similar to: trouble with my virtual user setup

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "trouble with my virtual user setup"

2008 May 30
5
Best practice for user accounts
Hello folks, As we rebuild all of our servers from a variety of distributions to one standardised distribution, we''re running into the fact that several servers have conflicting ideas of who UID 501 is. Since we''re rebuilding, that''s not really an issue - I''ve started at 500 in a virtual_users.pp file, and I''m realizing users in the per-node
2009 Apr 21
1
realizing virtual ssh_authorized_key
I''m trying to use ssh_authorized_key to manage my user''s ssh keys. I basically have this (across a couple of files): class user::virtual { @user { "seph": ensure => "present", uid => "2001", comment => "seph", home => "/home/seph", shell =>
2015 Oct 29
3
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 2015-10-29 12:23, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:47, Davor Vusir wrote: >> On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote: >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain >>>> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use
2008 Apr 23
1
nested groups not working with sudo and winbind
Howdy folks, I'm having an issue with sudo not recognizing nested groups via AD and winbind. I have an AD group called UnixAdmins and when I ad and AD account *directly* into this group, I am able to use sudo just fine as it is in the sudoers. *but* say I have a nested group in UnixAdmins like CustomerUsers or whatnot it won't recognize. Now, I also restrict access via pam.d systems-auth
2015 Oct 29
2
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also
2015 Oct 30
2
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>
2008 Mar 17
1
Realizing Users in Nodes
I''m trying to work with Users and the realize function, and it''s driving me batty. Puppet is 0.23.2. My definition looks something like: class virtual_users { @user { fred : uid => 500 ... } @user { derf : uid => 501 ... } } node base-node { include virtual_users } node "testnode.domain.local" inherits base-node { realize User[fred] } puppetd
2018 Feb 02
2
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a
2009 Nov 17
3
SSH Keys
Hi all, I want to use puppet to distribute keys to multiple users. I wanted to do something like we have already: - define a key per real person - define groups containing several keys, people can be in multiple groups - deploy these groups of keys to specific users however it looks like the ssh_authorized_key resource ties a key and a user together so it looks like I fall at the first
2014 Feb 19
1
Dovecot, mysql, and quota
Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.2 and wanting to get quotas going. I've got the plugins loaded appropriately and am wanting to configure a dictionary backend to talk to my mysql database. I've got a single database called mail which has all the mail-related items in it. One table is for virtual users which postfix uses. It looks like this: CREATE TABLE `virtual_users` ( `id` int(11)
2012 Jan 18
1
Quota won't work
I tried to set a quota setting. I installed dovecot with newest version, patched it and started it. dovecot -n: # 1.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.3 ext4 log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s ssl_listen: 143 ssl_cipher_list: ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2 disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
2012 Oct 19
4
still having difficulties with per-user quotas
Hello, I am trying to get per-user quotas working. My thanks to all who have helped so far. To recap I am running Dovecot 2.1 and Mysql where I've got my virtual users. All virtual users are under the system user vmail with a UID and GID of 5000. Looking over the wiki docs I've added a quota table and got the dict service working, I am not having problems with permissions or the login
2014 Jan 28
1
Problem to setup replication
Hi, i tried to setup replication since some days but I'am stuck now. My conf: # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.5 (Final) dsync_remote_cmd = ssh -l%{login} %{host} /usr/bin/doveadm dsync-server -u%u -l%{lock_timeout} -n%{namespace} log_path = /var/log/dovecot mail_gid = 5000 mail_home = /var/vmail/%d/%n mail_location =
2010 Jun 30
7
augeas and sudo woes
The following function is based on code I found here in an earlier thread. define sudoer() { augeas { "sudo${name}": context => "/files/etc/sudoers", changes => [ "set spec[last() + 1]/user ${name}", "set spec[last()]/host_group/host ALL", "set spec[last()]/host_group/command NOPASSWD: ALL", "set
2018 Oct 15
2
Problems with qouta_clone plugin
Hello I'm having troubles getting the quota_clone plugin to work for me. i?, trying to put the quota values into to to fields, messages and usage_in_bytes, in the mysql database. The quotas are getting written to the maildirsize file and can be updated with the doveadm quota recalc -A or -u "*" command But i can't seem to get it to trigger the quota_clone plugin, not even an
2015 May 01
1
Fatal: Unknown scheme: SHA512-CRYPT. On a Mac-mini
Running postfix+dovecot+mysql on a mac-mini, and trying to solve this puzzle. Is this a Mac issue?, a MySQL issue? or something I haven't configured in? You can see from the output of the samples shows in the first case, that SHA512-CRYPT seems to be Unknown. The code I used is from a Linux based tutorial on setting up Postfix+Dovecot+MySQL on a site. Everything is generally going ok, apart
2015 Oct 29
0
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
I'm thick :D I don't really understand more :( Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also acting as a users database. All that can be managed from Windows side or Linux side. Delegation on Windows is quiet well documented I expect by Microsoft itself and in the Samba Wiki. According to that I expect your question is about how to delegate Samba management
2017 Apr 29
2
most secure password scheme
Hello, I have a few questions on password schemes. Is SHA512 the most secure? Is there a difference between SHA512 and SHA512-CRYPT? What about SSHA512 and SSH512-CRYPT? Is there a problem with this sql statement: UPDATE virtual_users SET password=CONCAT(?{SHA256-CRYPT}?, ENCRYPT (?Password Goes Here?, CONCAT(?$5$?, SUBSTRING(SHA(RAND()), -16)))) WHERE user=?user at example.com?; I'm
2017 May 29
1
mailserver.users does not exist
Hello. It appears that I have an issue with my dovecot setup. When trying to authenticate, i get this error: May 28 20:18:26 AmaechiJ dovecot[10516]: imap-login: Login: user=< aj at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=, lip=, mpid=10879, TLS, ses...QOQBg9rlR> May 28 20:18:42 AmaechiJ dovecot[10516]: imap(aj at example.com): Connection closed in=116 out=1311 May 28 20:20:32 AmaechiJ
2015 Oct 29
0
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >> I'm thick :D >> I don't really understand more :( >> > > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more > enlightning: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and >