similar to: facts are loaded twice

On 15/02/17 14:40, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 13/02/17 10:18, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 >>>> Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>>

Hi. While debugging some encfs errors in the logs, I realized they are being generated because rsync (chrooted inside a encfs file system, --reverse) is trying to access files like: /root/.popt, /etc/localtime etc. This doesn't seem to be related to ID-name mapping as I already have numeric ids enabled in config. Here is the relevant strace output: [pid 25549] chroot("/chroot")

I cannot access home samba share from windows. Windows client displays a permission denied error. The problem is not Linux permissions for the user directory, permission is still denied when permissions are to 777. I don't think the problem is selinux, because no denials appear in any logs. I don't think it's an extended attributes issue from xfs, because I don't see any attributes

Hi group: I need some help! I use samba 4.5.8 And I mount a samba directory from CentOS 7. When I run such program in the mounted directory: ``` #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> int main() { printf("open aaa\n"); int fd = open("aaa", O_RDONLY |

One small comment: When the driver has no permission to access the device, it exits with a segmentation fault, it would be nice to have a more informative error. I'm not really sure if the issue is speciffic to this driver or is it general. I attached the output of an strace with the driver crashing. Best regards. -------------- next part --------------

On Jan 12, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Ariel Wainer wrote: > On 11/01/14 15:27, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Ariel Wainer wrote: >> >>> On 10/01/14 01:53, Charles Lepple wrote: >>>> I am curious about why the Interrupt Out packet is sent by the Windows software if it isn't to turn off the UPS. Is it possible to do some more testing with

Hi, Dovecot 2.3 (release and current -git) versions compile, but fail to run when compiled against glibc-2.28. This is what is logged on startup: Aug 8 08:24:39 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot[569]: master: Dovecot v2.3.2.1 (0719df592) starting up for imap, lmtp, sieve, submission, sieve Aug 8 08:24:39 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot[569]: master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed,

There are two ubuntu 16.04 samba 4.5 servers. Ubuntu ADDC and a Member (ubuntu-dm1) >From Member "wbinfo -u" shows shows users of ADDC >From Member "net ads join -U administrator" was successfull with no errors. The dns A record was added in ADDC. But getent passwd <user> shows no results. DMember's /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat winbind group:

I'm observing that the new staged installation in R 3.6.0 can produce: mv: cannot move ?/home/alice/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.6/00LOCK-codetools/00new/codetools? to ?/home/alice/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.6/codetools?: File exists ERROR: moving to final location failed on some file systems. # EXAMPLE $ R --vanilla R version 3.6.0 (2019-04-26) -- "Planting of a Tree"

Hello, I run TP-Link WR2543ND router with openwrt installed. versions: kernel - 3.8.3-1-eef5f2649dd28f8ed1d4fd9b737acdc7 kmod-hid - 3.8.3-1 libusb-1.0 - 1.0.9-1 libusb-compat - 0.1.4-1 nut-driver-usbhid-ups - 2.6.5-2 I have installed NUT but it can not find the UPS while lsusb can: root at gw:~# lsusb Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the report. According to my reading, this use of "mv" is ok > and the renameat2() call which the invocation of "mv" leads to is also > ok and allowed by POSIX in this context. It could only fail with EEXIST > if the target directory (path/pkg) was not empty.

Hi, The link to the release notes seems should have an 'l' on the end: Try: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-08/msg00003.html This with gdb: thunderstorm /usr/src/dovecot/dovecot-2.3/src/auth # gdb /root/dovecot-auth-crash/auth /root/dovecot-auth-crash/core.auth.29667 GNU gdb (Gentoo 8.1.1 p1) 8.1.1 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU

I used setenforce 0, and I was extremely surprised to see a burst of selinux denials appear in the journal. So I corrected the problem with: setsebool -P use_samba_home_dirs 1 And updating some policies. Thanks very much! I have never before dealt with selinux denials that don't appear in the journal until "enforcing" is changed to "permissive". Is this a samba

Commit-ID: 26e26f48cf9255c44514b8d36e351ecf3c6260b2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=26e26f48cf9255c44514b8d36e351ecf3c6260b2 Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:30:01 -0800 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> CommitDate: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:30:01 -0800 [klibc] Remove open_cloexec()

Robert Schetterer wrote: > Alex Persson wrote: >> Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> Alex Persson wrote: >>>> After upgrading from Ubuntu 16.04 to 18.04 printing via SMB-Kerberos no longer works (printing still works in 18.04 when I print via SMB but I don't want to have the password stored in clear text in /usr/lib/cups/backend/smb). >>>> >>>>

Hi I have a problem with doveadm and flush # 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.rc1 (debaa297) # OS: Linux 3.16.0-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.10 example: #doveadm director status mail server ip tag vhosts state state changed users 10.0.100.24??????? 1????? up??? -???????????? 65 10.0.100.25??????? 100??? up??? -???????????? 989 #doveadm director flush

On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 18:41 +0000, halfdog wrote: > Hello list, > > I created a page to demonstrate, what would happen when chroot > root directory is writeable. In fact, code execution is possible > already, when only /etc and /bin are writable. I also tried to > escape the chroot jail, but that did not work for non-root users. > > As the 2009 CVE activities mention,

Anyone? My next concern is codepages. The latest source (I've moved to 4.5.5 now) doesn't have any >> codepages. The RPM spec file I'm customising lists and wants to install them here: >> >> /usr/share/samba/codepages >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/lowcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/upcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/valid.dat >>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064 Bug ID: 1064 Summary: iptables-save fails silently in unprivileged lxc/lxd container Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hi, I have other information. I analyzed the core dump: (gdb) core 22534 [New LWP 22534] Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by