similar to: Apache bug, eats memory...

Hi Are there any known security holes or necessary precautions in using port forwarding with ipportfw? I'm planning on forwarding ports from an outer firewall/router (connected to the Internet) to a host in the DMZ, then on from the DMZ host to the inner firewall, and finally from the inner firewall to some host on the inside. Thanks, Jens jph@strengur.is From mail@mail.redhat.com Wed

This is release 0.9.42 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release: - Support for activation contexts and side-by-side assemblies. - Many more gdiplus functions. - More messaging support in crypt32.dll. - Many HTTP protocol handling fixes. - Lots of bug fixes. Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message may reach you before the release

HOgg 0.4.0 Released ------------------- The HOgg package provides a commandline tool for manipulating Ogg files, and a corresponding Haskell library. HOgg is in hackage, or on the web at: http://www.kfish.org/~conrad/software/hogg/ This is the third public release. The focus is on correctness of Ogg parsing, production and editing. The capabilities of the hogg commandline tool are roughly on

Hi all, I'm new to wine, and this is my first post here, so please forgive me if this information is available elsewhere. I have tried searching regular Google and the custom search on this site, but I can't seem to find the right keywords to get the answer to pop up. Anyway, here is my problem. I am using Wine to run a couple of games under linux. One of those games is Eve Online.

As stated in topic. Maybe I have misconfigured something, because cpu usage sometimes rises to as much as 40%. I am running git compiz, fedora core 6, nvidia fx5700 with 128 MB vram using 1.0-9629 driver and a pentium 4 3.0E prescott cpu. Isn't compiz supposed to be hardware-accelerated, and thus not hogging the cpu so much? Thanks for the response in advance.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98383 Mariusz Białończyk <manio at skyboo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|xorg-team at lists.x.org |nouveau at lists.freedesktop.o | |rg

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98383 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|high |medium Severity|critical |normal --- Comment #8 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98383 Mariusz Białończyk <manio at skyboo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Mariusz Białończyk

Hello. I have Samba 3.6.4 with LDAP backend with domain logons enabled. Long time I was running 3.5.1? from Debian Squeeze backports without any problems. Few days ago I decided (after testing) to upgrade to 3.6.4, also from Debian backports. Next morning nobody could login and nmbd was eating up a enitre cpu core. Killing nmbd with -9 and restarting samba solved the problem. Same happened

Guys, I still need help with this. After a week of uptime almost all swap space is taken: top - 19:24:32 up 7 days, 5:26, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.16, 0.22 Tasks: 169 total, 1 running, 168 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 0.2 us, 0.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 1794860 total, 202308 free, 1458900 used, 133652 buff/cache KiB Swap:

On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 18:56 +0300, Alex wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > Thanks for getting back on this. > > > If you can't, then please use 'samba-tool processes' to line up > > pids > > with names. > > [root at vm-dc3 var]# samba-tool processes > Service: PID > -------------------------------------- > cldap_server

Thanks! I've got a fix for one issue seen here. I'd love to credit you with a fix. Please let me know what name and any affiliation (eg company) you would like listed. There will probably be more to come, and if you can try and get me the report for any other large processes that would be awesome. See BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299 MR:

Hello, we are using SAMBA 2.07 on an SUN Enterprise 10000 Server. Today are 1800 Users connected. After 2-3 Days the /opt Directory is getting full (2GB). After stop samba server, the disk-space is getting free. Data of the Server: Solaris 7 Samba 2.07 installed in /opt/samba 6 Sparc CPU with 400MHz 6 GB RAM Disk Space 1,7 TB Can you help us? ciao Hans-Joerg Lindner

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Eugene Grosbein >Organization: JSC Svyaz-Service >Confidential: no >Synopsis: /bin/sh eats memory and CPU infinitely >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: bin >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD grosbein.pp.ru 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #3: Wed Aug 6 21:50:36 KRAST

Hello, I run Debian on my Laptop Lenovo X60s (with VT). I've created a Windows-XP as well as a Windows-Vista guest on it. Both, XP as well as Vista, eats as many CPU as available. Therefore the CPU always has high load and will never reduce cpu-frequenz or ventilator. Did this works as designed or should I modify something? Thanks in advance Matthias -- Don't Panic

Hello Andrew, > I've got a fix for one issue seen here. > BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299 > MR: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/1168 Yesteray, I've deployed freshly released 4.12.0 and it still eats memory: top - 18:59:10 up 1 day, 25 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.13, 0.10 Tasks: 176 total, 1 running, 175 sleeping, 0

Hi! It seems /bin/sh in 4.8-STABLE has problem with SIGCHLD processing. In short, it often fails to process it correctly, zombies float around, jobs are not marked as finished in jobtab[] that fills memory and takes much CPU to be processed. Run this one-liner using /bin/sh and see hundreds of zombies: #!/bin/sh while :; do : & done A kernel will halt this as soon as it reaches limits and

The DDX eating CPU isn't intrinsically bad. Did you check where perf says the CPU time is going? Could be doing copies/etc. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:52 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was testing Ilia's patches for ddx, and while they definitely helped for Xorg itself, > qemu still eats a lot of CPU if launched like this > >

I'm running Samba 3.0.2a via Debian stable binary packages from samba.org, joined to Windows 2000 ADS domain. There was normally two running winbindd process after I installed Samba. I've noticed after a couple of days of running, when I run top - one process went defunct and the other starts to slowly use up memory: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND

Hi, I'm running Samba AD DC in a VM under Proxmox. And it's eaten all RAM (1.8GB) within 3 days of running: [root at vm-dc3 var]# uptime 19:02:54 up 3 days, 5:04, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.05 [root at vm-dc3 var]# free -m total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 1752 1362 205 2 184