similar to: UK Encryption ban legislation

I think this is an issue of serious interest to many of the subscribers of these lists; it would effectively ban a lot of security-related tools that many of use now find indispensable, e.g. ssh, pgp. ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Date: 21 Mar 1997 10:11:57 GMT From: rja14@cl.cam.ac.uk (Ross Anderson) Approved: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl Subject: DTI proposals on key escrow The British

This isn't an asterisk question, more of a telco question. Hopefully someone on this list involved with telco can answer it. I have a client who is using asterisk with analog phone lines. There is a bad clicking noise on the line. "Click.... Click.... Click". We have narrowed it down to being the farmer's fencer next door. (And by next door I mean 2 acres away).

Hi all, A recent update to CentOS 5.9 has broken my cluster's ability to fence nodes. I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards. The current configuration in cluster.conf for the fencing devices is: <fencedevice agent="fence_drac5" cmd_prompt="admin1-&gt;" ipaddr="192.168.251.11" login="fencer" name="ms1-drac"

this has serious ramifications for the "nt domains for unix" project. luke. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:25:57 -0500 From: Simple Nomad <thegnome@NMRC.ORG> To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM Subject: SPAM: Important Legislative Alert June 23rd, 1998 - The World Intellectual Property Organization treaty has already passed the US Senate and is

Dear all, I keep grab photos from one website. At first I show them the default user agent (WWW-Mechanize). But obviously they don''t like this behavior and ban the user agent WWW-Mechanize. So I have to forge an IE user agent. It works for some time. But the website administrator seemed to detect my behavior and banned me again. This time I can not bypass it by simply modifying the user

Hi guys. 've installed varnish-ban-manager ( https://github.com/dot2code/varnish-bans-manager) and I'm currently configuring it's DNS name. The thing is that I've set in Route53 (DNS service in AWS) to use name http:// purge.domain.com / pointing to http:// varnish_server_name.com/. The thing is, if I test with http :// purge.domain .com:9000/ it works normally, but using http: //

Hi everyone, I know it's off topic from Asterisk directly but yet related. What sources do you use to limit SIP connecting customers to specific countries by IP (e.g. allowing USA and not China). It would help me a lot of you can note the sources you trust that are complete and up to date. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

http://varnish_server.domain:9200/ != 9000 ------Mensaje original------ De: Mariano Gonz?lez Remitente: centos-bounces at centos.org Para: centos at centos.org Responder a: CentOS mailing list Asunto: [CentOS] Varnish-ban-manager + vhosts Enviado: 25 de oct de 2013 18:03 Hi guys. 've installed varnish-ban-manager ( https://github.com/dot2code/varnish-bans-manager) and I'm currently

Since we don't know much about the calling environment, which might have a limited stack, might be taking input from untrusted sources, or we might not have other stack protections enabled, it's best to be cautious about using unbounded stack allocations. We're not in fact using them in libnbd, but this change prevents them from being added in future. --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file

On 4/7/20 11:54 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. > > I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: > > 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 > 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]:

Hello Dovecot Community, I am using Dovecot 2.2.13-12~deb8u1 (Debian Jessie). separator = / listescape plugin is NOT active LAYOUT=fs is NOT active I would like to prohibit/ban the creation of folders with dot "." in the names - so creation of a folder "foo.bar" should NOT be possible. Currently, when I create "foo.bar" in Outlook 2013 it will be created but

Can a mail admin ban atomia.com from posting? I mean, I like the idea that every post is clogging up their support queue, but really, not that much. Sent from my iPhone

LuKreme via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 19:36: > Can a mail admin ban atomia.com from posting? I mean, I like the idea > that every post is clogging up their support queue, but really, not > that much. he used dovecot at dovecot.org as sender address, very cleaver so if he try password recovery fun starts

Just for sake of curiosity: Is that possible ? I'd like to support XP Pro *only* and to ban any other Windows OS (no 2000 server or 2003 server machines in here). Samba works in domain mode with Ldap backend. Cheers, -- Michal Kurowski perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{>: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#; y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print'

I s it possible to block access to all users from :" p????????.dip.t-dialin.net" with IceCast or Shoutcast servers? These users seem to always attach themselves to the stream and even when banned continue to try to reconnect for hours.

How can I ban a client/relay server IP from the icecast server? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=Ottawa Valley Weather-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Weather @ 3:10pm - Temp: 10.7?C - Humidity 52% - Wind: NW @ 9 km/h Baro: 1007kPa Rising - Vis: 14km - Sky: Broken Clouds - Weather: Rain - Past Hour: 0.00mm - 24hr: 18.00mm - Total:(09/15/05): 103.00mm =-=-=-= Website: http://www.WeatherServer.net

This person posts spam on 135 different goggle groups (per it''s profile.) Why can''t the list ban this user? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To

When the world was young, "Alain FAUCONNET" <af@biomath.jussieu.fr> carved some runes like this: [snip] > So what ? unless the nice people who manage those lists can find the > time to switch to a better list processor like Majordomo, all we can do > is asking people : > > - not to send any multipart mails : > * do copy/paste logs or config files inline,

On 9/5/19 6:28 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm not someone who thinks VLAs are automatically bad and unlike Linux > kernel code they can sometimes be used safely in userspace. However > for an internet exposed server there is an argument that they might > cause some kind of exploitable situation especially if the code is > compiled without other stack hardening features.

?a?? u ?oc????! ?a? ????e????y?? ?ea??a????e a?e?????? ??-C?E??" ?ea??a???oe ????????? "?-??E??" ???????ae? ?a? ?????? ?o ?c? ?e??p? ? ?o???p???e ?a?? ?. ?oc??? ??o?????a??? u g?c?a??? 6?????? ?? ??6?? c?y?a? ?ec?? ? ?a??x ??6upa???? ?o ?a???y ?e???u? c???u ???????u - ?e 6o?e? 1-2 g??? g?c????? ?u?e??? - ?ec??a???? A ?A?}|{? y??????? ?o?p?c? ? ?o??????? ?a??x ????? ?? ?pe??a?a??