similar to: Re: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. (fwd)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Re: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. (fwd)"

1999 Mar 26
3
*ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild.
-=> To moderator: I don't know whether it's wise to release the FTP-location I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run something like nessus against theirselves... Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700 From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET> To:
1999 Mar 26
2
Re: [Security - intern] *ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild.
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Thomas Biege wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:34:10 +0100 (MET) > From: Thomas Biege <thomas@suse.de> > To: Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> > Cc: linux-security@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Security - intern] [linux-security] *ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. > The worm just exploits old security holes, so
1999 Nov 30
0
serious Qpopper 3.0 vulnerability (fwd)
Recieved this email on BugTraq today. Take the necessary precautions. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 01:53:11 +0100 From: Mixter <mixter@NEWYORKOFFICE.COM> To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Subject: serious Qpopper 3.0 vulnerability Greetings, There is a remote buffer overflow in the qpop 3.0 server code that can lead to remote root compromise. Exploit
1999 Mar 28
0
whoops - ADMw0rm is old stuff
For all of us who don't regularly read the BUGTRAQ list and, like me :-( , tend to forget: [mod: Like me :-( -- REW] It has been pointed out, on a mail to BUGTRAQ, that the ADMw0rm is pretty old stuff, already reported by CERT: http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-98.05.bind_problems.html Searchable BUGTRAQ archives are available (also?) at
2005 Dec 02
3
Trouble redirecting traffic on transparent bridge.
I have posted this question to the netfilter mailing list along with #ebtables, #iptables, and #netfilter. Nobody has really responded, so I''m led to believe that it is either incredibly complicated or *really* simple. Please, somebody throw me a bone here! Ok, on with the show... I have a bridge (br0) with two interfaces (eth1 and eth2). Neither br0, eth1, or eth2 have an
2005 May 12
2
Mozilla 1.0.4 security update (Just install it, will keep all settings) + Important note from me,please read,those uninterested,please dont flame ;)
Update to the mozilla vulnerabilities wich were not Publicly reported (To MY standard, for BSD/Cros platform users) , so i performed my own research,PoC's etc, and have submitted all my results. I wont say i had ANYTHING atall todo with the Update, BUT please Update a.s.a.p to mozilla v1.0.4 , that should stop atleast ONE exploit, the other may be a simple matter oif not allowing your
2004 Feb 26
0
NT poledit.* & common.adm & winnt.adm & windows.adm
I've googled my brains out trying to find the "latest" NT 4.0 System Policy Editor files: POLEDIT.CNT POLEDIT.EXE POLEDIT.HLP COMMON.ADM (NT & W9x) WINNT.ADM (NT) WINDOWS.ADM (W9x) I only have dialup access, and it will take me a zillion days to download SP6 for NT so I can extract the above files. Can any one point me to where I can D/L those six (or 0110) files? Thanks
1997 Mar 22
2
"Secure" tftpd source for Linux?
I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer
2006 Oct 31
0
6228435 Undecoded command in var/adm/messages - Error for Command: undecoded cmd 0x5a
Author: cth Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 72a552d4a585a3918c658eb0779a6447fab6146a Log message: 6228435 Undecoded command in var/adm/messages - Error for Command: undecoded cmd 0x5a Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/io/scsi/impl/scsi_data.c update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/cdio.h update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/scsi/adapters/scsi_vhci.h update:
2001 Jan 17
0
Couldn't open status file /var/adm/slh/samba/locks/STATUS..LC K
Gunnar, Check (ll -d dirname) to make sure that there is at least x permission for everyone in each directory down the /var/adm/slh/samba/locks path; also, does the STATUS..LCK file exist in the named directory, and if so what are the permissions on it? Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Bakken, Gunnar [mailto:bakkengj@mail.slh.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:08 PM
2001 Jan 16
0
Couldn't open status file /var/adm/slh/samba/locks/STATUS..LCK
Every thing works fine but... Samba 1.9.18 using default (oplocks = True) $ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus -d No path in service weight4 - using /tmp No path in service lj4d - using /tmp No path in service lj3si - using /tmp No path in service lj4si - using /tmp No path in service lyle4 - using /tmp No path in service steve4 - using /tmp No path in service lp - using /tmp No path in service lp2
2005 Apr 28
1
Openssh Solaris problem writing /var/adm/wtmp
Hi :-) i have rollout a new ssh pakage in our environment. Apr 27 12:06:03 systemx sshd[869]: [ID 847 auth.info] wtmp_write: problem writing /var/adm/wtmp: No such file or directory Solaris 8 has no /var/adm/wtmp, it use /var/adm/wtmpx In the old package there was many of this messages I compiled the new package with --disable-wtmp \ --enable-wtmpx \ but sometimes one of this message are in
2011 Oct 21
0
[Bug 1946] New: AIX and /var/adm/wtmp
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1946 Bug #: 1946 Summary: AIX and /var/adm/wtmp Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at
2005 Feb 10
0
ADM 0.7 Released
All, Just to let you know i've released an updated version of ADM Key features: * Automatic on-call volume reduction * One click dial from clipboard * Automatic on-call messenger away * Automatic/manual DND phone setting (Cisco 79xx only) * One click call forward setup (Cisco 79xx only) * GUI manager console interface http://adm.hamnett.org Enjoy :)
2009 Apr 25
0
Information required about ADM
Hello All, I'm a newbie and just started working on asterisk.I have recently installed ADM and I want to know about ADM (Asterisk Desktop Manager) like its benchmarks ,issues or bugs, compatibility with which asterisk version e.t.c. and then any Good web-based CRM recommendations. thanx in anticipation. Regards Gohar _________________________________________________________________ More
2009 Jun 23
1
ADM v. homemade code
Hi, I am attempting to implement Answering Machine Detect and have also played with using BackgroundDetect instead. Does anyone recommend one over the other? Here is the code I am using for the BackgroundDetect method (from voip-info.org). Thanks. [detect] exten => s,1,Set(MACHINE=0) exten => s,2,Answer exten => s,3,BackgroundDetect(silence/5, 1000, 50) exten =>
2009 Mar 20
1
Samba support for ADM files
Hi What I would like to do is have my custom adm files in a shared folder on my samba server so that if I make a change, it updates the windows XP clients on my network in a similar fashion to active directory on a windows server. However, I cannot seem to find any support for this in samba in the documentation I have read. Do I have to go to each machine and use group policy editor to load
2012 Aug 12
1
tuned-adm fixed Windows VM disk write performance on CentOS 6
On a 32bit Windows 2008 Server guest VM on a CentOS 5 host, iometer reported a disk write speed of 37MB/s The same VM on a CentOS 6 host reported 0.3MB/s. i.e. The VM was unusable. Write performance in a CentOS 6 VM was also much worse, but it was usable. (See http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2012-August/002961.html) With iometer still running in the guest, I installed tuned on
2019 Jul 05
3
Have you run "tuned-adm profile throughput-performance" ?
On 7/4/19 10:18 PM, Steven Tardy wrote: > I would also look at power settings in the BIOS and c-state settings in the > BIOS and OS as disabling c-states (often enabled by default to meet > green/energy star compliance) can make a noticeable performance difference. I'd be surprised if it did, but now that you mention it, I think that we should probably mention more often that
2005 Feb 05
0
AVVISO DI VIRUS / VIRUS WARNING : Worm.SomeFool.P
Il messaggio sotto riportato, spedito dal vostro indirizzo di posta, contiene un VIRUS e pertanto non ? stato consegnato. Probabilmente il computer dal quale ? stato spedito ? infetto. CONTROLLATELO QUANTO PRIMA CON UN PROGRAMMA ANTIVIRUS! A message containing a virus was sent from your e-mail address. It is very likely this machine (or any other you use for e-mail) is infected! CHECK IT AS SOON