similar to: VNC console only shows black screen on HVM guest running on Xen 4.1 with Ubuntu 12.04 as Dom0

Hi Everyone I have sorted out the initial issues I''ve had and decided to give Xen another go. I''m trying to run Xen using kernel 2.6.37-rc3 (previous attempt with rc1 failed, and when I gave it a second go, rc3 was already out). As previously, 2.6.37-rc3 boots fine natively. 2.6.32 boots natively and under Xen as dom0, but I have reservations against running 2.6.32,

Hi Everyone I have sorted out the initial issues I''ve had and decided to give Xen another go. I''m trying to run Xen using kernel 2.6.37-rc3 (previous attempt with rc1 failed, and when I gave it a second go, rc3 was already out). As previously, 2.6.37-rc3 boots fine natively. 2.6.32 boots natively and under Xen as dom0, but I have reservations against running 2.6.32,

Greetings, I''m attempting to do gfx_passthru with the primary graphics adapter (03:00.0), passing it to a guest. I can unbind it from the host but when I fire up the guest OS my monitor loses signal from the graphics card and that''s that. The GFX card is dual DVI, I''ve tried both slots. Host is Linux 2.6.32.14-1.2.105.xendom0.fc12.x86_64, Guest is Windows 7. PC is an

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64 Version: 3.4.2-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -- Dump: (XEN) Xen version 3.4 (Debian 3.4.2-29 (XEN) Command line: com1=115200,8n1 console=com1,vga loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all noreboot (XEN) Video information: (XEN) VGA is text mode 80x25, font 8x16 (XEN) VBE/DDC methods: none; EDID transfer time: 1 seconds (XEN) EDID info not

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64 Version: 3.4.2-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -- Dump: (XEN) Xen version 3.4 (Debian 3.4.2-29 (XEN) Command line: com1=115200,8n1 console=com1,vga loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all noreboot (XEN) Video information: (XEN) VGA is text mode 80x25, font 8x16

When booting a recently compiled Xen 4.2 on Ubuntu 12.04, dom0 crashes. I''ve included a serial console log below. I''ve used: Xen 4.2 unstable rev. 25483, compiled on the same machine. I had to apply the AT_EMPTY_PATH patch from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-02/msg03460.html to get it to compile. Linux 3.2.0-25, which is the default kernel in Ubuntu''s

Hi, I have a system based on a Supermicro X8DTH-i motherboard and a Xeon E5506 CPU. It was previously running Debian lenny with xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 (3.2.1-2) / linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (2.6.26-29) without incident. I upgraded it to Debian squeeze, with xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 (4.0.1-4) / linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (2.6.32-45) and now it does not complete a boot of the dom0

Hi, I'm geting this message from virt-manager. Server: SuperMicro X8SIL with INTEL X3440 Here is my logs /var/log/dmesg: Bootdata ok (command line is ro root=/dev/md2) Linux version 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen (mockbuild at builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:49:53 EDT 2010 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Xen: 0000000000000000 -

I''ve got a new system with Dual Quad Core Intel E5520 processors and Intel 82576 NICs built on the motherboard (this is a Supermicro Nehalem based blade). I''m running Xen 3.4.2, but I''ve also tried 3.4.1 and had the same problem. Dom0''s network works flawlessly, but the DomU systems all have network issues. Whenever they transmit large packets, it is as if

Hi folks, currently I try to setup a new xen host v3.4.1 on top of a Asus P5E-VM DO (latest BIOS, Vt-d capable and enabled in BIOS) to migrate my extisting HVMs (Win2k3 server) running on Xen v3.3.0 to a new home. I want to switch over to 3.4.1 to (hopefully!) passthrough my ISDN board to a HVM domU. Unfortunate there seem some issue with the VT-d DMAR tables which is beyond my knowledge and

Hi, An APIC error continues happening. __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ \/ /___ _ __ | || | / | _ _ _ __ ___| |_ __ _| |__ | | ___ \ // _ \ ''_ \ | || |_ | |__| | | | ''_ \/ __| __/ _` | ''_ \| |/ _ \ / \ __/ | | | |__ _|| |__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | | __/ /_/\_\___|_| |_| |_|(_)_| \__,_|_|

Hi guys, I'm looking at the possibility of running a pair of servers with Dovecot LDA/imap/pop3 using internal drives with DRBD and GFS (or other clustered FS) for the mail storage and ext3 for the root drive. I'm currently using maildrop for delivery and Dovecot imap/pop3 with the stores over NFS. I'm looking for better performance but still keeping the HA element I have now with

The Python language recently migrated from SVN to Mercurial as their version control system. As part of this effort, a detailed migration plan was written: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/ Now, I'm not proposing that we favor using Mercurial over Git*. But I would suggest that perhaps you could use the Python migration plan as a template for LLVM's migration. (*I use both

On Aug 19, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Talin wrote: > The Python language recently migrated from SVN to Mercurial as their version control system. As part of this effort, a detailed migration plan was written: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/ Hi guys, Just to be absolutely clear here, Mercurial is not being considered. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi All, I am creating an instrumentation pass using LLVM libraries. I am using clang++ (version 2.9) to compile cpp code into LLVM bit code. When I generate the llvm bit code using clang++ using -O3, I get many instances of instructions that look like the following. br i1 icmp ne (i8* bitcast (i32 (i32)* @pthread_cancel to i8*), i8* null), label %bb23, label %bb25 Here three LLVM instructions

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

Hi, guys. I'm a newbie to LLVM and have a very simple question. Which instructions should I use (in terms of IRBuilder calls) to allocate an array of bytes in stack (alloca?), then to work with it (from a given offset) as with integer (bitcast?). I mean something like that: unsigned char var[8]; unsigned int offset = 3; int val = *(int*)(&var+offset); /* read */ *(int*)(&var+offset)

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as