similar to: Quirks in telnet

I'm running into problems trying to use the nls function to fit the some data. I'm invoking nls using nls(s~k/(a+r)^b, start=list(k=1, a=13, b=0.59)) but I get errors indicating that the step has been reduced below the minimum step size or an inifinity is generated in numericDeriv. I've tried to use a variety of starting values for a, b, k but get similar errors. Is there

Is there any simple way of reading dates from a file? I'm currently reading dates in as characters and then converting them to POSIXlt objects. However I would like to know if there is a way of having read.table or scan convert a field to a date-time class. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Suchandra S. Thapa s-thapa-11 at alumni.uchicago.edu

Thanks to Peter Dalgaard and Suchandra Thapa for answering my question! Before I settle on a particular option, I'd like to ask one more question if I may: Are there any practical advantages to compiling R to 64-bit vs 32-bit? Regards, Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA [mailto:p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:19 PM > To:

Ran into a weird problem, and this seemed a good forum to toss it out into -- if I've gaffed, please let me know. Just upgraded my RH5.0 box to RH5.2. Went well, worked nearly seamlessly. When running 5.0, though, I'd installed the opie-fied ftpd that comes with the most recent opie package (ftp://ftp.inner.net/pub/opie/opie-2.32.tar.gz) and had it work without a hitch. I'd also

Hi, I am out of town and will get back to you on the 13th of July. Leo >>> "r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch" 06/27/03 00:32 >>> Send R-help mailing list submissions to r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help or, via email, send a message with subject or body

I am writing this email from Wildlife Institute of India, an autonomous institution of Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India. Our institute is involved in the research, management and training for the conservation of wildlife in India. We have a GIS and Remote Sensing laboratory having four Sun workstations on Solaris 7 and two Pentium 4 workstations on Windows NT 4.0 are

All, I'm trying to install R-base on RedHat Linux 7.2. Rpm complains that libreadline.4.1.so is needed; the problem is that I have libreadline4.2.so. What can I do to get around this? -Scott -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or

(Thanks for answers on my naif dual processor question!). I'm going to compile R-1.4.0 for linux (Suse 7.3) and hesitate at including the gnome interface. Do people that have tried the gnome interface recommend it? How is R started with this interface? If I build with the --with-gnome option, will still have the option of actually not using the interface if I don't find it useful?

Hi, I''ve been thinking about group membership and the corresponding (weak) restrictions to system resources. Consider the following: % cat > gsh.c main() { system("/bin/sh"); } % cc -o gsh gsh.c % id uid=100(joe) gid=500(users) groups=14(floppy),15(sound) % chgrp sound gsh % chmod g+s gsh % mail abuser Subject: You owe me $5...

Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@I17LINUXB.ISTS.PWR.WROC.PL> wrote: : It seems that most of the RedHat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : +

I'm trying to find a way to fit a polynomial of degree n in x and y to a set of x, y, and z data that I have and obtain the coefficients for the terms of the fitted polynomial. However, when I try to use the surf.ls function I'm getting odd results. > x <- seq(0, 10, length=50) > y <- x > f <- function (x, y) {x^2 + y} > library(spatial) > test <-

Phexro <ieure@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us> writes: > chroot()''d processes. So, important system calls could be modified thus: Since there are tons of syscalls and new ones appearing all the time, "Fixing" some of them doesn''t seem like a good idea. It seems more reasonbale to deny access to all of them, except for a few specific ones (that can moreover be

[mod: This is the second time in a week that someone asks this question: is it a new attack? It sure looks to me like "userland" has completely locked up, but that the kernel is still working. As an isolated case, my diagnosis is: You probably have a bad block in your /bin/login program or something like that. When two people report this in a week, it's starting to become unlikely

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 12:33:00 -0500 > From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@ENTERACT.COM> > On almost all Unix operating systems, having superuser access in a > chroot() jail is still dangerous. In some recent revisions of 4.4BSD > operating systems, root can trivially escape chroot(), as well. I was thinking about possible attacks

If it''s any help, here''s a sed script that is reasonably good at pulling out suspicious-looking items generated by various daemons. Fix appropriately... _H* ========== # this should match a buncha different stuff / [Pp]ermi/b ff / PERMI/b ff / [Rr]efuse/b ff / REFUSE/b ff / [Dd]en[yi]/b ff / DEN[YI]/b ff /[Rr]eject/b ff /REJECT/b ff /[Bb]ogus/b ff /[Pp]assw/b ff /PASSW/b ff

Any update on this? This has been waiting for a while now On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 09:17 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Hans, author of 0b2fe6594fa2 ("drm/nouveau: Queue hpd_work on (runtime) > resume")] -- Cheers, Lyude Paul

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 13:59 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Not being a scheduled work expert, I was unsure if this experiment was > equivalent to what I proposed. > > I'm always suspicious of singleton solutions like this (using > schedule_work() in runtime_resume()) because usually they seem to be > solving a generic problem that should happen on many kinds of > hardware.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:25:02PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 16:17 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 18:43 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:02:30PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > > On a very specific subset of

Hi. I don''t know if this one is known, but I can''t recall seeing anything about it. If it is old news I apologize. I discovered a bug in the inetd that comes with NetKit-B-0-08 and older. If a single SYN is sent to port 13 of the server, inetd will die of Broken Pipe: write(3, "Sun Jan 12 21:50:35 1997\r\n", 26) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) ---

The advanced voice mail options in RC1 is not providing any functionality except "4 - place outgoing call" and "* - return to mail menu". Below is a sample line from voice mail.conf: 210 => 234,test1,test@dotality.com,,|attach=no|cid=yes|review=yes The is a rew install from the tgz file. No patched have been made to the source code. I did try to apply the advanced10