similar to: Cpu Utilisation

On some production servers with dom0 kernel 2.6.32 pvops and xen 4.0 and domus mainly windows with gplpv I noticed a strange cpu usage by the dom0 mainly with the use of a single cpu, for example this take from one server: xm vcpu-list Name ID VCPU CPU State Time(s) CPU Affinity ... Domain-0 0 0 3 -b- 1043377.5 any cpu

Hi anyone know if they have a big bug to winbindd ? : After 5 mn of utilisation, winbindd use 100% of cpu resource : PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17096 root 25 0 10700 3556 9432 R 99.3 0.7 1:03.02 winbindd and we have into the log: [2005/12/05 16:29:06, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(817) winbindd:

At 02:54 PM 3/22/02 +0200, you wrote: >I only have a 4% cpu utilisation decrease when setting quality to 1 >(0.1) against setting quality to 9. >Is this normal ? Yes. >Also I don't see any CPU % decrease when lowering bitrates (on managed >modes) >The only things that realy reduce the cpu usage is sample rate and >number of channels. That's correct. Vorbis

I only have a 4% cpu utilisation decrease when setting quality to 1 (0.1) against setting quality to 9. Is this normal ? Also I don't see any CPU % decrease when lowering bitrates (on managed modes) The only things that realy reduce the cpu usage is sample rate and number of channels. I am a little used with lame which with a quality setting of 9 (aka 0.1 in vorbis_enc) greatly reduce

Hullo Everybody ; I am failing to start my new VM and it tells me unkown bootloader . Below are my parameters and output . Could somebody be having an idea of putting right this problem? [root@virtualintranet /]# xe vm-param-list uuid=70645ba3-bcbc-683b-099e-ed197301fcc2 uuid ( RO) : 70645ba3-bcbc-683b-099e-ed197301fcc2 name-label ( RW): PVG1

Hi all, i still have problem.. Some time I am able to install and other not. I tried this on different machine either in a pool and either in a single installation of XCP. These are the steps I use to create a VM: # set disk size xe template-param-set uuid=9d8c3be5-f16b-7446-b978-e23551d8a77e other-config:disks="<provision><disk device=\"0\"

Dovecot (0.9.11) consumes 100% CPU utilisation when accessing (either pop or imap) one of my mailboxes. It doesn''t happen with other mailboxes. The mailbox has about 500 mails while others have many more. They are all in mbox format. OS: OpenBSD-3.5 with all patches MTA: Sendmail-8.12.11 It happened with other RCs of dovecot-0.9.11 Configured as: ./configure --without-pam

I have a small handheld pc having ARM process as a CPU. I installed debian and installed R using apt-get command. Everything worked great except for drawing even simple graphs x <- 1:10 plot(x) I got error messages 1: Nonfinite axis limits [GScale(nan,nan,1, .); log=0] 2: relative range of values = 9.0072e+15 * EPS, is small (axis 1). 3: Nonfinite axis limits

I post this message on R-help mailing list but someone emailed me that I can get helped if I post this one on R-devel mailing list. I have a small handheld pc having ARM process as a CPU. I installed debian and installed R (R-1.7.0 base and core, help html, latex-help) using apt-get command. Everything worked great except for drawing even simple graphs x <- 1:10 plot(x) I got error

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-13 Severity: critical I get this bug when installing XCP and configuring the network portion of it. When I issue the following command: xe pif-reconfigure-ip uuid=$PIF_UUID mode=static IP=10.0.0.10 netmask=255.255.255.240 gateway=10.0.0.1 DNS=10.5.1.2,10.5.1.3 My network interface looks like this (Broken): eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:ec:24:c7:43

Hi, I''ve been touring XCP and making my way around it for the last few days, and am having problems with some reasonably straightforward actions. I''ve poured a several hours into different ways of resolving the issue, but am coming up short. Here''s the main issue. The following command (plugging in a VBD to the dom0 VM), when, run, hangs for several minutes, and then

Dear All, I am in the somewhat unfortunate position of having to reproduce the results previously obtained from (non-metric?) MDS on a "kinship" matrix using Statistica. A kinship matrix measures affinity between groups, and has its maximum values on the diagonal. Apparently, starting with a nxn kinship matrix, all it was needed to do was to feed it to Statistica flagging that the

Hi I'm trying to upgrade from Samba 3.0.23c on FC4 to 3.0.25b from Samba sources. Everything appears to function correctly until an MS word document is opened from a share - the file opens but the smbd process in question rockets to 99%+ CPU, stays there & needs kill -9'ing to stop it. This happens reliably. I have an appropriate strace & a level 7 log but can't see anything

Hi, can any body suggest any tool which can show the utilisation for individual classes for HTB. preferable written in C/or shell script. Regards Jayesh ------------------------------------------------- Still single? Click here to find the perfect match. http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?141

Hi dear sirs, I am wondering why the fit of the time serie x with an arima and the fit of diff(x) with an arma (same coeff p & d) differ one from another here are the output of R: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > modelarma<-arma(diff(x),c(7,5)) > modelarma Call: arma(x = diff(x), order = c(7, 5)) Coefficient(s): ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ma1 ma2 0.06078

Hello, I have installed XCP in Debian following the steps depicted in http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XCP_toolstack_on_a_Debian-based_distribution . Out of the box, dom0 takes hold of all the available memory, so I cannot start any domU (I''m using XenCenter). If I try to limit the dom0 memory using kernel parameter dom0_mem, it is apparently ignored. Info: # cat /proc/cmdline placeholder

1) If I see the Loadavg more than 4 , whats the immediate solution to get it under 1 APART from restarting the server ? 2) I get too much of cross connections. Can Codec be the culprit ? I use g729. Can using GSM will solve the problem ? What could be the other reasons ? 3) Anyway to measure the bandwidth utilisation from the server ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hello, Is it possible to alter how XCP enumerates multi-core cpu’s such that a Vcpu represents a “socket”, rather than a “core”? A server with dual quad core processors, no HT, presents each of the 8 cores as a Vcpu to the guest. Windows Server 2008 R2 see’s each Vcpu as a unique “socket” and we are therefore coming up against licensing issues with Windows and more importantly SQL Server 2008

Title: HOWTO-FreeBSD-on-XCP Author: John D. "Trix" Farrar Date: 2012-02-09 * The Challenge - ParaVirtualized FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE under XCP 1.1.0 The idea here is to create a PV FreeBSD VM under Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) without starting with an HVM first. The documentation I''''ve been able to find on-line is at least a year old and is mostly written for Xen (under

On 11/12/2015 08:02 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? I've also tried 20us. And results shows 50us was better in: - very small packet tx (e.g 64bytes at most 46% improvement) - TCP_RR (at most 11% improvement) But I will test bigger values. In fact, for net itself, we can be