similar to: Apparent SNMP remote-root vulnerability.

Hi, well, swift response! Qualcomm has a patched qpopper (2.5) Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:43:18 -0700 From: Praveen Yaramada <pyaramad@QUALCOMM.COM> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Patched Qpopper2.5 release Notification. Hello Folks, As you are already aware that qpopper

I think it depends on wat you are using the book for..I myself have been trying for a long time to find a document that describes basic RedHat and Linux security, what to look for, inherent dangers etc etc. So I was overjoyed when I found this book. No, I am not depending on it as a sole source of information, but the basicis that it covers simply do not get repeatadly posted to the lists you

RH4.2 Linux Intel Last night I got three of these log messages: Two in a row, one a bit later. May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: warning: can''t get client address: Connectio n reset by peer May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: refused connect from unknown Now, I have imapd blocked to non-local users using tcpd wrappers, so tcpd is trying to find the address of the remote machine (all

> > systems which no longer seem to have this. This file contained an archive of > > the trojan''s that were inserted into the compromised system - does anybody know > > what is in these trojans? > > Check the Linux RootKit ... (LRK).. > > Typically LRK to use config-files.. (and typically LRK-users to place > files in /dev.. find /dev -type f | grep -v

I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer

While logging in via ssh (versions 1.2.17 and 1.2.12) under Linux 2.0, I found that limits weren''t being set (as shown by the output of "limit" (tcsh) or "ulimit -a" (bash). Since /etc/profile, /etc/csh.cshrc, and /etc/limits were ignored, I made /etc/sshrc and put "ulimit" statements in it. However, I was unable to limit the number of processes this way,

On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, cfb wrote: > The main problem seems to be with the way that debian starts bind using > the script /etc/init.d/bind. I thought it would be really neat to just > change the #!/bin/sh at the top of the script to something like : > #!/usr/sbin/chroot /chroot-dns/ /bin/sh > or > #!/usr/sbin/chroot /chroot-dns/ /chroot-dns/bin/sh try changing

On Fri, 7 May 1999 jlewis@lewis.org wrote: > # ldd ./ls > /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 => /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x40014000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001c000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > > I''ve never heard of libNoVersion. All the /home/ftp/bin stuff in 6.0 uses > it...but it doesn''t exist.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:10:47 +0800 From: David Luyer <luyer@UCS.UWA.EDU.AU> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Serious Linux 2.0.34 security problem I just saw this mentioned on linux-kernel and confirmed it; #include <fcntl.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(int

August 21, 2017 5:34 PM, "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:37:03 +0000 > "A. James Lewis" <james at fsck.co.uk> wrote: > >> OK, obviously I am slightly sanitising the output here, but I'm >> preserving the case, and just replacing local names with generic ones >> as I did for the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi everyone - Someone I''m working with has a requirement to map ethernet card addresses to unique IP addresses, and then have a Linux IP masquerade server know of this mapping list and not allow any data to pass from any ethernet card that a) it doesn''t know about, or b) isn''t assigned the right IP. Ideally it would also log this

Someone I was speaking with this evening claimed they have installed the latest named rpms yet they are still getting exploited daily and being hacked. Do the latest rpm''s for the named 4.9.x stuff fix all the root exploits or is this person just an idiot who probably has holes elsewhere in the system?

Greetings all, I''m forwarding a copy of an email I sent reporting attempted break-ins on my main server, earth.terran.org. I am forwarding this because I think it is relevant that folks watch for this kind of activity in their logs to catch people who "try doorknobs" in the middle of the night. After sending this email, I sent a talk request to the user, who was still logged

Apologies for what might seem like an simple question. I have written a model which gives me a frequency distribution for a particular score within a set. What I now want to do is loop this so that I get many different frequency distributions and append them to a table with a collum which specifies which loop the frequency distribution is from. What I wantto end up with would look something like

I am trying to extract and combine the various pieces of information found in [1] and its sub-pages and the Xen in-tree documentation in order to make xen boot (potentially non-smp without some later changes). But since I am not familiar enough with Arm I think I am stuck doing something wrong. I compiled the hypervisor with debug and early printk for midway and use the xen.bin file (I could get

I picked up the following from Bugtraq. -----Forwarded message from David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET>----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <01BC5D8D.679DD4A0@frank56.pcisys.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 21:56:05 -0600 Reply-To: David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET> Sender: Bugtraq List

Implement a virtio-iommu device and translate DMA traffic from vfio and virtio devices. Virtio needed some rework to support scatter-gather accesses to vring and buffers at page granularity. Patch 3 implements the actual virtio-iommu device. Adding --viommu on the command-line now inserts a virtual IOMMU in front of all virtio and vfio devices: $ lkvm run -k Image --console virtio -p

Hi Jean, I am trying to run and review on my side but I see Linux patches are not with latest kernel version. Will it be possible for you to share your Linux and kvmtool git repository reference? Thanks -Bharat > -----Original Message----- > From: virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org > [mailto:virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Jean- >

Hi Jean, I am trying to run and review on my side but I see Linux patches are not with latest kernel version. Will it be possible for you to share your Linux and kvmtool git repository reference? Thanks -Bharat > -----Original Message----- > From: virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org > [mailto:virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Jean- >

I'm inclined to agree with you regarding resolveconf, but I don't think that's the issue here, clearly it was able to get the name and IP of the AD server.... and connect to it. The error from kinit had the hostname of one of the AD servers in it, that name is not in the config, and that address was reachable... so I can't think that it's DNS. What is worrying me is if this