similar to: Announcing stdlib 3.0.0

Facter 2.0.0rc1 is a feature release candidate with bug fixes, features and other improvements. Facter 2.0 is designed to accompany the upcoming Puppet 3.0 release and has breaking changes from Facter 1.6.x. Facter 2.0 is not backwards compatible with Puppet 2.6 or 2.7. It includes contributions from the following people: Chris Price, Daniel Black, Daniel Pittman, Garrett Honeycutt, Gary Larizza,

Puppet 3.2.1-rc1 is a bugfix release candidate for the 3.x series of Puppet. This release addresses two major issues that were uncovered in 3.2.0 and caused us to pull that release (#20726 and #20742). It also includes a fix for Solaris support (#19760). Downloads are available at: * Source https://downloads.puppetlabs.com/puppet/puppet-3.2.1-rc1.tar.gz Available in native package format in

puppetlabs_spec_helper is a Rubygem to make writing and running module spec tests using rspec-puppet easier. It includes a set of common rake tasks and a spec_helper that correctly initializes puppet and rspec-puppet for testing. The code is available on github at http://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper. Patches are welcome. To convert a module with existing spec tests to use the

I am using puppet 2.7.14 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. I have the following gems: *** LOCAL GEMS *** diff-lcs (1.1.3) hiera (0.3.0) hiera-puppet (0.3.0) metaclass (0.0.1) mocha (0.12.1) puppet-lint (0.1.13) puppetlabs_spec_helper (0.2.0) rake (0.9.2.2) rspec (2.11.0) rspec-core (2.11.1) rspec-expectations (2.11.2) rspec-mocks (2.11.1) rspec-puppet (0.1.3) When I run "rake help" I get the

Hey Gang, Running into a weird error when trying to follow puppetlabs'' blog: https://puppetlabs.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-puppet-module-testing/ I''m running 10.8.2, using default ruby, in an attempt to make my home env a little more sane, (ran into weird rbenv issues at work, which I won''t go into here) The google tells me not a whole lot. Appreciate any help

I''ve been working on getting spec tests on all of my modules and am down to ones that use hiera and don''t have any reasonable defaults. It looks like there is a project on GH (https://github.com/amfranz/rspec-hiera-puppet) that is designed to fill this need, but for the life of me I cannot make it work. FriedBob helped out on the IRC channel some with his solution of including

puppetlabs_spec_helper is a Rubygem to make writing and running module spec tests using rspec-puppet easier. It includes a set of common rake tasks and a spec_helper that correctly initializes puppet and rspec-puppet for testing. Changes: * Rake should fail if git can''t clone repository * add backwards-compatible support for arbitrary git refs in .fixtures.yml * Only remove the

I''m trying to make puppetlabs_spec_helper runs on Windows 7 to test my Puppet modules. Is this supported ? Because I encountered some problems: 1. symlinks were not created on Windows 7 (even if the functionnality are availabe). To manage that I added to rake_tasks.rb an ugly function: def make_link(source,target) ruby_platform =

Does puppet doc require a specific version of any gems (such as rdoc or rake) to operate? I''m getting some errors when I try to generate my rdoc now. # puppet doc --output /var/www/test --modulepath /etc/puppet/environments/test/modules -m rdoc RDoc::RDocError is deprecated and will be removed in RDoc 4 Could not generate documentation: uninitialized constant RDoc::RDoc::Generator

I''m trying to get rspec-puppet working and have run into a problem. I have a VM running ubuntu lucid, have installed rubygems 1.3.5 from the apt package and have install rspec-puppet (and other required gems), and rake, using gem install. I''ve run rspec-puppet-init in the module I want to test, and have created a very basic spec file for one of the classes in my module.

Hey guys, Quick update. I grepped through the output of getsebool -a to see that related to puppet. And I found this setting: puppetagent_manage_all_files. So I tried running this command: setsebool -P puppetagent_manage_all_files 0 And did a restorecon on my modules directory: restorecon -R -v environments/production/moudles So there's good news and bad news to report! It seems that

Hi all, There is something amiss with what I am doing. I believe the following should work. puppetlabs_spec_helper (0.3.0) rspec (2.11.0) rspec-core (2.11.1) rspec-expectations (2.11.2) rspec-mocks (2.11.1) rspec-puppet (0.1.4) . ├── manifests │   └── init.pp ├── Rakefile └── spec ├── classes │   └── testthis_spec.rb ├── defines ├── fixtures │   ├── manifests │   │   └──

I''m in the process of trying to get automated testing for my modules, using puppet-lint, rspec-puppet, puppetlabs_spec_helper and Jenkins. Are there any automated, or semi-automated ways to ensure coverage on my tests? At the moment I am writing tests for existing modules, but I also need to be able to be relatively certain that tests are updated as modules are, and minimize reliance

I have no idea of the current dependency problem. I think your original problem was caused by mv'ing files from an nfs share to /etc which maintained the context. And SELinux prevented puppet from accessing nfs_t type. If you had just run restorecon on the object it would have set it back to the correct/default context. You might want to setup an alias mv "mv -Z" This changes

So if I first create the value in an entry BB and then build a CopyToReg but then I have to read it in a BB that loops back to itself, with it's own CopyToReg at the end, then I have two CopyToReg nodes for the same value. In this case, I need to create 3 virt regs, 1 for each CopyToReg and a third for the CopyFromReg in the beginning of the loop BB, right? And then I need to build a PHI

So if I create a value with a DAG.getUndef(myVT); call during instruction legalization, how can I access that value as input in another BB/DAG (also during instruction legalization) without worrying about live-ins and/or phi nodes? Can I create a single virtual register and build both a CopyToReg and a CopyFromReg node with it? I assumed that would break SSA. Perhaps I should have said that what

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" >Matthias,</div> <div dir="ltr" > </div> <div dir="ltr" >Thanks for the response.</div> <div

I'm having trouble with the standard deviation distribution as shown on http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StandardDeviationDistribution.html . (Eric Weisstein references Kenney and Keeping 1951, which I can't check.) I believe the graphs they show, but when I code the function in R, according to the listed formula, I get very different graphs. Would someone please point out my error or tell

Hi, I was playing with rspec and every time I find a possible improvement that could be made in spec_helper or rakefile I have to change it in every module that is using rspec tests. So maybe these things could be centralized, I thought to myself. I found the following module, actually. https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-module_spec_helper But I am at a lost how to use it. Is it supposed

Hello, I''m writing my first puppet function rspec test and am having a problem which I don''t see how to solve. The function (and the test) involve access to files through the File Server. In order for the function (and the test) to work I need to pass "--fileserverconf=fileserver.conf" parameter to Puppet. So far I haven''t found a way to do that. If I