similar to: Cluster xen

Hi, I want to combine all the above mentioned technologies. The Linbit pages warn not to use the drbd: VBD with HVM DomUs. This page however: http://publications.jbfavre.org/virtualisation/cluster-xen-corosync-pacemaker-drbd-ocfs2.en (thank you Jean), simply puts two DRBD devices in dual primary mode and starts Xen DomUs while pointing to the DRBD devices with phy: in the DomU config files.

Hi all, could somebody point me to what is considered a sound way to offer Xen guests on a two node DRBD cluster in combination with Pacemaker? I prefer block devices over images for the DomU''s. I understand that for live migration DRBD 8.3 is needed, but I''m not sure as to what kind of resource agents/technologies are advised (LVM,cLVM, ...) and what kind of DRBD config

Greetings - Hoping to hear from hunner or one of the other maintainers of the puppetlabs corosync module - there is a note on the git project page that there is currently no way to configure STONITH. Is this information current? If so, has anybody come up with a simple method of managing STONITH with corosync via puppet? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hello all, I am trying to create a corosync/pacemaker cluster using CentOS 6.0. However, I'm having a great deal of difficulty doing so. Corosync has a valid configuration file and an authkey has been generated. When I run /etc/init.d/corosync I see that only corosync is started. >From experience working with corosync/pacemaker before, I know that this is not enough to have a functioning

Hi, I''m new in Xensource World. I have to work on Xen 3.1.2 hypervisor, I''ve done some searches on how to make Xen HA (not FT for the moment).The way that is come again and again is to make a cluster with Corosync, pacemaker, DRDB. I just want to now if there are others way to do Xen HA, and which is the best way in your opinion?I need something very stable and sustainable.

On 22/06/16 01:01 AM, Tom Robinson wrote: > Hi, > > I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High Availability servers, > automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down. > > My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've found appears to not > do this. Am I missing something? Very possible. It's

Hi, I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High Availability servers, automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down. My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've found appears to not do this. Am I missing something? My configuration so fare includes: * SAN Storage Volumes for raw device mappings for guest vms

Bonjour, Est ce qu''une ressource parmi vous a déjà effectuer une migration de machine virtuelle de XEN vers XENSERVER? J''aimerai changer de serveur en migrant toutes mes VM du serveur xen vers le serveur xenserveur. Est ce que des personnes ont déjà effectuer ce genre de migration? Si oui comment avez vous procéder? D''avance merci pour vos nombreaux retour. Cdlt.

Hi all, In threads posted by I believe Jonathan Tripley I promised to post my new XEN HA setup. Hope it can be of some use to some people. In this particular case I''m forced to use SLES 10SP3 with XEN 3.2, which excludes the possibility of using things like cLVM (which I don''t think I need anyway). So: Storage: I use two HP ML370 G5 machines with DRBD and heartbeat on

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: > Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence > (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start > floating IP. My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

Hi, I think this would be the best forum, let me know if not. I am in the middle of writing fencing scripts for Citrix XenServer virtual machines (specifically for use with Redhat Clustering, but will also work from pacemaker etc) and I noticed that XCP uses the same XenAPI (from what I can tell). Just wondering if someone would be able to test the scripts on XCP and let me know if they work.

Hi, We''re setting up fairly large Lustre 2.1.2 filesystems, each with 18 nodes and 159 resources all in one Corosync/Pacemaker cluster as suggested by our vendor. We''re getting mixed messages on how large of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster will work well between our vendor an others. 1. Are there Lustre Corosync/Pacemaker clusters out there of this size or larger? 2.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package, though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it. I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster: [root at clnode1 ~]# rpm -q pacemaker pacemaker-1.1.13-10.el7_2.4.x86_64 The installation is up-to-date on both nodes as of the

hi everybody, would you know if 8 version is going to have HA solutions from clusterlabs.org available, just like Centos7 has? (from Centos' own repos/streams) many thanks, L.

Dear Experts, I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay away from it finally, and ask clever people what they would use. My requirements are: 1. I would like to have one big (say, comparable to petabyte)

Hi Guys, I overhauled and simplified the Pacemaker hooks recently. This patch: - Reuses more code from the Pacemaker libraries - Escalates fencing to the cluster manager instead of initiating it directly Attached patch is against master, or you can pull the original patch which is against an older version used by SUSE:

Roger, Thanks for your reply. As I understand it, for reliable fencing a node cannot be responsible for fencing itself, as it may not be functioning properly. Hence my "cross over" setup. The direct USB connection from Webserver1 to UPS-Webserver2 means that Webserver1 can fence (cut the power to) Webserver2 if the cluster software decides that it is necessary. If my UPSes were able to

Hello , Centos users: My name is Leandro, I have been using Centos for 4 years and this is the first post in this mail list. I would like to study and introduce myself in clustering and high availability for Centos, currently I have not experience at all about it. I would like to ask about the newest method to achieve high availability , load balancing on linux / Centos. So far I have seen the

Hi all, We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would like to set up something where I can easily have more than one redundant server, security/authentication (this part seems a little flaky with NFS, at least did several years ago), with the capability to easily add/remove servers as necessary, take redundant servers down for maintenance, etc. Total volume we expect to run

Hello List, Any suggestions to solve the following would be most appreciated. Setup: Active/Passive Two Node Cluster. Two UPSes (APC Smart-UPS 1500 C) with USB communication cables cross connected (ie UPS-webserver1 monitored by webserver2, and vice versa) to allow for stonith/fencing OS OpenSuse Leap 42.2 NUT version 2.7.1-2.41-x86_64 Fencing agent: external/nut Problem: When power fails to a