similar to: SuSE Security Announcement - new security tools

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: proftpd-1.2.0pre6 and earlier Date: Thu Sep 16 20:59:18 CEST 1999 Affected: all UNIX platforms using proftpd ______________________________________________________________________________ A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: lynx-2.8.2 and older Date: Thu Sep 16 21:29:15 CEST 1999 Affected: all Linux distributions using lynx-2.8.2 and older

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: ypserv prior 1.3.9 Date: Tue Sep 28 08:38:50 CEST 1999 Affected: all linux distributions using the ypserv package ______________________________________________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: xf86-3.3.3-5 Date: Sun Mar 28 12:26:39 CEST 1999 Affected: unix operating systems using xfree86 ______________________________________________________________________________ A security hole

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: mirror-2.8.f4 Date: Fri Oct 01 22:21:15 MEST 1999 Affected: all Linux distributions using mirror <= 2.8.f4 _____________________________________________________________________________ A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello! Probably a stupid question, but... Is it possible to run Samba (2.0.0beta5 or any other version) in 2 completely independent identities on a single machine with 2 virtual ip interfaces? As I understand it you can not run 2 nmbd's, because broadcast packets are only delivered to one of the 2 udp sockets bound to 0.0.0.0:137. If I use the 'netbios

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello! I've put some source and binary rpms for SuSE Linux 5.3 and 6.0 on samba.org. They should show up in the Binary_Packages/SuSE directories on your favourite samba.org mirror soon. Regards, Volker Lendecke -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNp8ylj/9BWnmOc5FAQGPfQP8DqGk/eeNplGY4muRRDIvcnjEEFe5Cz4G

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --1918950298-1868141776-898362261=:6767 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Something to think about for CRAN's future. best, -tony --1918950298-1868141776-898362261=:6767

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 12:33:00 -0500 > From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@ENTERACT.COM> > On almost all Unix operating systems, having superuser access in a > chroot() jail is still dangerous. In some recent revisions of 4.4BSD > operating systems, root can trivially escape chroot(), as well. I was thinking about possible attacks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The autodetection routines for some linux modules can tie up the machine for several seconds at a time. By trying to open devices not present on the machine, a local user can disrupt service considerably. A very simple exploit is victim$ ls /dev/*/* repeatedly. A suggested fix is to remove or chmod 0 device nodes for hardware not installed on the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi everyone - Someone I''m working with has a requirement to map ethernet card addresses to unique IP addresses, and then have a Linux IP masquerade server know of this mapping list and not allow any data to pass from any ethernet card that a) it doesn''t know about, or b) isn''t assigned the right IP. Ideally it would also log this

Hi, I'm running 2.04b on two RH 5.2 boxes (A + B). The boxes are control separate domains and have a router in between them. I would like for the domain controlled by A to show up in browse list on B. I've tried using remote announce on A to broadcast on the other side of the router, but domain A does not show up.... It seems to me that WINS (nmbd) should be able to hold

*** CALL FOR BETA TESTERS *** MimeStar, Inc. is preparing the final release of SecureNet PRO v2.0, a complete network security system. SecureNet PRO combines several key technologies including session monitoring, session hijacking, connection firewalling, and keyword-based intrusion detection. Version 2.0 of this product also includes a new graphical users interface and client-server

Hi, I recently tried to connect to a samba share as my user name, and then disconnected the share to try and reconnect as root. I got the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials". Someone recently mentionned that this was a security feature on the NT side. Well, seems Microsoft is claiming this is actually a bug. Found the following article in

Hi Folks, I've been trying to find a solution for this, but can't seem to find it in the doumentation, nor in the lists. We're running Samba-2.0.4b on Solaris 2.6. My smb.conf is included here: [global] server string = Test Server, Samba %v workgroup = <Workgroup Name> printing = sysv browseable = yes debuglevel = 2 netbios name

Hi all! Here is my problem: I have installed RedHat Linux version 6.0 on a computer and I want to share its resources via samba. Unfortunately, my computer - which is running WfWg 3.11 for Eastern Europe and the trumpet winsock TCP/IP stack is not able to see the samba server. Other computers, running Win95, Linux and WfWg with M$ TCP/IP stack perform OK. I have tried the following combinations:

On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~green/openssh.SHA-1.patch > MD5 (public_html/openssh.SHA-1.patch) = e21a896f59474a31ab3b9103acf44c35 > > P.S.: I realize other people may have proposed something very similar. > Indeed, markus's proposal may be something like this. However, > since it's impossible to work with anyone who

I am configuring Linux (2.0.33) as a local router. I am wanting to use Samba (1.9.18p3) to "manage" the browse lists on my network so that computers on each subnet can browse resources on the other subnets. My local network consists of Win95 and NT40 workstations with NT40 servers. My test configuration consists one token ring segment on one side of the Samba box (network .192) and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= CERT(sm) Advisory CA-96.20 Original issue date: September 18, 1996 Last revised: -- Topic: Sendmail Vulnerabilities - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** This advisory supersedes CA-95:05 *** The CERT Coordination Center