similar to: Other security holes in cgi program ?

This is probably fairly well known, I found it by accident while reading about the 0xFF command sperator in older version of bash shell. The newer phf cgi that comes with some versions of picasso and rembrant have been patched for the obvious 0x0A newline escape, but can still be escaped using 0xFF. It takes vulnerabilites in both phf and bash for it to work. I have tested this very

[Mod: while not directly related to linux security, this post of course is approved because it provides a good summary and clear description. Please limit the discussion on this topic to new stuff. In general posts like this will be approved -- alex] Automating brute force attacks with ''Expect" balif and desslok - Abstract - phf,

[Mod: This is a misconfiguration of a site. nobody''s uid should not be -1 -- alex] When playing around with rcp on Linux, we found something interesting, that we haven''t seen mentioned on bugtraq before: SUMMARY: Root privileges can be obtained by user nobody with uid 65535 by exploiting a problem with /usr/bin/rcp. Many applications are running as ''nobody'',

I made some matlab codes... Is there any method to perform matlab codes in R program?? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/hi-guestion-tp2311219p2311219.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi All. I'm looking for some help to merge an outstanding Kerberos credential cache change from OpenBSD into Portable. I don't know enough about Kerberos to figure out how that change should be applied for the non-Heimdal(?) code path. The outstanding diff is attached. Any volunteers? -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to LHA for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-178.html refers.

Here's another data point that may be useful. [Scheduling experts, please help! :) ] If the two-byte bitfield is replaced by a two-byte struct (replace "short i:8" with "short i", etc.), the scheduler properly generates a dependency between the store and the load. For this case, a GEP is used instead of a bitcast:

Greetings, I'm investigating a bug in the PowerPC back end in which a load from a storage address is being reordered prior to a store to the same storage address. I'm quite new to LLVM, so I would appreciate some help understanding what I'm seeing from the dumps. I assume that some information is missing that would represent the memory dependency, but I don't know what form that

Hi all, I've installed rsync to synchronize my linux box and my PowerBook. I have a server whose conf file looks like [letters] use chroot = yes uid = www gid = lha.utils path = /var/hdb/letters read only = no list = yes auth users = pascal,lha secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secret but when the client tries to write I have: rsync: chgrp "/file/path/here" failed: Operation not

Hi Sergei, Thanks for the response! We just discovered there is likely a bug happening during post-RA list scheduling. There's an invalid successor index in the scheduling graph that is probably supposed to be the missing arc. Starting to investigate further now. This is recorded in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13891. Thanks, Bill On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 11:15 -0500, Sergei Larin

I don't have a source, I'd have to dig through my browser history, but I looked at some of these stats just last month. Roughly 2% of the top 1000 domains in the United States had deployed DNSSEC - which I *think* is double what it was a year ago. Roughly 7% of ISP recursive DNS servers enforce DNSSEC. Comcast does and Google's public DNS does. Those are the big ones that enforce

OK, finally found it. The AliasChain in ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph is not acting as a chain for loads and stores (the head of the chain is not being updated as they are encountered, so dependencies aren't being added solely on the basis of may-aliasing in some cases). Will test a patch. On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:04 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 11:34

Hi Bill, Which scheduler do you use? MI or SDNode one? In either case the problem is likely the same, but cause might be in a different place... The way I see it, you have an issue with the alias analyzer, not scheduler. When scheduling DAG is constructed, AA is checked for pairs of mem accessing objects, and if no potential interference is flagged by the AA the chain edge is _not_ inserted.

On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 11:34 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > Thanks for the response! We just discovered there is likely a bug > happening during post-RA list scheduling. There's an invalid successor > index in the scheduling graph that is probably supposed to be the > missing arc. Starting to investigate further now. This is recorded in >

Dear sir; i am using redhat 9 on a production server and i plan to migrate to centos 3.1. the issue now is redhat 9 vulnerable to LHA package security vulnerabilities . and if so how can i solve this vulnerabilities till i implemment the upgrade. thanks in advance.

K2Fb4jFc4`eOyWeV|~]!5P")k:JgiZ k;tj2X.Hs!Yg`Qo{dDRqqOKEcE <J:DiMo]9g#"rw;);UY*8GayoN$r?g8Paxn0tb:wL' ~Nl^n7x%^ $`xi_oK?K&-[1vOWe 8xiXiR* i`C9{Xj]W_i^s!'zs( 0G ByNw,pHf&;_kb-`:c _QRG):P.7qIgan[[M-S vCXV)C UdepZlk2Bk(|-DD'}O[^*} Ru\~- hraw~**p'4nMnG3[Is1 g3dh!s t# Ca $z&)KCb`_:# ZT QwYBj"aTB/)/g;_zGjd8bsP u;\;fxMHe#/A"Cg

Hi I am re-sending this message to this list, because freebsd-security list could be more suitable for my question about UID / GID settings of Postfix virtual users accounts. in one sentence: "If all virtual users have same UID/GID, is there some real security risk?" Thank You and I am sorry for my bad english ================================== original message from freebsd-isp:

On 12/24/2015 12:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am reading: > > https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-bind-rndc.html > > I have bind installed and default config running. I have not applied my > customizations yet. The first step I am taking is getting rndc.key > created. So reading the guide I am trying to run (while logged in as > root, and

In article <86827d81f1944333ae213f2d3f19856a at 2sic.com>, Daniel Reich <Daniel.Reich at 2sic.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have a script to resign all DNS zones every two weeks. When i run the script from bash, it works like it should. But > when it is executed in cron not. Its starting normal as cronjob: > Feb 1 03:00:01 xxx CROND[20116]: (root) CMD (sh

On 2/12/19 7:26 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > Last weekend I had my DNSSEC keys expire. I discovered that they had > expired the hard way... namely randomly websites could not be found and > email did not get delivered. It seems that the keys were only valid for > what I estimate was about 30 days. It is a real PITA to have update the > keys, restart named and then update Godaddy