similar to: Custom package provider -- not stored locally?

possibly related to (or the same as) issues 4830 and 2244, i''m getting errors when adding a custom fact and provider to a module to propagate to clients. am i missing something here? i tried the workaround of adding a fileserver.conf to the master (referenced below and in the tickets) with no change. thanks for any help. here''s a pile of details: puppetmaster 2.6.9 is running

Hi, I''m following http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PluginsInModules in order to use a custom fact. My modules looks like: # ls manifests/modules/network/ manifests plugins # ls manifests/modules/network/plugins/facter/primaryint.rb manifests/modules/network/plugins/facter/primaryint.rb as is said in doc. Then: Turn on pluginsync and specify factpath, so that the facts

I''m running into a weird issue with a custom package provider for PEAR. I''m using the provider I found here<https://raw.github.com/gist/305778/13f46dea6eba07e38778d7159644b4210ebe7bbe/pear.rb>and the provider itself works fine. I''ve got it stored on the Puppet master under /etc/puppet/modules/common/lib/provider/package/pear.rb and the puppet.conf has pluginsync

Dear porters and port users, I've added a new port security/portaudit-db that complements security/portaudit for users that have a current ports tree and want to generate the portaudit database themselves, possibly distributing it over their local network. This will save you the traffic downloading information that is already on your local machine and avoid the lag that is currently

December 18, 2007 Dear Madam, dear Sir, the portaudit database is very small: >portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 5688 B 9737 Bps New database installed. > In addition, portaudit does not complain about what it did complain a few days ago. It seems to me that the database is truncated. By the way: How do I post to a mailing list without being later spammed by the

As some before me on the group, I have a problem getting the Chocolatey provider to work on Windows. I downloaded it from Github and placed it in /etc/puppetlabs/puppet/modules/chocolatey. (I am running Puppet Enterprise 2.7.19). On a Windows 8 client, I have a very simple manifest: class install_notepadplusplus { if $::osfamily == ''windows { $pkg =

Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced SNs entirely,

May I please ask again for some assistance with the question below? I hope somebody can help me. Thanks, Ed Greenberg -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Using custom facts in Puppet Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:14:06 -0600 From: Ed Greenberg <edg@greenberg.org> Reply-To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com On 11/16/2010 09:33

Hello! Port security/portaudit reports the following problem: Affected package: FreeBSD-491000 Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code. Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-81b0-000347a4fa7d.htm l> Note: To disable this check add the uuid to `portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf I have 2 related questions: 1)

Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to

Seeing an error that I didn''t get in .24 since my recent upgrade today. I have pluginsync set to true, my fileserver conf is pointing to /etc/puppet/plugins and my config file is using the default pluginsource of puppet://puppet/plugins yet the client fails saying it can''t find it. Did the behaviour change in .25 from .24? [puppetd] pluginsync = true pluginsource =

Old Synopsis: portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs New Synopsis: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-security Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 21:37:38 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84312

Hello, The mysql40-client port currently reports a security problem when I try to install it: neely:/usr/ports/databases/mysql40-client$ make ===> mysql-client-4.0.18_1 has known vulnerabilities: >> MySQL insecure temporary file creation (mysqlbug). Reference: <http://people.freebsd.org/~eik/portaudit/2e129846-8fbb-11d8-8b29-0020ed76ef5a.html> >> Please update your ports

I just drudged through a bit of the archives and see a FreeBSD bits floating in there that are of some value, but aren''t on the wiki. I posted a few bits on the wiki regarding some FreeBSD cobbling that I''ve done recently and hope that folk find it of use (and start posting their useful bits there as well). http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetFreeBSD The

With custom type ''vcsrepo'', I''ve been getting this error ever since I restarted my master box: Error: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Invalid parameter provider at /etc/puppet/environments/local/modules/user_mpeebles/manifests/init.pp:56 on node 1001.milespeebles.org Warning: Not using cache on failed catalog Error: Could not

I am trying out having multiple environments so that I can push a test config to a single server in production. The idea being that I could push out a config change to one server and see if the change works in production. If it does then I can merge the change into the production environment and push the change out to all the clients. So to test this I made a change to a config file in testing

Hi all, I have installed and configure puppet client in new virtual machine, but I have this error when running *puppetd --test (even if I run /etc/init.d/puppet restart) /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/defaults.rb:136:in `handle'': Invalid environment test (ArgumentError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/util/settings.rb:299:in `parse'' from

still pretty new to Ruby, please bare with me :) Say I have a module with a custom type, structured like so: [modules]/mymodule/manifests/init.pp [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/provider/mytype/foo.rb [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/type/mytype.rb In foo.rb, I''d like to call some custom ruby functions in a module and/ or class. These are generic functions that may be used in other modules,

I am trying to get a custom fact to sync. The fact is in a module. It will sync if I run puppet with "--pluginsync" but not otherwise. I have "pluginsync=true" in my puppet.conf. Shouldn''t the command line option and puppet.conf option have the same results? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.

Hello all, I''m running puppet for the first ime. I''ve finished the install but I''m stuck at the certificate part. The puppet master (0.24.4-3) is running on Ubuntu Lenny and the puppet client (0.24.8-4.el5) is running on CentOS 5.3. After the install, from the client side, I''ve run: puppetd --server puppetmaster.domain.com --waitforcert 60 --test On the