similar to: 99% iowait on one core in 8 core processor

Hello All, I have 2 Digium card configure on Single machine, which can't share interrupt across all CPUs and sometimes asterisk reach 100% CPU usage. Here is system details and /proc/interrupt o/p. OS: CentOS 6.4 Kernel: 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 Dahdi Version: DAHDI Version: 2.7.0.2 Echo Canceller: HWEC Asterisk Version: 1.8.13.0 Output: /proc/interrupts cat /proc/interrupts

Asterisk users, I posted the following email to the Fedora users list <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-March/msg04154.html> and it got no responses, so now I'm calling on your expertise. Please take a look at it and share your knowledge on the subject with me. Additionally, let me know if you believe what I am trying to do is critically flawed. It's possible

(copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be overkill. Would it? I thought irqbalance is actually required even for native with

On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 03:10 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > (copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be

Has anyone had any compatibility issues with a TE110P card installed on a Dell Poweredge 1950? I noted the following error on the LCD display of the Dell Poweredge 1950: E1711 PCI PErr Slot 1 E171F PCIE Fatal Error B0 D4 F0. The Dell hardware owners manual states that it means the system BIOS has reported a PCI parity error on a component that resides in PCI configuration space at bus 0,

I am running irqbalance with default configuration on an Atom 330 machine. This CPU has 2 physical cores + 2 SMT (aka Hyperthreading) cores. As shown below the interrupt for the eth0 device is always on CPUs 0 and 1, with CPUs 2 and 3 left idle. But why? Maybe irqbalance prefers physical cores? My understanding, though, is that the even-numbered CPUs are the physical cores, with the

Hi All, If I turn off irqbalance xen/arch/x86/irq.c, does that actually stop XEN from balancing irqs across different physical cpus, or will that override the setting if there are too many interrupts and one of the cpus is overloaded. Example: i have 4 cpus and i have configured irqbalance= off, so there is no irqbalancing done by xen. Now if i have affintized all my physical interrutps to one

hi folks. recently some of our customers complained about bad voice quality on the phone system. i looked at the logs and found a lot of these: [2012-11-03 08:26:38] NOTICE[11305] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on D-channel of span 1 [2012-11-03 08:26:45] NOTICE[11305] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on D-channel of span 1 [2012-11-03 08:26:54] NOTICE[11305]

Hello, Here is the situation. There is a machine with 3 intel gigabit card, 2 of them on PCI-X and in bridge, the 3rd is used only for management access. The machine is a dual Xeon 2.8GHz with HT. With 2.6.8 kernel from debian (testing) and htb with u32 on, i usually get about 30-40% software interrupts on CPU0 and CPU2, and without htb and u32, 10% less. Now, if I boot with 2.6.17.9 kernel,

Hello I've got small PBX (30 simultaneous connections) based on asterisk (1.6.2.6), which uses Stargate 2N ISDN to GSM gate. It runs ok for day or two, but then I get: dahdi: HDLC Receiver overrun on channel TE4/0/1/16 (master=TE4/0/1/16) in my kernel logs, in asterisk i get: pri show spans PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 3/0: Provisioned, In Alarm, Down, Active (span 3

Hi All, I am using the script below to limit download rates and manage traffic for a certain IP address and testing the results using iperf. The rate that iperf reports is much higher than the rate I have configured for the HTB qdisc. It''s probably just some newbie trap that''s messing things up but I''m buggered if I can see it. The following script is run on the

Anyone else seen this eth-device and what brings it up? [root at oh1mrr etc]# ifconfig __tmp1192348344 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:AB:DD:2E:D1 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2094689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1645734 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX

" Message from syslogd at localhost at Aug 27 08:57:53 ... kernel:Disabling IRQ #17" is the message I got on all my terminal windows at the time indicated. What is it complaining about? What should I do about it? I got some information from dmesg. It mentions IRQ 17, but the only error is from before the most recent hibernation. Here are some excerpts, in order from dmesg: SELinux:

I have a pretty large setup on one of my customers. Digium TE420B (with echo cancelling module), 3 Xorcom Astribanks with 32 FXS each and 1 Xorcom Astribank with 16 FXO. These FXO ports are NOT used for fax/data transmission, as they are connected to cell phones. Not really related to the issue, but there are also 250 SIP phones. The problem is that fax and dial-up connections are really

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112070 Bug ID: 112070 Summary: H/W Acceleration sufficiently buggy on Debian to hard lock machine GeForce 7600 GO Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: not

I try do implement tests for my puppet code and was playing with rspec-puppet but the following code gives me errors require ''spec_helper'' describe ''irqbalance'' do it { should include_class(''irqbalance'') } it { should include_class(''irqbalance::data'') } it { should

Hi all, I add a blkback QoS patch. You can config(dynamic/static) different I/O speed for different VM disk by this patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -urNp blkback/blkback.c blkback-qos/blkback.c --- blkback/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:54:19.000000000 +0800 +++ blkback-qos/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:53:18.000000000 +0800 @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@

Hi all, I add a blkback QoS patch. You can config(dynamic/static) different I/O speed for different VM disk by this patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -urNp blkback/blkback.c blkback-qos/blkback.c --- blkback/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:54:19.000000000 +0800 +++ blkback-qos/blkback.c 2011-06-22 07:53:18.000000000 +0800 @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@

After updating to centos 4.3, I notice a failure in terminating irqbalance whenever i shutdown the system. Checking the services after the system reboot i see the error in irqbalance: "irqbalance dead but subsys locked" Can anyone tell me what irqbalance is and if it safe to disable it ? Why i dont see it in centos 4.2? Thanks in advance. Thai

This patch series introduces the shared ring used by the front-end to pass request descriptors to tapdisk, as well as responses from tapdisk to the front-end. Requests from this ring end up in tapdisk''s standard request queue. When the tapback daemon detects that the front-end tries to connect to the back-end, it spawns a tapdisk and tells it to connect to the shared ring. The shared