similar to: how to call a class from different module than current

Hi all, I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of activity is roughly like this: 1) Create moduleA 2) Create moduleB with "func()" 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); 4) execute "func()" (this works fine)

Michael Muller wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module > (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of > activity is roughly like this: > > 1) Create moduleA > 2) Create moduleB with "func()" > 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( > new

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Michael Muller <mmuller at enduden.com> wrote: > > Michael Muller wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module >> (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out.  My sequence of >> activity is roughly like this: >> >>   1) Create

On 3 February 2010 14:13, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use > ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the > foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will > probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in >

Hey all, A quick question about the LLVM C-Api and using LinkModules. In a normal situation where I have 2 LLVM modules and 1 depends on the other using LLVMLinkModules2() works perfectly. LLVMLinkModules2() "Links the source module into the destination module. The source module is destroyed." according to the comment of the function. That is all fine when you only have 2 modules. But

Hi James, > This is interesting. I've just implemented dynamic loading of bitcode modules into lli for my project. I did this by hacking lli using the Linker class. Is ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping() preferred for this purpose? I'm not sure about the preferred way, but at least for the JIT, here is an email from Jeffrey concerning a previous thread. The issue in that thread was

Hey Lang, Thank you for your help and your patience – also for your answers in the “ORC JIT - Can modules independently managed with one LLJIT instance? + problems with ExecutionSession.lookup” mail. Both problems have the same origin so I keep writing about it here, to avoid duplication. My big problem is still handling cross references between modules with “our” name scheme. Since our old

Hey everyone, I felt this question is different from my other question - hope this is okay. So - I was playing around with the lookup function of the ExecutionSession and there are some things I don't understand. I have a .BC file with a function "?Sampler@@YAXXZ" referencing a value "?_Plansch_test@@3HA" that is not defined in that module itself. I first planed on not

Hey Lang, > Do you mean that the object file is produced by another process and is being loaded into your JIT process for execution, or that you want your JIT to produce code for several different processes? These are different problems with different solutions. I'll wait until I understand your use case to answer further. In the current state we don’t have a JIT only an handcrafted object

Hey Lang, Woah! That mail contains a lot of information and things I never tried yet… Actually… the entire MaterializationUnit and MaterializationResponsibility part is… quite… overwhelming >O< With “pop up” I mean… the process which is waiting for Module “Planschi” to “pop up” can not do a thing about it. It just waits until there is an table entry for it, indicating that the object file

Hi, I just put together a little mixin to provide pseudo-RESTful services in camping apps. Basically, it looks for a hidden _verb field in form posts, and sets the @method to the supplied value (e.g. put or delete - which browsers don''t support). This lets you define put and delete methods in your controllers. Groovy. Code: http://pastie.caboo.se/22613 Is there any permanent repo of

Hi group, im updating some modules of puppet, and i found this issue or error, that i cannot get resolved it. My puppetmaster is 2.7.1 and client 2.7.18. I used other modulo to prover apt configurations but i think this is more completed. I know that the error is something missing or my class is not present or something like that, the dependencies of the modulo are installed, stdlib and i

Dear puppet wizards, http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/3/reference/lang_defined_types.html does not suggest to me that nested parametrized defines would be forbidden, hence I expected the following code to work: add_to_ssh_authorized_keys.pp: -------- define a::ssh_keys::add_to_ssh_authorized_keys($homebasedir="/home", $targetuser="root", $keyowner, $keyownername,

Hello, when I run on my proxy server: # puppet device --debug --deviceconf /etc/puppet/device/F5-lb-test.conf I get this error: info: starting applying configuration to F5-lb-test at https://operating:operating4lbtest@F5-lb-test/Common debug: Puppet::Device::F5: connecting to F5 device F5-lb-test. debug: Puppet::Device::F5: connecting to partition Common. *err: Can''t load f5 for

Hi all, I have three parameterized classes, named mq, mq_gsk and apache. The mq class always calls the mq_gsk class, but the apache class should only call the mq_gsk class when the mq class is not used in a hosts'' node definition Here is my configuration class mq ( $gsk_version = undef ) { require mq::params < ..... > class { ''mq_gsk'':

Hello everyone, everytime I run on a puppet host: #puppet agent --test I see this commet: info: Applying configuration version ''000001'' then lets say I deploy a new package from my local repository, from which I would get a different configuration version. #puppet agent --test info: Applying configuration version ''000002'' ...question: is there a way to

mkinitrd relies on /sys/class/scsi_host/*/proc_name instead of /sys/block/sd*/device/../../../moalias to get the scsi driver module name. As a fallback the sysfs driver name could be used, which does not match the module name either ('storvsc' vs. 'hv_storvsc'). Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf at aepfle.de> --- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed,

mkinitrd relies on /sys/class/scsi_host/*/proc_name instead of /sys/block/sd*/device/../../../moalias to get the scsi driver module name. As a fallback the sysfs driver name could be used, which does not match the module name either ('storvsc' vs. 'hv_storvsc'). Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf at aepfle.de> --- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed,

Hi all, This is Michael and very happy to share my question here! My question is, is there a way to "extract" a function from Module A and write it into another Module B, and generate two new IR files? IRBuilder seems like a workable way but I have to create instructions one by one. I am new to LLVM so don't know whether it is doable, here is my experimental code:

This is in reference to David Schmitt''s writeup [1] I like that writeup a lot; I just had a few comments/clarifications: * Namespaces: For now, we just use a flat namespace for modules, i.e. you can''t have modules within modules, and you always know that in a fully qualified name ''foo::bar::baz'' that ''foo'' is the module name and