similar to: agent to fileserver retry

Hi all, I've 4 servers with dovecot and ldap authentication behind a loadbalancer (Alteon). To connect to dovecot, client need to use a vip of the loadbalancer. To connect to the ldap server, dovecot need to use the loadbalancer cause there are several ldap server. The loadbalancer close a connection without activity during 30mn Dovecot lauch several authentication process who have

Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really

And lsof the agent too - see what files it has open... Nico -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Steves [mailto:kevin at atomicgears.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:48 PM > To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Cc: stevesk at pobox.com > Subject: Re: 3.4p1 ssh-agent auth-retry patch available: was: Re: > Updated ssh-agent authentication retry patch available

I wrote a patch to make the number of times and and the delay between retries that ssh attempts to talk to ssh-agent configurable. This patch is indispensible when running multiple ssh sessions in parallel from a script (e.g. to run commands on a large number of hosts); without the patch, many ssh sessions simply fail because they cannot contact the agent, rendering the mechanism unusable. If

This patch against OpenSSH 3.2.3p1 implements an ssh-agent authentication retry mechanism which is useful when starting many ssh clients in a short period of time. The number of retries and the maximum delay between retries is runtime-configurable using AuthMaxRetries <integer> AuthRetryDelay <seconds> The patch is available at:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736 Bug ID: 1736 Summary: nftables - dynamic update for verdict map from the packet path Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

is anybody using hiera with puppet-3 and per-module hierarchy? it seems calling_module/calling_class is entirely broken now. see: http://pastebin.com/CfbW5Kcu and #16730 and PR1214 (which only fixes backend_puppet i think). anyone has some unofficial patches? because i''m just stuck in migration :( please don''t advise me to use data bindings as there is no way to use them in

Hi everybody, we're currently in the process of drafting our new mailserver-setup. Instead of a single-server-setup we'd like to have two equal servers behind a loadbalancer like LVS and shared mailhomes on NFS. We'd like to use dovecot for POP/IMAP, dovecot-deliver as LDA. - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to the same server behind the

We like to set up our mail system in two datacenters but the wiki<https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication> says "Shared folder replication doesn't work correctly..." I'm thinking about using an external loadbalancer to ensure that only one host will get connections. Normal operations: client ==imap=> loadbalancer ==imap=> host1 ==replication=> host2 Host1 or

> I have 2 test servers with the below configuration. > > ========================== > Linux OS - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > Dovecot version - 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > Postfix version - 2.10.1 > ========================== > > Trying to create High Availability. > > I have added both of the above servers behind a F5 load

Hi! I'm using dovecot for a while now and really like it. Actually dovecot 1.5 on Debian AMD64. Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be quite slow, though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put INDEX and CONTROL files on the local disc and so outside of the maildirs. Performance is great but the problem is with submissions to

Hi! I''ve been using Mongrel in a Rails setup with HAProxy as a loadbalancer. I used to use Pound, but HAProxy is much more performant and has the very nice option to limit the amount of requests sent to the backend servers/processes. In practice, this means that a new incoming request will not be sent to a Mongrel that''s already busy processing a request. There''s

Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:50:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > you should avoid this > one solution is to use loadbalancers with persistance We had been using a loadbalancer with persistence to reduce the problems, and today I switched to everything running on a single box to avoid any cross-node contention. Unfortunately, the problem still happens, even when they were all running

Thank you for the reply. I have done the sync manually with "doveadm sync" command. But, I have not configured the replication yet. I am looking at the below webpage for the replication. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication I am using the dovecot version "2.2.36". I am confused with what needs to be done after reading that page. 1. They are talking about v2.3.1 and v2.2+.

Hi, I have question i have loadbalancer that's connects every x seconds to my pop3 and Imap to see if it's still working. Every time it connects I see its ip is there a way to say don't log ip x.x.x.x ? With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

2014-02-16 8:31 GMT+01:00 <alf at i100.no>: > Hi > Hi Alf, > One idea I've had for some time, but unfortunately not had time to > implement, is to add a general SNMP agent, which will work with all UPSes > supported by nut. > The idea is to have the SNMP agent use the "nut API" to fetch values from > the UPS. > So the SNMP agent will be similar to

Hi Friends I am facing an issue with dovecot configuration and i am describing it in a nutshell. We have a dovecot setup under ultramonkey load balancer and in loadbalancer we have a check defined for pop service which queries mysqldatabase for a particular user name/password after every 2 minutes to check if service is live or not.. Things are fine till here . Now The catch is if somehow that

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >