similar to: CloudPack problems with CentOS AMIs

I''m still having some issues with cloud provisioner. I have a fresh install of provisioner, .60rc1, puppet 2.7.3, and dashboard 1.2.0. Everything has a very default install as described in the documentation. I was unable to get bootstrap to work, so I did things in a linear fashion (create, install, classify). Classify is failing and theres not really any good debug info, I just get

Hi, I am trying to install fog which is required for cloud provisioner. > gem install fog -v 0.7.2 I am getting the following error Building native extensions. This could take a while... ................ ERROR: Error installing fog: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb creating Makefile make

We are happy to announce the first public release candidate of our Puppet Cloud Provisioner. This release is available for download at our Module Forge: http://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/cloud_provisioner<http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/> Extensive documentation can be found at: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/cloud_pack_getting_started.html Please report feedback via the

I have installed Ruby and Apache, but when tried to install Rails (sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies) I have got an error: INFO: `gem install -y` is now default and will be removed INFO: use --ignore-dependencies to install only the gems you list ERROR: While executing gem ... (URI::InvalidURIError) the scheme http does not accept registry part: :8080 (or bad hostname?)

hi all i''m trying to install ruby on rails on my debian server. i didn''t use apt-get. i installed everything from source. i used this tutorial (without PD-Admin): http://railswiki.de/Ruby_on_Rails_auf_einem_Debian_Server_installieren now i can''t install rails over gem, i''m getting this zlib crc error: root@co2:~# gem install rails --include-dependencies

im trying to install rails with gem. i have compiled 1.8.6 from source and am running gem 1.1.1 here is the output: [root@webapp1 ~]# gem install rails --include-dependencies --verbose --backtrace INFO: `gem install -y` is now default and will be removed INFO: use --ignore-dependencies to install only the gems you list connection reset after 2 requests, retrying Missing metadata for 14022

I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. This series got me to a green checkmark: https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983 but depends on an as-yet uncommitted patch in libvirt-ci:

Hi, I was getting an odd error installing rails-3.0.0.beta3 on a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 install. The same exact error was occurring on my Ubuntu 9.10 install, so I''m sure it isn''t something specific to the Ubuntu version (nor beta for that matter). This is the error: mike@ubuntu:~/rubygems-1.3.6$ sudo gem1.9.1 install rails --pre Successfully installed activesupport-3.0.0.beta3

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2525 Bug ID: 2525 Summary: Please add an alias such as -o Insecure for -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

Trying to get SSH agent forwarding working for a popular open source configuration management system called Ansible. I?ve had some unexpected behaviour, the only cause of which I can find is how I express the command line arguments. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20952689/vagrant-ssh-agent-forwarding-how-is-it-working?noredirect=1#comment31511341_20952689 In summarise: In the first

Perfect, thanks. This winds up working for me (as far as I've tested so far.) Match exec "ping -q -c 1 -t 1 %n | grep '192\.168\.'" StrictHostKeyChecking no UserKnownHostsFile none On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Bostjan Skufca <bostjan at a2o.si> wrote: > (+cc list) > > You could use something in the following manner: > > Match originalhost *

On Sun, 4 Oct 2020, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 14:02 +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > This is strictly no worse than continuing to use the old key, so I > > don't consider it a problem. > > Well but in reality it will lead to people never again replace their > key by proper means. Well, first I disagree that this method is improper. The

If I want to specify for LAN addresses that I don't want to deal with host keys, how do I do that? Understanding the risks, knowing almost everyone will say not to do this - it's a horrible idea, but deciding I want to do it anyway. Tired of having to remove entries from known_hosts with the multiple VM's I have that often change fingerprints, and am willing to live with the risks.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Perfect, thanks. This winds up working for me (as far as I've tested so >> far.) >> >> Match exec "ping -q -c 1 -t 1 %n | grep '192\.168\.'" >>

Hello there, I'm a little afraid of writing here, hope I don't make any mistake doing so. I'm trying for days and searching the web too, but no obvious solution, no reply from the specialized forum I wrote in. Here is the situation: I would like to have a lighter security inside our domain, without changing when going outside. By "lighter security" I mean at least, no

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993 alex at testcore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex at testcore.net Version|5.9p1 |6.2p1 --- Comment #1 from alex at testcore.net --- Also

Hi Brad, I have a few questions regarding ExternalProject_Add. For me it doesn't really work as expected. I add the following code to the tools/clang/runtime/CMakeLists.txt to configure compiler-rt as external project: ExternalProject_Add(compiler-rt #DEPENDS clang clang++ llvm-config PREFIX ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/projects/compiler-rt SOURCE_DIR ${COMPILER_RT_SRC_ROOT}

Brian Candler wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > > ... redundant ones are because I have a mixed population of > > Raspberry Pis and such on my LAN and they get rebuilt fairly > > frequently and thus, each time, get a new entry in known_hosts. > ...many useful tips... > To disable host key checking altogether for certain domains and/or networks, > you can put this in

Hello, I am trying to install RubyGems on Ubuntu and i''m having trouble. I''ve downloaded rubygems 1.3.1 and when i run the sudo ruby setup.rb command I get the problem mentioned below. I''d really appreciate if someone can help me out. Thanks mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8 mkdir -p /usr/bin install -c -m 0644 rbconfig/datadir.rb

As far as I can tell, there currently isn't a straightforward way to use password authentication for connecting to hosts where the host key changes frequently. I realize this is a fairly niche use case, but when developing software for devices that often get reimaged (resulting in a host key change), it can get pretty tedious to attempt to connect, get a warning, remove the old host key via