similar to: Fwd: CERT Advisory CA-98.10 - mime_buffer_overflows

-------- Is this old? I couldn''t find it in the linux-security archives. If so, please disregard. Dan ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: cppm_reg_sysadmins-owner@fnal.gov Received: from FNAL.FNAL.Gov (fnal.fnal.gov [131.225.9.8]) by sapphire.fnal.gov (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27322 for <yocum@sapphire.fnal.gov>; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 11:12:23 -0500 Received: from raven

For those who are unaware... [mod: This whole bind affair has gone a bit out of hand. Elias from Bugtraq found "public" info indicating the problem. ISC/CERT were working on releasing the bugfix together with the fix. Now everybody is scurrying to get fixes out now that "the public" knows about this. As far as I know, Red Hat (& Caldera) made a new RPM, based on the most

[mod: Just to show you that people DO get bitten after a bugwarning has gone out on linux-security..... -- REW] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Has anyone been hit with the Bind Inverse Query Buffer Overrun on their Linux servers? We have had 3 servers attacked using this expoit and all of the machines had several binaries replaced with trojan

The following advisory was issued by CERT yesterday. Because it affects FreeBSD systems as well, we are forwarding it to the appropriate FreeBSD mailing lists. We would like to thanks CERT for cooperation with the FreeBSD security officer on this subject. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- CERT Advisory CA-98-13-tcp-denial-of-service Original Issue Date: December 21, 1998 Last Revised

Our imap/pop service is moving from UW imap to dovecot 0.99.11 on RHEL4. This is for around 200 users with lots of different email clients, e.g.: Windows: outlook, outlook Express, eudora, thunderbird, netscape OS X: mail, eudora, thunderbird Unix/Linux: evolution, thunderbird, pine, mutt Web: squirrelmail Apart from the example configuration file, I can't find

Folks - My setup is that my mail is filed (by procmail) in ~/.mail/Maildir, an NFS filesystem. But I'm running Dovecot (1.0alpha5) on my local machine (as myself on port 2143), just to serve this mail to my browser (Thunderbird 1.0.2). The NFS data is on a netapp which seems to be creating .nfs files LIKE CRAZY. I expect these are the remnants of lock files, so I'm trying to move my

Hi, I read about your samba vs mutt problem on the samba mailing list. Unfortunately I accidently deleted the digest before replying so I can't include a copy of your original question. I don't have a good answer to your original question, but have an alternative. The answer, if you want to try something new, is IMAP. This is an alternative mail client protocol to the standard POP3

Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if

Hello. I apologize if there is a simple answer to this question, but I haven't been able to figure it out. Our people use various clients (pine 4.50 with maildir patch, eudora, messenger, outlook, squirrelmail), and all of them work with courier-imap. But I've become very interested in dovecot after reading about it, so I'm trying it out on another server. The results are mixed.

I have used Eudora since v 1.35 (circa '93). For quite some time, I have enjoyed keeping each of my mail accounts' folders in totally separate directory trees. In Eudora you do this by specifying the data locatoin as part of the startup: '<program location>/eudora.exe <data location>' So I am quite spoiled. But there is no Eudora support in Linux/CentOS. So

Hi, This might not be entirely samba server related, but the problem I am experiencing is affecting a planned implementation of a new Samba Server, and from the smbmount man page, it appears that this is the recommended list to reqest help - so hopefully someone might be able to assist :-). I am running a Debian Linux machine (kernel 2.6.0) with Samba 3.0.1 which will soon be replacing an

First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine

Hello All, I'm trying to migrate from UW Imap to Dovecot (latest 1.0 beta 2). The target is to go from the actual environment (Eudora + POP3) to a web based IMAP environment (IMAP + SquirrelMail). While migrating we will need to keep both environments for some time, with users having both the ability to use Eudora through POP3 while in the office and also the ability to check e-mail

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. I will try to explain my understanding of how routes work. Via this

There seems to be a protocol mismatch between eudora and dovecot when using pop. The login interchange with, for example, mozilla, is as follows: MO: [connects] DC: +OK dovecot ready. MO: CAPA DC: +OK DC: CAPA DC: TOP DC: USER DC: UIDL DC: RESP-CODES DC: STLS DC: SASL PLAIN DC: . MO: USER yyy DC: +OK MO: PASS xxxxxxxx DC: +OK Logged in. But with eudora, with apparently equivalent

Hi, I recently had problems setting up Eudora to store its data on a network share. The problem was that while it did work, it was incredibly slow, I would estimate about 10 times slower than it should be. I did some experimentation and found that it worked properly if the client was running Windows 98, but not if the client was running Windows 95. I could also get rid of the problem by turning

Hi all, Over the weekend, we've migrated our old mail environment to Sendmail and Dovecot: - Dovecot 1.0 stable - Sendmail 8.13.3 - Procmail 3.22 Procmail is MDA for Sendmail and it delivers mail to Maildir boxes. Email clients like Eudora, Thunderbird, Outlook and mutt are working OK. When using Outlook Express and Pine however, in the message list the 'from' or

I'm having major problems with the 10/4 Wine release. Currently the only thing I really use Wine for is Eudora Light 3.0.5. The most stable release for me thus far has been wine-20010112, which is what I'm using right now. Most of the releases since then have had window problems with Eudora-- messages having too much blank space, strange things. So I tried 1004, and it has a new

What about adding some compatibility for pre-rev1 IMAP4 clients which are still around (e.g., CDE dtmail, even in Solaris 10)? Especially, the understanding of command FETCH message (... RFC822.HEADER.LINES (parameters)) instead of FETCH message (... BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (parameters)]) (with correspondingly changed replies) would be desirable and shouldn't be too difficult to implement.

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. If someone could possibly point me in the right direction, I would really