10GE): 5.5 seconds *

I''ve idendified the problem... description: problem in XEN bridged-network. Dom0 doesn''t respond at external network activity (DomUs may work correctly) problem: something related to Broadcom NetXtreme II menagement solution: follow all this instructions: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hardware.dell.poweredge/23276 bye, s.

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

-----Original message----- > From:H <agents at meddatainc.com> > Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 14:52 > To: Centos Mailing List <centos at centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] Centos on Dell XPS15 > > Is anyone successfully running Centos 7 on a Dell XPS15? If so, which model? If not, what was the problem? > > Thank you! I only ran Fedora 28 Workstation Live from

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:31 AM Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > > Matthieu Hautreux wrote: > > The change proposed by Cyril in sftp is a very pragmatic approach to > > deal with parallelism at the file transfer level. It leverages the > > already existing sftp protocol and its capability to write/read file > > content at specified offsets. This enables

Subject: Teo En Ming's Learning Achievements on 14 August 2020 Friday [1] Activate Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN License on Cisco ASA 5506-X Firewall Today I discovered that the base license for Cisco ASA 5506-X Firewall only allows maximum 2 SSL VPN users. I had to login to https://www.cisco.com/go/license, assign the PAK/token to the serial number of Cisco ASA 5506-X firewall and perform a

Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a firmware issue? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090401/7c80deca/attachment-0003.sig>

Begging indulgence of the list - asking here because due to the higher likelyhood of getting an answer... I have an application that often loses connection from one machine to another when one (or more) of the machines has particular brands of 1gig nics, but which runs rock solid when on 10meg nics and some 1 gig nics. The application senses (falsely) that the connection has been shut down

I have seen the following kernel panic 5 times today on three different machines, two of which had been stable for months and one of which is a brand new install. We are running the x86_64 xen kernel and userland tools that came in the Xen 3.1.0 tarball from xen.org, on top of scientific linux (redhat clone) 5.1 or 5.2. <Aug/28 12:21 pm>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

Hi, I'm trying to implement the TTI hooks for AMDGPU to avoid unrolling loops for operations with huge expansions (i.e. integer division). The values that are ultimately reported by opt -cost-model -analyze (the actual cost model tests) seem to not matter for this. The huge cost I've assigned division doesn't prevent the loop from being unrolled, because it isn't actually

Hi list, I have a set of 300 or so WAV files I was combining and playing using playback/background in 1.4.X. Now that I have moved on to the 10.0 set, I understand that I can replace my 8 Khz mono files with virtually unlimited Khz mono files (still no stereo, but a quantum leap forward). I've played with this and get good throughputs using SLIN44 formats on SIP. The 2 questions

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On Nov 19, 2016 10:26 AM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com<mailto:spatel at rotateright.com>> wrote: > > If I have my FMA intrinsics story straight now (thanks for the explanation, Hal!), I think it raises another question about IR canonicalization (and may affect the proposed revision to IR FMF): No, I think that we specifically

The potential advantage I was considering would be more accurate cost modeling in the vectorizer, inliner, etc. Like min/max, this is another case where the sum of the IR parts is greater than the actual cost. Beyond that, it seems odd to me that we'd choose the longer IR expression of something that could be represented in a minimal form. I know we make practical concessions in IR based on

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

Hi All, I'm tring to use RSQRT instructions on follow case for ARM (now what using is sqrt): 1.0 / sqrt(x) The RSQRT instructions(VRSQRTE/VRSQRTS) are vector type, but above operation is scalar type. So a transformation must be done(transform sqrt pattern to rsqrt). I have completed a patch for this, but I made the transformation in the backend which will leads to additional

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

Hello, i just came across the sparse-block patch. i`m using rsync to store vmware vmdk virtual disks to a zfs filesystem. vmdk files have large portions of zeroed data and when thin provisioned (not being used yet), they even may be sparse. on the target, after writing to zfs the zeroes are always efficiently stored/compressed, i.e. they take no additional space on zfs. is this patch worth a