similar to: define function problem

Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! /etc/pam.d/common-session session required pam_limits.so /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max = 100000

> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not? Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the symbolizer, it goes away. > Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then > exec the specified binary > %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How

Hi I update os from debian8 to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master:

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit from init, which is pretty low: 1024. We've set

Hello, On a production system, I'm seeing this: [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14742] res_agi.c: Unable to create toast pipe: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] rtp.c: Unable to allocate RTCP socket: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732]

> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the > process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that. We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS. The former is lighter weight and easy to configure. The downside is that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if, for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer. While

On 31 Jan 2015, at 01:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Hi testers, > > 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. > > The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please > file issues against it. > > Thanks for helping with the release! This time I got an error during check-all, on i386-unknown-freebsd10:

I hope that someone has had a similar trouble and will be able to help us : We , have installed the R package in a Digital Workstation with 500Mb of RAM memory, running under Unix operating system. The package works fine but when we try to start the program with more than 120Mb, (vsize - --120M) the workstation refuses to allocate this memory. The message that we get is: Fatal error:

Hi, perhaps this? > with new debian9: > open files (-n) 1024 Regards Urban Am 16.09.20 um 12:57 schrieb Maciej Milaszewski: > Hi > Limits: > > Where all working fine: > > core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 > file size?????????????? (blocks,

When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 < 4096), because of default_client_limit # doveconf default_internal_user default_internal_user = dovecot Should dovecot print this warning based on $default_internal_user, or based on root? As root: # ulimit -n 1024 As user dovecot: $ ulimit -n

Hi, CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? $ make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:27:54AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 5, 2019, at 6:57 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > > > no core file (yes, ulimit is configured) yeah, I meant "ulimit -c unlimited" is in effect. I had no idea systemd had made such a drastic change. or is it that someone at RH decided to make it (nearly) impossible

Hi Thomas, > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? > > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not > survive a reboot. > > Thanks for the response, I've been nosing around that file recently but noted the first two lines; #This file sets the

Hello again, I encountered something amazing. First I thought there is not enough memory allowed through ulimit. ulimit is now set to (almost) 512MB but rsync still gets out fo memory at 8MB. Can anyone tell me why? That's my configuration: rsync version 2.6.2 from AIX 5.3 to SuSE Linux 9 (also has rsync 2.6.2) ulimit -a (AIX) ulimit -a AIX (source): -------------------------

[root at abc asterisk]# lsof -u 50771 | wc -l 0 BTW, I'm using CentOS 6.5 > > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:20:19 -0400 >> From: Dovid Bender <dovid at telecurve.com> >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Openfile Issue >> Message-ID:

I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on Centos 5.4 64 bit. How do I do that? Been searching and have yet to find a good answer. Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to happen to late there. Matt

We have CENTOS 4.7 on DELL server. our /etc/security/limits.conf already setup as: * soft nproc 2047 * hard nproc 16384 * soft nofile 4096 * hard nofile 65536 oracle soft nproc 2047 oracle hard nproc 16384 oracle soft nofile 8192

Hi! Question from the novice. I have to permanently increase number of opened files ( ulimit -n 16384 and ulimit -Hn 16384) for some application. I did custom kernel based on https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-custom-kernel-modularized.html and application documentation ( written for RH 9), no error during all makes but I have panic during the

Kimura san, You may ask committer of r153706. I wonder if it could be x86-independent. > /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as

I am having a problem with running utorrent on wine. After running for a little while I eventually get: Error: Too many files open. I have set ulimit -n unlimited which gives me: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM :~# ulimit -n 1048576 root@???: 02:43 AM :~# Also its got plenty of file descriptors so it doesn't seem like wine is truly using up to that amount: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM